This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
> I'm exactly talking about the semantics of "undefined" here. It would
> be immensely reassuring if a compiler would at least interpret this as
> "unspecified, but consistent". Even better would be a defined and
> documented semantics for everything left undefined by the standard.
Are you proposing to define an default initial value for all uninitialized
variables?