gcc archive
date index for February, 2007

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

February 28, 2007
22:44 gcc-4.2-20070228 is now available gccadmin
16:14 Re: Finalizer after pass? Diego Novillo
16:08 Finalizer after pass? Paulo J. Matos
15:52 Re: Why does linker fail to resolve dependencies within the same .a file? Christian Convey
15:32 Re: Why does linker fail to resolve dependencies within the same .a file? Nick Clifton
15:24 Re: Why does linker fail to resolve dependencies within the same .a file? Ian Lance Taylor
15:17 Re: Linker problems: dependencies with .a file not resolved? Jonathan Adamczewski
15:16 Re: Linker problems: dependencies with .a file not resolved? Ian Lance Taylor
15:14 Why does linker fail to resolve dependencies within the same .a file? Christian Convey
15:04 Re: Linker problems: dependencies with .a file not resolved? Christian Convey
09:57 Re: Why does linker fail to resolve dependencies within the same .a file? Nick Clifton
09:42 Is "FTZ/DAZ for SSE via fast math" available for x86 arch other than Linux? Zuxy Meng
05:24 Re: Why does linker fail to resolve dependencies within the same .a file? Jonathan Adamczewski
05:05 Why does linker fail to resolve dependencies within the same .a file? Christian Convey

February 27, 2007
23:17 RE: spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 Menezes, Evandro
22:54 Re: spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 Richard Guenther
22:29 RE: spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 Menezes, Evandro
22:17 Re: spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 nick
20:16 Re: vsftpd 2.0.5 vs. gcc 4.1.2 Florian Weimer
20:09 Re: vsftpd 2.0.5 vs. gcc 4.1.2 Andrew Pinski
17:06 RE: spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 Menezes, Evandro
16:49 Re: vcond implementation in altivec Devang Patel
11:51 Re: vsftpd 2.0.5 vs. gcc 4.1.2 Florian Weimer
11:35 vsftpd 2.0.5 vs. gcc 4.1.2 BuraphaLinux Server
09:19 Re: I need some advice for x86_64-pc-mingw32 va_list calling convention (in i386.c) Andrew Pinski
08:52 Re: I need some advice for x86_64-pc-mingw32 va_list calling convention (in i386.c) Kai Tietz
08:03 vcond implementation in altivec Ira Rosen
07:52 Re: Why use pentium4 for Pentium M? H. J. Lu
07:14 Re: Why use pentium4 for Pentium M? Paolo Bonzini
05:47 Re: Generate -zero RTX expression Ian Lance Taylor
05:35 Re: Strange behavior for scan-tree-dump testing Ian Lance Taylor
05:32 Re: Porting GCC to new architecture Ian Lance Taylor
04:30 Why use pentium4 for Pentium M? Zuxy Meng
02:03 Re: RS6000 call pattern clobbers Richard Kenner
01:05 Re: store_expr, expr_size, and C++ Richard Henderson

February 26, 2007
23:36 Re: I need some advice for x86_64-pc-mingw32 va_list calling convention (in i386.c) Ross Ridge
22:43 gcc-4.1-20070226 is now available gccadmin
22:04 store_expr, expr_size, and C++ Steve Ellcey
20:41 Re: Running GCC tests on installed compiler Gerald Pfeifer
18:42 Re: RS6000 call pattern clobbers Joern Rennecke
18:10 Re: I need some advice for x86_64-pc-mingw32 va_list calling convention (in i386.c) Richard Henderson
15:48 Re: getting spam David Daney
14:55 Generate -zero RTX expression Revital1 Eres
13:35 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Denis Nagorny
12:38 Re: GCC 4.3 Stage 1 project survey Zdenek Dvorak
12:31 Re: RS6000 call pattern clobbers Richard Kenner
10:58 getting spam Alexander
10:20 Re: warning: source missing a mode? Markus Franke
10:17 RE: Auto Vectorizing help needed Tehila Meyzels
08:41 RE: I need some advice for x86_64-pc-mingw32 va_list calling convention (in i386.c) Kai Tietz
04:17 Strange behavior for scan-tree-dump testing Mohamed Shafi
03:19 RS6000 call pattern clobbers David Edelsohn
00:13 Re: spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 Jan Hubicka
00:01 Porting GCC to new architecture Alexandre Tzannes

February 25, 2007
23:56 Re: spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 Vladimir N. Makarov
23:56 Re: spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 Vladimir N. Makarov
22:27 Re: spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 Jan Hubicka
22:24 Re: GCC 4.3 Stage 1 project survey Dorit Nuzman
22:01 Re: spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 Serge Belyshev
21:21 Re: spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 Vladimir N. Makarov
19:40 Successful GCC 4.1.2 i686-pc-mingw32 build+install JohnE / TDM
18:13 Re: spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 Daniel Berlin
18:12 Re: spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 Daniel Berlin
12:28 Re: Fold and integer types with sub-ranges Richard Kenner
11:36 Re: Fold and integer types with sub-ranges Duncan Sands

