This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Doug Gregor <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:42:02 +0100
Subject: Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?
References: <24b520d20703121113y61cd3911odd9c385ff775dfb9@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

just wanted to say explicitely that I'm supporting completely Doug' efforts at fixing this issue. Well, I'm a little biased, because I'm working on C++/26099 and I will need at least one new tree code, but that's not the point, the point is that where we are implementing C++0x features and improving the C++ front-end generally, we are unavoidably adding tree codes and we must solve the issue, one way or another. We should help Doug in any possible way in this task, not ask for reversions.

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?
  - From: Steven Bosscher

References:
- We're out of tree codes; now what?
  - From: Doug Gregor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]