This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Robert Schwebel <r dot schwebel at pengutronix dot de>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:51:44 -0800
Subject: Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1
References: <45BEB63C.90701@codesourcery.com> <20070130111253.GK28808@pengutronix.de> <45BFF036.5030501@codesourcery.com> <200701310137.22649.paul@codesourcery.com>

Paul Brook wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 January 2007 01:26, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>> Robert Schwebel wrote:
>>> What about PR28516, would it be acceptable for 4.1.2?
>> There are two issues:
>>
>> (1) it's not marked as a 4.1 regression, let alone a regression from
>> 4.1.x.  Did this test case work with older versions of GCC?
> 
> 4.1 is the first FSF release to support arm-linux-gnueabi (the bug only 
> effects eabi targets).  The bug is preset in 4.0, but apparently noone other 
> than glibc uses nested functions with -fexceptions.

OK; in that case, I don't think this qualifies as a regression from a
previous 4.1.x release.  But, I'd certainly consider it within the
discretion of the ARM maintainers to put this patch on the 4.1 branch
after 4.1.2 is out, as it's a simple ARM-only patch.  That assumes, of
course, that everyone agrees about the GAS issue.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

References:
- GCC 4.1.2 RC1
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1
  - From: Robert Schwebel
- Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1
  - From: Paul Brook

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]