This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:50:34 +0000
Subject: Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine
Newsgroups: 1170237483.3428.7.camel@hermans.wildebeest.org">1170237483.3428.7.camel@hermans.wildebeest.org
References: <45C080F8.10400@redhat.com>

Benjamin Kosnik writes:
 > 
 > I am somewhat concerned with the response of the java maintainers
 > (and others) that it's OK to require >512MB to bootstrap gcc with
 > java, or that make times "WORKSFORME."

Well, I didn't say that, so I hope you aren't referring to me.  But
before we do anything we need to know more about the machine on which
it failed.

Ultimately, it's a question of what we consider to be a reasonable
machine on which to build libgcj.  I don't know the answer to that.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine
  - From: Marcin Dalecki

References:
- Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]