This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Using SSA

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: Alexander Lamaison <awl03 at doc dot ic dot ac dot uk>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:33:17 +0100
Subject: Re: Using SSA
References: <00c201c76c1d$b4bc5000$1e34f000$@ic.ac.uk> <46023E2D.7030005@lu.unisi.ch> <00c801c76c75$5b48f570$11dae050$@ic.ac.uk>
Reply-to: bonzini at gnu dot org

> I think (if I'm correctly interpreting the list in passes.c) it is.  It's
> right after pass_warn_function_noreturn, just before pass_mudflap_2.  Is
> this right?  I don't get any assertion about SSA not being available.

In this case, it is also after pass_del_ssa, which means SSA has already
been destroyed.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Using SSA
  - From: Alexander Lamaison

References:
- Using SSA
  - From: Alexander Lamaison
- Re: Using SSA
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- RE: Using SSA
  - From: Alexander Lamaison

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]