This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer

From: Marcin Dalecki <martin at dalecki dot de>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: david dot carlton at sun dot com (David Carlton), gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:52:43 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer
References: <200701242226.l0OMQWwx013892@localhost.localdomain>

WiadomoÅÄ napisana w dniu 2007-01-24, o godz23:26, przez Andrew Pinski:

On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 03:02:19 +0100, Marcin Dalecki <martin@dalecki.de> said:
That's largely because individual tests in the test suite are too
long, which in turn is because the tests are testing code at a
per-binary granularity: you have to run all of gcc, or all of one
of the programs invoked by gcc, to do a single test.  (Is that true?
Please correct me if I'm wrong.)
No, they are almost all 1 or 2 functions long, nothing more than 20 lines. The larger testcases are really testing the library parts rather than GCC itself.

Hugh? I guess this wasn't intentional. But please don't make sentences by abbreviation change attribution. It makes me look more GCC "innocent" then actually true ...

â Marcin Dalecki â

References:
- Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]