This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?!

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, dnovillo at redhat dot com, jakub at redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:05:08 -0800
Subject: Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?!
References: <200701280026.32707.steven@gcc.gnu.org> <84fc9c000701271543k7c8c0d0qcbb61f183c55f875@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:43:36AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >Can you explain what went through your mind when you picked the
> >tree_exp.complexity field for something implemented new...  :-(
> 
> Not much...
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01117.html
> 
> "... but my brain isn't working anymore."

(Did my mailer miss the original message?  This thread
seems to start with Richard's reply...)

Pretty much I couldn't think of anything else reasonable
at the time.  I figured that when the time *did* come to
actually remove that field, we'd think of something.

r~

References:
- G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?!
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?!
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]