February 24, 2007
17:17 spec2k comparison of gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on AMD K8 Serge Belyshev
17:16 ICE While Building 4.2 Branch tbrowder
15:10 gcc 4.1 and 4.2 comparison on SPEC2000 on PPC64 Vladimir N. Makarov
13:27 Re: Fold and integer types with sub-ranges Richard Kenner
12:35 Re: Fold and integer types with sub-ranges Richard Guenther
09:36 Re: Auto Vectorizing help needed gcc-gpu at adrenalin-junkie do
01:36 Re: Comparison of Itanium gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on Spec2000 Ian Lance Taylor
01:36 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? Richard Kenner
01:28 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? DJ Delorie
01:28 Re: Comparison of Itanium gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on Spec2000 Robert Dewar
01:24 Re: Fold and integer types with sub-ranges Richard Kenner
01:12 Re: Comparison of Itanium gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on Spec2000 Joe Buck
00:33 Re: Auto Vectorizing help needed Richard Henderson
00:23 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? Richard Henderson
00:13 Auto Vectorizing help needed sdutta

February 23, 2007
23:19 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? DJ Delorie
23:15 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? DJ Delorie
22:44 gcc-4.3-20070223 is now available gccadmin
22:17 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? Mike Stump
21:47 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? Jan Hubicka
21:42 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? Jan Hubicka
21:32 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? DJ Delorie
21:15 [Compile Farm] 8 GCC releases with all languages available Laurent GUERBY
20:36 RE: I need some advice for x86_64-pc-mingw32 va_list calling convention (in i386.c) Menezes, Evandro
19:58 Re: GCC 4.3 Stage 1 project survey Joseph S. Myers
19:02 GCC 4.3 Stage 1 project survey Matthew Wilcox
18:47 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? Richard Henderson
18:42 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? DJ Delorie
18:08 Re: Floating point insn dependency - GCC 4.1.1 Richard Henderson
18:06 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? Richard Henderson
17:59 Re: warning: source missing a mode? Richard Henderson
17:24 Re: I need some advice for x86_64-pc-mingw32 va_list calling convention (in i386.c) Ross Ridge
16:10 Re: Comparison of Itanium gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on Spec2000 Vladimir N. Makarov
16:01 Re: Fold and integer types with sub-ranges Richard Guenther
16:00 Re: Comparison of Itanium gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on Spec2000 Mark Mitchell
15:58 Re: Floating point insn dependency - GCC 4.1.1 Ian Lance Taylor
15:52 Re: Floating point insn dependency - GCC 4.1.1 Paul Brook
15:48 Re: Fold and integer types with sub-ranges Duncan Sands
15:02 Fold and integer types with sub-ranges Richard Guenther
15:00 Re: Floating point insn dependency - GCC 4.1.1 Ian Lance Taylor
14:24 Comparison of Itanium gcc 4.1 and 4.2 on Spec2000 Vladimir N. Makarov
14:09 build Error sameer sinha
10:33 I need some advice for x86_64-pc-mingw32 va_list calling convention (in i386.c) Kai Tietz
08:21 Re: warning: source missing a mode? Florian Stock
08:21 Re: Cannot build gcc-4.1.2 on cygwin: /bin/sh: kinds.h: No such file or directory Christian Joensson
07:03 Floating point insn dependency - GCC 4.1.1 Rohit Arul Raj
01:37 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? DJ Delorie
01:30 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? Mike Stump
01:21 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? Ian Lance Taylor
01:14 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? DJ Delorie
01:03 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? Ian Lance Taylor
00:34 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? DJ Delorie

February 22, 2007
23:49 Re: ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? Jan Hubicka
23:40 ix86_data_alignment: bad defaults? DJ Delorie
23:06 Re: RFC: Constructor and destructor priority attributes Andrew Pinski
22:52 RFC: Constructor and destructor priority attributes Mark Mitchell
19:01 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Vladimir Makarov
18:41 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Mark Mitchell
18:26 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Vladimir Makarov
17:57 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Jan Hubicka
17:15 Re: warning: source missing a mode? Markus Franke
17:02 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Mark Mitchell
16:33 Re: warning: source missing a mode? Ian Lance Taylor
16:27 Re: warning: source missing a mode? Markus Franke
16:18 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Vladimir Makarov
16:16 Re: warning: source missing a mode? Markus Franke
16:15 Re: warning: source missing a mode? Ian Lance Taylor
16:13 Re: warning: source missing a mode? Ian Lance Taylor
15:44 Re: Porting GCC/ GDB help ::Porting the configuration scripts Ian Lance Taylor
15:41 Re: warning: source missing a mode? Ian Lance Taylor
15:11 Re: reassociation pass and built-in functions Daniel Berlin
14:38 Re: A combiner type optimization is causing a failure Pranav Bhandarkar
14:34 Re: A combiner type optimization is causing a failure Paolo Bonzini
13:56 A combiner type optimization is causing a failure Pranav Bhandarkar
13:50 Porting GCC/ GDB help ::Porting the configuration scripts Mans
13:47 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Grigory Zagorodnev
12:23 Re: "Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'" on 64bit boxes Richard Guenther
11:50 "Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'" on 64bit boxes Alok kataria
11:37 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Jakub Jelinek
10:52 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch H. J. Lu
10:10 warning: source missing a mode? Markus Franke
07:45 Re: About implementing new intrinsic Revital1 Eres
07:19 Re: Cannot build gcc-4.1.2 on cygwin: /bin/sh: kinds.h: No such file or directory Christian Joensson

