This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:21:02 +0100
Subject: Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701142156560.4862@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <45AA9E97.5070200@suse.de> <6c33472e0701141448t7582f53ejf05bc82fd8754760@mail.gmail.com> <45AAB7B3.5000606@suse.de> <6c33472e0701141513o10726ebdj44fd3c12ed3800ae@mail.gmail.com>

Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:

The casts should avoid the warnings and using Wno-conversion also.

To be clear: we *cannot* ask the users to avoid Wconversion with the library or whatever other warning only because our pragma system header is weak with templates, or the compiler overzealous. I agree that we need a clean resolution of the issue.

Paolo.

References:
- -Wconversion versus libstdc++
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez
- Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]