This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults?

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: mrs at apple dot com
Cc: iant at google dot com, hubicka at ucw dot cz, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:37:28 -0500
Subject: Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults?
References: <200702222340.l1MNeNbC018989@greed.delorie.com> <20070222234930.GE14919@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200702230033.l1N0XxP2028591@greed.delorie.com> <m31wkhr8h2.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <200702230114.l1N1EXHx029438@greed.delorie.com> <m3slcxpt4e.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <1A75E3F3-36F4-4CF5-B496-1D64AE10D116@apple.com>

> For ELF, this would be 256, good.  For pecoff, that would be smaller.

Actually, I think pecoff supports larger alignments.  DJGPP is plain
COFF (similar to i386-coff).

References:
- ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults?
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults?
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]