This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch


Grigory Zagorodnev wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> Excellent question; I should have asked for that as well.  If 4.2 has
>> gained on 4.1 in other respects, the 4.7% drop might represent a smaller
>> regression relative to 4.1.
>>
> There is the 4.2 (r120817) vs. 4.1.2 release FP performance comparison
> numbers. SPECfp_base2006 of gcc 4.2 has 19% performance gain over 4.1.2.

Thank you for the measurements.

In that case, I think we have absolutely nothing to worry about for
4.2.0.  Whether we deliver 19% SPECfp, 23% SPECfp, or 15% SPECfp
improvements isn't so important; all of those numbers are a vast
improvement over 4.1.x.  Given that, I think we should just leave
Danny's conservative changes in, and not worry.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]