February 21, 2007
23:34 Re: "Installing GCC" documentation: Why a nonstandard title page? Gerald Pfeifer
22:42 gcc-4.2-20070221 is now available gccadmin
22:16 gcc 4.1.2 - successful build and install - i386-pc-mingw32 (msys running on a WinXP box) Marcelo Slomp
22:12 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Daniel Jacobowitz
22:00 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Richard Guenther
21:32 Re: "Installing GCC" documentation: Why a nonstandard title page? Mark Mitchell
20:02 Re: Incorrect code generation while passing address of char parameter Jim Wilson
19:58 Re: Question about source-to-source compilation Jim Wilson
19:50 Re: "Installing GCC" documentation: Why a nonstandard title page? Jim Wilson
18:46 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Gerald Pfeifer
16:49 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Mark Mitchell
16:48 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Daniel Jacobowitz
16:36 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:55 Re: Question about source-to-source compilation Steven Bosscher
15:47 Question about source-to-source compilation Thomas Bernard
11:21 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Robert Dewar
11:20 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Richard Guenther
10:30 Re: Cannot build gcc-4.1.2 on cygwin: /bin/sh: kinds.h: No such file or directory Brian Dessent
09:37 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Benjamin Kosnik
09:20 Re: Cannot build gcc-4.1.2 on cygwin: /bin/sh: kinds.h: No such file or directory Brooks Moses
09:03 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Andrew Pinski
09:02 Re: "Installing GCC" documentation: Why a nonstandard title page? Brooks Moses
09:00 Re: Cannot build gcc-4.1.2 on cygwin: /bin/sh: kinds.h: No such file or directory Brian Dessent
08:48 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Benjamin Kosnik
08:38 Re: Cannot build gcc-4.1.2 on cygwin: /bin/sh: kinds.h: No such file or directory Brooks Moses
08:23 Cannot build gcc-4.1.2 on cygwin: /bin/sh: kinds.h: No such file or directory Christian Joensson
06:35 "Installing GCC" documentation: Why a nonstandard title page? Brooks Moses
05:54 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Gabriel Dos Reis
03:51 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Daniel Berlin
01:56 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Daniel Jacobowitz

February 20, 2007
23:57 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Mark Mitchell
23:54 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Mark Mitchell
23:25 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Kaveh R. GHAZI
21:51 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Andi Kleen
20:22 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Richard Guenther
20:02 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Grigory Zagorodnev
19:42 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Vladimir Makarov
19:17 Re: RFC: vectorizer cost model Joern Rennecke
19:12 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Paolo Bonzini
18:16 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Devang Patel
18:11 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Eric Botcazou
18:10 RFC: vectorizer cost model Devang Patel
18:02 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Devang Patel
17:26 Re: reassociation pass and built-in functions Andrew Pinski
17:24 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Vladimir Makarov
17:16 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Paolo Bonzini
17:15 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Vladimir Makarov
16:58 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Steven Bosscher
16:56 Re: Call for help: when can compare_and_jump_seq produce sequences with control flow insns? Serge Belyshev
16:54 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Richard Guenther
16:50 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Vladimir Makarov
16:41 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Richard Guenther
16:36 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Vladimir Makarov
16:25 Re: Preserving alias analysis information Zdenek Dvorak
15:25 Re: it'urgent please help me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Robert Dewar
15:23 Re: it'urgent please help me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ian Lance Taylor
15:11 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Kaveh R. GHAZI
13:54 Re: Preserving alias analysis information Roberto COSTA
13:08 reassociation pass and built-in functions Revital1 Eres
12:54 Re: Preserving alias analysis information Zdenek Dvorak
12:40 Incorrect code generation while passing address of char parameter Shekhar Divekar
11:25 Re: Preserving alias analysis information Roberto COSTA
10:55 Re: Preserving alias analysis information Zdenek Dvorak
10:31 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) PaweÅ Sikora
10:18 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Richard Guenther
09:14 Re: Preserving alias analysis information Roberto COSTA
07:47 Re: Preserving alias analysis information Zdenek Dvorak
07:36 Re: Announcing Kaz as sh maintainer Alexandre Oliva
06:46 it'urgent please help me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sameer sinha
05:07 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Brooks Moses
03:27 builtin functions and how to handle them in the CFG Ben Elliston
02:26 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Marcin Dalecki
01:51 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Daniel Berlin
01:17 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Mark Mitchell
00:35 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Joe Buck
00:27 Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Joseph S. Myers
00:00 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Mark Mitchell

February 19, 2007
23:59 GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-02-19) Mark Mitchell
23:48 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch H. J. Lu
23:40 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Daniel Berlin
23:16 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Mark Mitchell
23:15 Re: Preserving alias analysis information Daniel Berlin
23:07 Re: Preserving alias analysis information Zdenek Dvorak
22:44 gcc-4.1-20070219 is now available gccadmin
22:11 Re: Call for help: when can compare_and_jump_seq produce sequences with control flow insns? Hans-Peter Nilsson
21:01 Re: Preserving alias analysis information Daniel Berlin
20:11 Preserving alias analysis information Roberto COSTA
19:42 Announcing Kaz as sh maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
18:49 Re: GCC mirror set up in Germany Gerald Pfeifer
12:13 Re: Fw: Strange paths for gcc for x86_64-pc-mingw32 Kai Tietz
12:06 Re: GCC 4.3 ia64 bootstrap failure Grigory Zagorodnev
12:03 Re: Fw: Strange paths for gcc for x86_64-pc-mingw32 Daniel Jacobowitz
11:45 Ping: How to get rid of attribute(mode(word))? Andreas Krebbel
10:03 Re: GCC 4.3 ia64 bootstrap failure Lee Millward
09:36 Re: Fw: Strange paths for gcc for x86_64-pc-mingw32 Kai Tietz
09:32 Re: Fw: Strange paths for gcc for x86_64-pc-mingw32 Paolo Bonzini
09:18 Re: GCC 4.3 ia64 bootstrap failure Lee Millward
09:10 Fw: Strange paths for gcc for x86_64-pc-mingw32 Tehila Meyzels
08:29 Strange pathes for gcc for x86_64-pc-mingw32 Kai Tietz
08:18 Re: GCC 4.3 ia64 bootstrap failure Grigory Zagorodnev
07:39 GCC 4.3 ia64 bootstrap failure Grigory Zagorodnev
00:08 Request: -mtune=athlon64v Erdem U. Altunyurt

