This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine


Tom Tromey writes:
 > >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
 > 
 > Andrew> Anyway, I tried again, this time with the right file, and it took
 > Andrew> 78.67user 1.29system 1:20.01elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
 > Andrew> and indeed, it does want a lot of memory - at peak some 550m.  It'll
 > Andrew> be smaller on a 32-bit box, but not much smaller.
 > 
 > I suppose with some awful build hacking we could split this .o into
 > multiple parts.  I'm fine with the situation as it is, myself, but I
 > will do this if the consensus is that we should.

I'd want a bit more information.  There's no reason that a 512M box
couldn't cope with a 550M process.  Sure, it'll be slow, but it should
still work, and this is an extreme case.  If there is to be a maximum
process size during building, we need to make a sane decision about
what that size should be.

Andrew.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]