Re: Re; Maintaining, was: Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size

["Manuel López-Ibáñez" <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>]

On 02/03/07, Brooks Moses <brooks.moses@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> > On 02/03/07, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> A week is too short of time to ping a patch.
> >
> > Ups! I actually believed that a week was the recommended time to ping
> > a patch. What is it then?
>
> I remembered a week as well, but http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html says
> two weeks.
>
> I agree with Joe that you can't always expect an answer within a week,
> but I don't think that necessarily means that pinging after a week or so
> is a bad thing; it just means that patches are likely to get pinged
> sometimes.  It seems to me that pings work reasonably well in practice
> to deal with the "someone else should review this" problem.

That is what I think. Although I am going to change my frequency to
two weeks from now on to comply with contribute.html
Thanks for the info.

Manuel.