February 18, 2007
23:16 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Daniel Berlin
22:38 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Richard Guenther
18:39 Re: About implementing new intrinsic Revital1 Eres
17:17 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Daniel Berlin
15:01 Re: About implementing new intrinsic Ferad Zyulkyarov
14:38 Re: About implementing new intrinsic Revital1 Eres
12:27 RE: install gcc Tehila Meyzels
12:16 install gcc m.gelil

February 17, 2007
22:58 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch H. J. Lu
21:50 Re: Makefile.def and fixincludes/Makefile.in inconsistency? Brooks Moses
16:24 messages in objective-C Come Lonfils
13:21 Re: 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch David Edelsohn
10:35 40% performance regression SPEC2006/leslie3d on gcc-4_2-branch Vladimir Sysoev
02:46 DWARF has new home Michael Eager

February 16, 2007
23:11 Re: sizeof struct { short x } on arm gcc-3.2.1 Mike Stump
23:04 Re: i386.md:3705: error: undefined machine-specific constraint at this point: "Y" Jan Hubicka
22:56 Re: Question about register allocation (GCC 4.1) Jim Wilson
22:45 gcc-4.3-20070216 is now available gccadmin
21:18 i386.md:3705: error: undefined machine-specific constraint at this point: "Y" Kaveh R. GHAZI
19:55 Bootstrap failure in tree-ssa-pre.o Art Haas
18:35 Re: RFC: vectorizer cost model Zdenek Dvorak
18:15 Re: RFC: vectorizer cost model Ian Lance Taylor
17:23 Re: Question about register allocation (GCC 4.1) Andrew Haley
17:22 Call for help: when can compare_and_jump_seq produce sequences with control flow insns? Steven Bosscher
17:20 Question about register allocation (GCC 4.1) Thomas Bernard
17:05 RFC: vectorizer cost model Linthicum, Tony
17:00 Re: sizeof struct { short x } on arm gcc-3.2.1 Rutger Hofman
16:46 Re: sizeof struct { short x } on arm gcc-3.2.1 Paul Brook
15:13 sizeof struct { short x } on arm gcc-3.2.1 Rutger Hofman
14:13 Re: what is difference between gcc-ada and GNAT???? Robert Dewar
14:08 Re: what is difference between gcc-ada and GNAT???? Duncan Sands
14:04 Re: what is difference between gcc-ada and GNAT???? Robert Dewar
13:57 Re: what is difference between gcc-ada and GNAT???? Eric Botcazou
13:54 Re: what is difference between gcc-ada and GNAT???? Robert Dewar
13:44 Re: what is difference between gcc-ada and GNAT???? Duncan Sands
13:23 Re: what is difference between gcc-ada and GNAT???? Robert Dewar
12:49 Re: what is difference between gcc-ada and GNAT???? Robert Dewar
10:01 Re: what is difference between gcc-ada and GNAT???? Duncan Sands
08:38 Re: Makefile.def and fixincludes/Makefile.in inconsistency? Paolo Bonzini
04:35 Makefile.def and fixincludes/Makefile.in inconsistency? Brooks Moses
03:54 what is difference between gcc-ada and GNAT???? sameer sinha
01:42 new port to older gcc: Toshiba Media Processor (MeP) DJ Delorie

February 15, 2007
22:28 Re: [Autovect]dependencies of virtual defs/uses Jiahua He
21:07 Re: [Autovect]dependencies of virtual defs/uses Dorit Nuzman
21:05 Re: Insn canonicalization not only with constant Sami Khawam
19:51 Re: Insn canonicalization not only with constant Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
18:38 Re: maybe vectorizer-bug regarding unhandled data-ref Daniel Berlin
18:32 Re: maybe vectorizer-bug regarding unhandled data-ref Dorit Nuzman
17:43 maybe vectorizer-bug regarding unhandled data-ref Thomas Veith
17:39 Re: Insn canonicalization not only with constant Sami Khawam
04:35 Re: minimal version of bison for Gcc? Ben Elliston
04:21 4.1 branch open Mark Mitchell
00:00 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC3 Cancelled Mark Mitchell

