This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Paulo J. Matos" <pocm at soton dot ac dot uk>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:13:56 -0500
Subject: Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?
References: <11b141710701240944i520edabchaa2fbb25cb278a47@mail.gmail.com> <45B7AEE2.30605@redhat.com> <11b141710701260352p374bfec7n469252a118a125c6@mail.gmail.com> <45B9EEFB.3030301@redhat.com> <84fc9c000701260428k7cfade1bh42ebd69c199787d7@mail.gmail.com>

Richard Guenther wrote on 01/26/07 07:28:

It's after doing TER, so the statements are no longer valid GIMPLE statements.

Silly me. Richard's right. You want the output of -fdump-tree-uncprop. That's the last GIMPLE dump (if my memory doesn't fail me again).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?
  - From: Paulo J. Matos

References:
- Which optimization levels affect gimple?
  - From: Paulo J. Matos
- Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?
  - From: Paulo J. Matos
- Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]