This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context

From: Andreas Bogk <andreas at andreas dot org>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:15:57 +0100
Subject: Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
References: <45B585D1.1080202@andreas.org> <m3ejpm8hk0.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <45B5C12C.4030003@andreas.org> <4aca3dc20701230845l48940calc762194cd5f029c8@mail.gmail.com> <45B64108.9020603@andreas.org> <m3ac097iy6.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <45B68F80.5080701@andreas.org> <10701240158.AA23895@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <ep70gd$ftg$1@sea.gmane.org> <10701241251.AA00849@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <20070124184618.GA6607@synopsys.com> <10701250009.AA16048@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <45B894F1.6000802@andreas.org> <10701251200.AA25124@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>

Richard Kenner wrote:
> I agree with all the arguments about legacy code, but I'm much less
> tolerant of such arguments for NEW code.

Thanks for clarification.  I think legacy code is the big problem here
anyways.

Andreas

References:
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: Andreas Bogk
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: Andreas Bogk
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: Andreas Bogk
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: Andreas Bogk
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: James Dennett
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: Andreas Bogk
- Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context
  - From: Richard Kenner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]