This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch


Mark Mitchell wrote:

Vladimir Makarov wrote:



I remember nocona tunning gave 30% improvement SPECFp2000 for Intel
nocona in 64 bit mode in comparison with the default x86_64 gcc tuning
(for k8). So such big improvement is definetly mostly from new
-mtune=generic.



Well, then, lets get numbers for other targets! I'd love to see the same data for PowerPC, MIPS, etc. This discussion will be much more productive in the presence of data. There are no absolutes: it's not "we can't ship with bugs", "we can't ship with performance regressions", etc. We've got to balance quality on various axes, and to do that we need to know the numbers.



I'd put Amd x86_64 first beacuse x86_64 gcc4.1 was tuned for this processor. Unfortunately, I have no available Amd machine for SPEC and can not help. Sorry.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]