This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Failed

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: Michel Pellegrin <copernicus_13 at hotmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 22:48:06 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Failed
References: <BAY103-F21A423A6893A1795B0F9D49B860@phx.gbl> <de8d50360703021803q6781dc02xb38157b975e837c0@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> -> http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc.html
>>
>> Failed Validation of W3C  !
>>
>> This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional !
>>
>>
>> W3C rules specify that XHTML tags have to be written in lowercase.
>> You have just to replace every "DIV" by "div" and validation will succeed.

Thanks for the report, Michel!

> Plus http://gcc.gnu.org/ valids as valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional.  So
> something in the conversion method that www.gnu.org does to the web
> pages break the validation.

I investigated a bit, and it seems that unlike gcc.gnu.org, www.gnu.org 
lacks the latest revision (at least) of the bin/preprocess script in our 
wwwdocs module:

  revision 1.43
  date: 2006/06/10 21:52:24;  author: gerald;  state: Exp;  lines: +2 -0
  Use sed to work around MetaHTML brokenness wrt. <DIV>.

I have contacted the GNU sysadmins and asked them to update to the latest
version of the script.

Gerald

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Failed
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

References:
- Failed
  - From: Michel Pellegrin
- Re: Failed
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]