This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi

From: "Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez" <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
To: chris dot pickett at mail dot mcgill dot ca
Cc: "Gerald Pfeifer" <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, "Gabriel Dos Reis" <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:57:06 +0000
Subject: Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi
References: <4543D05A.7080303@mail.mcgill.ca> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0701060057040.31555@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <45A55AA7.3060804@mail.mcgill.ca> <45A55F8D.3000702@mail.mcgill.ca>

On 10/01/07, Chris Pickett <chris.pickett@mail.mcgill.ca> wrote:

Chris Pickett wrote:
> I have a question: does -Wextra now imply -Wconversion since
> -Wconversion was split into -Wconversion and -Wtraditional-conversion?

I mistakenly thought it was under -Wextra.  So the question should be,
does -Wtraditional now imply -Wtraditional-conversion since -Wconversion
was split into -Wconversion and -Wtraditional-conversion?

The documentation does not say so, I just wanted to check.


No, it doesn't. Some of the warnings produced by Wtraditional are also
produced by Wtraditional-conversion but none of them produce all the
warnings enabled by the other.

References:
- Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi
  - From: Chris Pickett
- Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi
  - From: Chris Pickett

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]