This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?

From: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Paulo J. Matos" <pocm at soton dot ac dot uk>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:28:31 +0100
Subject: Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?
References: <11b141710701240944i520edabchaa2fbb25cb278a47@mail.gmail.com> <45B7AEE2.30605@redhat.com> <11b141710701260352p374bfec7n469252a118a125c6@mail.gmail.com> <45B9EEFB.3030301@redhat.com>

On 1/26/07, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:

Paulo J. Matos wrote on 01/26/07 06:52:

> Is the output of -fdump-tree-optimized a subset of GIMPLE?
>
Yes.  The output is an incomplete textual representation of the GIMPLE
form of the program.

It's after doing TER, so the statements are no longer valid GIMPLE statements.

Richard.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?
  - From: Paulo J. Matos

References:
- Which optimization levels affect gimple?
  - From: Paulo J. Matos
- Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?
  - From: Paulo J. Matos
- Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple?
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]