Re: Top level libgcc checked in

[Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>]

Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > > We should also be very careful not to introduce differences between
> > > native and cross compilers.  So, we should have no run-time tests, no
> > > tests that look at /proc, headers in /usr/include, etc.
> > Right--I was really only suggesting tests that can be done at
> > compile-time.  Perhaps there isn't a lot of room for improvement after
> > all.
>
> The only test I can think of that could be improved if it is not already
> done, is the check for visibility support.

In fact that's already done. :-)

I'm sure that a few other changes can be made, such as sizeof tests. 
These however are less interesting than untangling the config files.

Paolo