February 14, 2007
23:32 Re: SSSE3 -mssse3 or SSE3 -msse3? Andrew Pinski
23:27 Re: No notice before, GCC 4.1.2 is RELEASED! Joe Buck
23:25 Re: SSSE3 -mssse3 or SSE3 -msse3? Brooks Moses
23:22 Re: Performance regression on the 4.3 branch? FX Coudert
22:57 Re: SSSE3 -mssse3 or SSE3 -msse3? Andrew Pinski
22:51 SSSE3 -mssse3 or SSE3 -msse3? J.C.
22:45 gcc-4.2-20070214 is now available gccadmin
22:34 No notice before, GCC 4.1.2 is RELEASED! J.C.
21:31 Re: mudflap vs bounds-checking Frank Ch. Eigler
21:18 Re: Insn canonicalization not only with constant Andrew Pinski
20:31 Re: Insn canonicalization not only with constant Sami Khawam
18:09 Re: Insn canonicalization not only with constant Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
17:34 About implementing new intrinsic Ferad Zyulkyarov
17:31 Insn canonicalization not only with constant Sami Khawam
16:29 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Richard Kenner
15:55 Re: gcc (lack of) return type warnings Manuel López-Ibáñez
15:46 mudflap vs bounds-checking Christophe LYON
15:39 Re: Performance regression on the 4.3 branch? Diego Novillo
15:35 Re: gcc (lack of) return type warnings Andreas Schwab
15:28 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Paolo Bonzini
15:12 Re: gcc (lack of) return type warnings Tobias Pflug
15:11 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Richard Kenner
15:06 Re: gcc (lack of) return type warnings Andreas Schwab
15:00 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Paolo Bonzini
14:55 minimal version of bison for Gcc? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
14:30 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Richard Kenner
14:27 Re: How should __attribute__ ((gnu_inline)) behave? Jakub Jelinek
14:22 Re: Performance regression on the 4.3 branch? H. J. Lu
14:16 gcc (lack of) return type warnings Tobias Pflug
14:11 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC3 Cancelled Kaveh R. GHAZI
13:34 Re: Performance regression on the 4.3 branch? PaweÅ Sikora
12:54 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Paolo Bonzini
12:41 Performance regression on the 4.3 branch? François-Xavier Coudert
12:29 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Richard Kenner
08:54 A Survey on Defect Management Practices in Free/Open Source Software Anu Gupta DCSA
06:07 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Paolo Bonzini
05:26 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC3 Cancelled Mark Mitchell
02:22 How should __attribute__ ((gnu_inline)) behave? Ian Lance Taylor
02:15 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC3 Cancelled Kaveh R. GHAZI
01:51 Re: Pre Compiled Headers Mike Stump
00:54 Re: Pre Compiled Headers Brendon Costa
00:28 Re: Pre Compiled Headers Mike Stump

February 13, 2007
23:17 Re: Pre Compiled Headers Brendon Costa
22:50 Re: Pre Compiled Headers Mike Stump
21:35 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Steven Bosscher
21:34 Re: Pre Compiled Headers Brendon Costa
21:09 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Seongbae Park
21:07 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Vladimir Makarov
21:05 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Vladimir Makarov
20:55 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture David Edelsohn
20:47 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Vladimir Makarov
20:46 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Steven Bosscher
20:40 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Vladimir Makarov
20:05 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Steven Bosscher
20:02 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Paolo Bonzini
19:54 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture David Edelsohn
19:24 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Vladimir Makarov
19:17 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture David Edelsohn
19:04 Re: Pre Compiled Headers Devang Patel
17:33 Re: gcc port to StarCore Ian Lance Taylor
17:29 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Jeffrey Law
17:27 Re: gcc port to StarCore David Livshin
17:16 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Vladimir Makarov
17:11 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Steven Bosscher
16:41 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture David Edelsohn
16:35 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Richard Kenner
16:27 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Vladimir Makarov
15:53 Re: Disable auto-generation of strncpy on ppc? Etienne Lorrain
15:29 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastructure Kenneth Zadeck
15:16 Re: Disable auto-generation of strncpy on ppc? Ian Lance Taylor
15:14 Re: gcc port to StarCore Ian Lance Taylor
14:23 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastructure Richard Kenner
14:05 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastructure Kenneth Zadeck
13:11 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Richard Kenner
10:24 Re: Disable auto-generation of strncpy on ppc? Etienne Lorrain
10:18 Disable auto-generation of strncpy on ppc? Etienne Lorrain
08:58 gcc port to StarCore David Livshin
07:09 Re: Pre Compiled Headers Paolo Bonzini
06:42 Re: Pre Compiled Headers Basile STARYNKEVITCH
06:22 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Ian Lance Taylor
05:24 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastructure Steven Bosscher
04:56 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Daniel Berlin
04:45 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Mark Mitchell
04:26 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Vladimir N. Makarov
04:15 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Vladimir N. Makarov
03:54 Re: [Autovect]dependencies of virtual defs/uses Mike Stump
03:54 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Vladimir N. Makarov
03:46 Re: Pre Compiled Headers Mike Stump
02:39 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastructure Vladimir N. Makarov
00:06 re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastructure Kenneth Zadeck

