This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- To: Vladimir Yanovsky <volodyan at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Vladimir Yanovsky <yanov at il dot ibm dot com>, Ayal Zaks <zaks at il dot ibm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:19:08 +0100
- Subject: Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
- References: <48ee23ef0612181248l255833bcjd529c1651aef7a28@mail.gmail.com> <20061218205823.GA2339@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <48ee23ef0612190443q59f0937cp4eceeb1c579bb77a@mail.gmail.com> <20061230120026.GA28965@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <48ee23ef0612310415r5f286d9fk68ac5c21f2d5c4d6@mail.gmail.com>
> Hi,
> Sorry for possibly causing confusion. I had tested the patch on my ICE
> testcase and bootstrapped for -enable-languages=C, but didn't run the
> full bootstrap. Bootstrapping the latest Andrew's patch on ppc-linux
> and testing it on SPU.
Vladimir,
I bootstrapped/regtested the patch myself on i686 before commiting it,
so the rule was met here. Unfortunately i686 don't seems to show the
regression. I've bootstrapped/regtested x86_64 and i686 with Andrew's
patch and it works all fine.
Honza