This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1

From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Robert Schwebel <r dot schwebel at pengutronix dot de>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:37:21 +0000
Subject: Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1
References: <45BEB63C.90701@codesourcery.com> <20070130111253.GK28808@pengutronix.de> <45BFF036.5030501@codesourcery.com>

On Wednesday 31 January 2007 01:26, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Robert Schwebel wrote:
> > What about PR28516, would it be acceptable for 4.1.2?
>
> There are two issues:
>
> (1) it's not marked as a 4.1 regression, let alone a regression from
> 4.1.x.  Did this test case work with older versions of GCC?

4.1 is the first FSF release to support arm-linux-gnueabi (the bug only 
effects eabi targets).  The bug is preset in 4.0, but apparently noone other 
than glibc uses nested functions with -fexceptions.

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- GCC 4.1.2 RC1
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1
  - From: Robert Schwebel
- Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]