February 12, 2007
23:39 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Richard Kenner
22:48 GCC 4.1.2 RC3 Cancelled Mark Mitchell
22:43 gcc-4.1-20070212 is now available gccadmin
22:28 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Joe Buck
21:53 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Mark Mitchell
21:42 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Mark Mitchell
21:42 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Joe Buck
21:40 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Vladimir Makarov
21:32 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Richard Henderson
21:26 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture David Edelsohn
21:19 Re: meaning of --enable-checking flags Larry Evans
21:17 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Ian Lance Taylor
21:11 Re: how to dump tree in pt.c:tsubst? Jim Wilson
21:03 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Mark Mitchell
20:57 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Mark Mitchell
20:54 Re: [Autovect]dependencies of virtual defs/uses Jiahua He
20:50 Re: Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Steven Bosscher
20:49 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Richard Henderson
20:33 Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture Vladimir Makarov
20:27 Re: [Autovect]dependencies of virtual defs/uses Dorit Nuzman
20:23 Re: [Autovect]dependencies of virtual defs/uses Dorit Nuzman
19:49 Re: [Autovect]dependencies of virtual defs/uses Jiahua He
19:39 Re: [Autovect]dependencies of virtual defs/uses Daniel Berlin
19:36 [Autovect]dependencies of virtual defs/uses Jiahua He
18:06 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Mark Mitchell
17:59 Re: Is compare no longer enabled by default? H. J. Lu
17:53 Re: Is compare no longer enabled by default? Joe Buck
17:15 Re: Build fail Ian Lance Taylor
16:59 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Andrew Haley
10:54 Re: gcc-4.3, glibc and AC_PROG_CC_STDC Jakub Jelinek
09:38 Re: Division by zero Bernd Jendrissek
08:57 Re: Build fail Kai Ruottu
05:51 Re: gcc-4.3, glibc and AC_PROG_CC_STDC Paul Eggert
05:24 Re: ICE in gcc/libgcc2.c:566 (gcc trunk) H. J. Lu

February 11, 2007
23:59 Re: meaning of --enable-checking flags Gerald Pfeifer
23:46 Re: meaning of --enable-checking flags Larry Evans
23:10 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Mark Mitchell
22:30 Re: meaning of --enable-checking flags Larry Evans
22:11 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Eric Botcazou
21:48 Re: Is compare no longer enabled by default? Andreas Schwab
21:17 Pre Compiled Headers Brendon Costa
21:09 Re: ICE in gcc/libgcc2.c:566 (gcc trunk) H. J. Lu
21:04 Re: Is compare no longer enabled by default? H. J. Lu
21:00 Is compare no longer enabled by default? H. J. Lu
20:59 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Mark Mitchell
20:17 Re: meaning of --enable-checking flags Kaveh R. GHAZI
20:06 Re: US Daylight Savings Time Changes Mark Mitchell
18:41 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Eric Botcazou
18:06 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Kaveh R. GHAZI
16:08 Re: ICE in gcc/libgcc2.c:566 (gcc trunk) Hanno Meyer-Thurow
15:21 how to dump tree in pt.c:tsubst? Larry Evans
05:21 Re: Division by zero Jie Zhang

February 10, 2007
23:34 Re: meaning of --enable-checking flags Larry Evans
22:17 Re: problem building gcc4-4.3.0-20070209 Dominique Dhumieres
20:37 Re: problem building gcc4-4.3.0-20070209 Daniel Jacobowitz
19:35 Re: Inserting profiling function calls Michael Gong
17:59 Re: problem building gcc4-4.3.0-20070209 Paolo Bonzini
17:54 Re: Seeking advice on front ends Rafael EspÃndola
17:19 Re: problem building gcc4-4.3.0-20070209 Daniel Jacobowitz
16:46 Re: Division by zero Paolo Bonzini
16:08 Re: problem building gcc4-4.3.0-20070209 Paolo Bonzini
15:21 Re: Inserting profiling function calls Frank Ch. Eigler
13:54 Re: Division by zero Jie Zhang
13:45 Re: Division by zero Jie Zhang
13:35 Re: Division by zero Robert Dewar
13:32 Re: Division by zero Steven Bosscher
13:30 Re: Division by zero Jie Zhang
13:09 Re: Division by zero Robert Dewar
11:46 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Laurent GUERBY
11:06 Re: US Daylight Savings Time Changes Andrew Haley
09:41 Re: which opt. flags go where? - references Ronny Peine
08:43 Re: problem building gcc4-4.3.0-20070209 Dominique Dhumieres
08:06 Re: problem building gcc4-4.3.0-20070209 Dominique Dhumieres
07:08 Re: US Daylight Savings Time Changes Joe Buck
06:57 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Joe Buck
05:57 Re: Division by zero Ian Lance Taylor
05:50 Re: US Daylight Savings Time Changes David Edelsohn
05:00 Division by zero Jie Zhang
02:24 Re: problem building gcc4-4.3.0-20070209 Daniel Jacobowitz
00:46 Re: Any hints on this problem? Thanks! Jim Wilson

February 09, 2007
23:56 problem building gcc4-4.3.0-20070209 Dominique Dhumieres
23:45 Re: Any hints on this problem? Thanks! 吴曦
23:08 Re: US Daylight Savings Time Changes Tom Tromey
23:01 GCC mirror set up in Germany Sascha Schwarz
22:47 gcc-4.3-20070209 is now available gccadmin
21:36 GCC 4.1.2 RC2 Mark Mitchell
21:30 Re: Any hints on this problem? Thanks! Jan Hubicka
21:16 Re: US Daylight Savings Time Changes David Daney
21:08 Re: US Daylight Savings Time Changes Joe Buck
20:53 US Daylight Savings Time Changes Karnowski, David
20:28 Re: Inserting profiling function calls Jan Hubicka
20:12 Re: Any hints on this problem? Thanks! Jim Wilson
20:05 Re: Inserting profiling function calls Michael Gong
19:02 Re: ICE in gcc/libgcc2.c:566 (gcc trunk) Hanno Meyer-Thurow
18:21 meaning of --enable-checking flags Larry Evans
18:11 Re: Fw: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Dorit Nuzman
16:14 Re: gcc 3.4.4 miscompiles eCos Guennadi Liakhovetski
15:40 Re: Build fail Ian Lance Taylor
13:59 Re: Any hints on this problem? Thanks! Paul Yuan
12:18 Re: Any hints on this problem? Thanks! Andrew Haley
12:10 gcc 3.4.4 miscompiles eCos Guennadi Liakhovetski
12:00 Re: Any hints on this problem? Thanks! 吴曦
11:49 Re: Any hints on this problem? Thanks! Andreas Schwab
11:38 Any hints on this problem? Thanks! 吴曦
10:32 Re: Build fail Ferad Zyulkyarov
10:07 Re: Build fail Kai Ruottu
09:38 Re: Build fail Ferad Zyulkyarov
07:13 Re: Creating a USB binary Data Monitor Randy Dunlap
06:34 Creating a USB binary Data Monitor wsdice707
00:43 successful bootstrap - 4.1.2 prerelease on mingw32 Christian Schüler

