Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>]

Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:

> > By the way, "new" also wrt current 4_2-branch, in the sense that the
> > latter doesn't emit *any* overflow warning for the snippet in 30465,
> > with explicit -Wconversion too...
>
> And it does with Wconversion? Wconversion should not emit any overflow
> warning, that is responsibility of Woverflow.

Of course I meant -Woverflow, just a typo, sorry. In short, in my 
limited experience, there is no way to convince either 4.1 or 4.2 to 
emit such warnings for that snippet (on the other hand, current 4.3 
emits *two*)

Paolo.