This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What does coding-style tells about integer types for pointers ?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Kai Tietz <Kai dot Tietz at onevision dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:07:19 -0800
Subject: Re: What does coding-style tells about integer types for pointers ?
References: <m31wjzekmp.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <OFA4934C92.8863E0D4-ONC1257298.005DD92A-C1257298.005E0595@onevision.de>

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 06:06:57PM +0100, Kai Tietz wrote:
> In gcc the file emutls.c assumes that a long has sizeof void * in function 
> emutls_destroy.

Not really.  It assumes you can store the size of the array
in min(sizeof(long), sizeof(void*)) bytes.



r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What does coding-style tells about integer types for pointers ?
  - From: Kai Tietz

References:
- Re: What does coding-style tells about integer types for pointers ?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: What does coding-style tells about integer types for pointers ?
  - From: Kai Tietz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]