February 08, 2007
22:56 Re: Inserting profiling function calls GERIN Patrice
22:12 Re: Inserting profiling function calls Jan Hubicka
21:40 Inserting profiling function calls GERIN Patrice
17:23 Re: "error: unable to generate reloads for...", any hints? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
17:11 Re: 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix H. J. Lu
12:19 Re: which opt. flags go where? - references Kenneth Hoste
09:48 Re: which opt. flags go where? - references Ronny Peine
08:31 Re: "error: unable to generate reloads for...", any hints? Ian Lance Taylor
08:26 Re: "error: unable to generate reloads for...", any hints? Steven Bosscher
08:22 Re: "error: unable to generate reloads for...", any hints? 吴曦
08:09 Re: "error: unable to generate reloads for...", any hints? Ian Lance Taylor
06:21 "error: unable to generate reloads for...", any hints? 吴曦

February 07, 2007
23:36 Re: ICE in gcc/libgcc2.c:566 (gcc trunk) Ian Lance Taylor
23:14 Re: Regarding tree traversal Prabhanjan Kambadur
23:01 Re: Regarding tree traversal Mike Stump
22:54 Re: Regarding tree traversal Mike Stump
22:43 gcc-4.2-20070207 is now available gccadmin
22:03 Re: ICE in gcc/libgcc2.c:566 (gcc trunk) Hanno Meyer-Thurow
21:47 Re: ICE in gcc/libgcc2.c:566 (gcc trunk) Ian Lance Taylor
21:21 Fw: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Ayal Zaks
21:15 Re: ICE in gcc/libgcc2.c:566 (gcc trunk) Hanno Meyer-Thurow
21:05 Regarding tree traversal Prabhanjan Kambadur
19:47 Re: Bug in value-prof.c:visit_hist Eric Botcazou
19:38 Bug in value-prof.c:visit_hist Robert Kidd
14:35 Re: which opt. flags go where? - references Kenneth Hoste
14:32 Re: 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix Vladimir Sysoev
14:23 Re: which opt. flags go where? - references Diego Novillo
13:56 which opt. flags go where? - references Kenneth Hoste
11:42 Re: False ???noreturn??? function does return warnings Sergei Organov
10:14 Re: A question about macro replacement Brooks Moses
09:37 Re: After GIMPLE... Paulo J. Matos
09:31 A question about macro replacement zhao_bingfeng
01:10 Re: false 'noreturn' function does return warnings Chris Lattner
01:09 Re: false 'noreturn' function does return warnings Ian Lance Taylor
01:06 Re: false 'noreturn' function does return warnings Joe Buck
00:15 Re: false 'noreturn' function does return warnings Ian Lance Taylor
00:06 Re: false 'noreturn' function does return warnings Mark Mitchell

February 06, 2007
23:32 Re: false 'noreturn' function does return warnings Zack Weinberg
23:14 Re: how to avoid duplicate warnings Ian Lance Taylor
22:10 Re: how to avoid duplicate warnings Joe Buck
21:54 how to avoid duplicate warnings Silvius Rus
21:05 Re: After GIMPLE... Diego Novillo
20:33 Re: False ???noreturn??? function does return warnings Jan Hubicka
20:06 Re: [c++] switch ( enum ) vs. default statment. Joe Buck
20:04 Re: [c++] switch ( enum ) vs. default statment. Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:00 Re: [c++] switch ( enum ) vs. default statment. Ralf Baechle
19:35 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Zdenek Dvorak
19:20 Re: After GIMPLE... Paulo J. Matos
18:48 Re: [c++] switch ( enum ) vs. default statment. Alexandre Oliva
18:44 Re: gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem Ralf Wildenhues
16:11 Possible regression with gcc 4.1.2 RC groeck
15:13 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Jan Hubicka
14:42 False ânoreturn â function does return warnings Ralf Baechle
13:09 Re: Add texi2pod.pl support for @multitable (was Re: Coldfire doc glitch) Joseph S. Myers
11:49 ICE in gcc/libgcc2.c:566 Hanno Meyer-Thurow
10:05 Add texi2pod.pl support for @multitable (was Re: Coldfire doc glitch) Richard Sandiford
10:04 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Richard Guenther
09:54 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Dorit Nuzman
09:49 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Ira Rosen
09:47 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Victor Kaplansky
09:17 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Richard Guenther
08:06 Coldfire doc glitch François-Xavier Coudert
07:58 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Dorit Nuzman

February 05, 2007
22:47 gcc-4.1-20070205 is now available gccadmin
21:54 RE: testing GCC 4.2 on IA64 using Debian as a test suite <--- correction Mark K. Smith
21:51 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Zdenek Dvorak
21:51 testing GCC 4.2 on IA64 using Debian as a test suite Mark K. Smith
19:43 ANNOUNCE: Gelato ICE GCC track, San Jose, CA, April 16-18, 2007 Mark K. Smith
19:38 Re: GCC 4.1.2 Status Report Mark Mitchell
19:22 Re: GCC 4.1.2 Status Report Richard Guenther
19:13 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Dorit Nuzman
19:12 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Dorit Nuzman
19:12 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Dorit Nuzman
19:01 Re: GCC 4.1.2 Status Report Mark Mitchell
18:14 Re: GCC 4.1.2 Status Report Daniel Berlin
16:14 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Richard Guenther
16:05 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Jan Hubicka
15:57 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Richard Guenther
15:41 Re: Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Paolo Bonzini
15:25 Scheduling an early complete loop unrolling pass? Richard Guenther
15:15 Re: build failure? (libgfortran) Bruce Korb
14:52 Re: GCC 4.1.2 Status Report Richard Guenther
14:42 Re: build failure? (libgfortran) Richard Guenther
14:24 Re: bugzilla error Daniel Berlin
09:30 Re: gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem Paolo Bonzini
08:26 Re: build failure? (libgfortran) Dorit Nuzman
07:16 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Gerald Pfeifer
06:18 Re: build failure? (libgfortran) Grigory Zagorodnev
06:15 GCC 4.1.2 Status Report Mark Mitchell
05:31 Re: The GCC Mission Statement says nothing about conforming to international standards!? Brooks Moses
02:05 The GCC Mission Statement says nothing about conforming to international standards!? icrashedtheinternet
01:34 Re: Seeking advice on front ends Paul Brook

February 04, 2007
22:36 Seeking advice on front ends Yannick Gingras
22:30 Build failure in libgfortran (PR 30678) Thomas Koenig
22:07 build failure? (libgfortran) Dorit Nuzman
11:06 Re: Some hints on solving this problem? Paul Yuan
09:29 Re: The GCC Mission Statement says nothing about conforming to international standards!? Robert Dewar
08:17 Re: Some hints on solving this problem? 吴曦
05:49 Re: About Gcc tree tutorials Brooks Moses
05:35 Re: Some hints on solving this problem? Paul Yuan
01:59 Re: The GCC Mission Statement says nothing about conforming to international standards!? Joe Buck

February 03, 2007
23:42 GCC 4.0.4 Released Gabriel Dos Reis
16:59 [LWOW] INWESTYCYJNE INTERESY W UKRAINIE : 24 - 26 lutego 2007 r., Lwow, Ukraina gcc@gcc.gnu.org Jozy
14:09 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Marco Trudel
13:17 Re: About Gcc tree tutorials Rafael EspÃndola
11:50 Some hints on solving this problem? 吴曦
09:49 Re: The GCC Mission Statement says nothing about conforming to international standards!? Robert Dewar
09:49 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Gerald Pfeifer
08:42 The GCC Mission Statement says nothing about conforming to international standards!? icrashedtheinternet
03:48 Re: How to get rid of attribute(mode(word))? Eric Christopher
02:03 Re: gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem Ralf Wildenhues
01:50 Re: How to get rid of attribute(mode(word))? Ian Lance Taylor
01:14 Re: not building? Mike Stump
00:35 Re: gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem Joe Buck
00:15 Re: gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem Mark Mitchell

February 02, 2007
23:36 Re: How to get rid of attribute(mode(word))? Eric Christopher
22:47 gcc-4.3-20070202 is now available gccadmin
20:51 Re: not building? Benjamin Kosnik
19:26 Re: not building? H. J. Lu
19:20 not building? Mike Stump
16:54 Re: gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem Joe Buck
16:22 Re: gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem Eric Botcazou
14:37 gcc-4.1.2 RC1 build problem Kate Minola
13:56 Re: Disabling bootstrap Paulo J. Matos
12:15 Re: Disabling bootstrap Zdenek Dvorak
12:02 PL/I for GCC version 0.0.14 release henrik . sorensen
11:46 Disabling bootstrap Paulo J. Matos
08:54 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Paolo Bonzini
01:43 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Gerald Pfeifer

February 01, 2007
21:25 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Andrew Pinski
21:19 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Gerald Pfeifer
18:00 Re: (OffTopic) trouble registering on www.gccsummit.org Janis Johnson
17:05 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Tom Tromey
16:00 Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression. David Daney
15:53 Re: trunk rev121458 dont bootstrap H. J. Lu
15:35 Re: Interesting build failure on trunk Richard Guenther
15:31 Re: Interesting build failure on trunk Ismail DÃnmez
14:42 Re: After GIMPLE... Paulo J. Matos
14:26 Re: After GIMPLE... Diego Novillo
10:10 (OffTopic) trouble registering on www.gccsummit.org Basile STARYNKEVITCH
09:57 Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression. Andrew Haley
09:50 Re: Use of INSN_CODE Steven Bosscher
09:39 Use of INSN_CODE Pranav Bhandarkar
09:38 Re: After GIMPLE... Paulo J. Matos
09:36 Fwd: Compiling GCC Paulo J. Matos
09:12 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Marco Trudel
07:03 trunk rev121458 dont bootstrap Basile STARYNKEVITCH
05:35 Arithmetic conversions between two different data types Mohamed Shafi
02:16 Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression. David Daney
02:13 Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression. David Daney

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3