gcc archive
date index for January, 2007

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

January 31, 2007
22:56 Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression. David Daney
22:44 gcc-4.2-20070131 is now available gccadmin
21:04 Re: After GIMPLE... Diego Novillo
20:00 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Tom Tromey
18:36 Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression. David Daney
18:02 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Tom Tromey
17:39 libstdc++: abi_check fails due to lacking long double arithmetic functions Andreas Krebbel
16:41 Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression. Tom Tromey
16:26 Re: After GIMPLE... Paulo J. Matos
14:10 Re: After GIMPLE... Diego Novillo
13:24 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Robert Dewar
13:15 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Marcin Dalecki
11:51 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Andrew Haley
11:49 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Jakub Jelinek
11:44 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Richard Earnshaw
11:43 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Benjamin Kosnik
11:42 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Andrew Haley
10:52 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Andrew Haley
10:08 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Basile STARYNKEVITCH
09:58 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Mark Wielaard
09:47 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Andrew Haley
09:45 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Andrew Haley
09:45 Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression. Andrew Haley
09:26 Re: Interesting build failure on trunk Ismail DÃnmez
08:50 Re: debugging capabilities on AIX ? Olivier Hainque
08:16 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Paolo Bonzini
08:10 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Marco Trudel
07:41 Re: MIPS Wrong-code regression. Richard Sandiford
06:41 MIPS Wrong-code regression. David Daney
02:51 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Mark Mitchell
02:48 Re: GCC 4.1 Branch Frozen in Preparation for GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Mark Mitchell
02:18 Re: Signed into overflow behavior in the security context Robert Dewar
01:58 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Gerald Pfeifer
01:37 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Paul Brook
01:26 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Mark Mitchell
01:22 Re: GCC 4.1 Branch Frozen in Preparation for GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Joseph S. Myers
01:19 Re: GCC 4.1 Branch Frozen in Preparation for GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Mark Mitchell
00:25 Re: [PATCH for] Re: gcc-4.0-20070128 is now available Serge Belyshev

January 30, 2007
22:06 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Tom Tromey
21:16 Re: Interesting build failure on trunk Eric Botcazou
21:11 Re: Interesting build failure on trunk David Daney
21:07 Re: Interesting build failure on trunk Ismail DÃnmez
19:52 Re: Interesting build failure on trunk Ismail DÃnmez
19:43 Re: Interesting build failure on trunk Eric Botcazou
19:33 Re: Interesting build failure on trunk Ismail DÃnmez
19:04 Re: Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack? François-Xavier Coudert
18:51 Re: Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack? Geoffrey Keating
18:48 Re: GCC 4.1 Branch Frozen in Preparation for GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
18:38 How to get rid of attribute(mode(word))? Andreas Krebbel
18:08 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Paul Brook
17:28 Re: Interesting build failure on trunk Eric Botcazou
16:49 Re: Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack? Ian Lance Taylor
16:44 Re: Interesting build failure on trunk Ian Lance Taylor
16:42 Re: Signed into overflow behavior in the security context Gabriel Paubert
16:13 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Richard Henderson
16:06 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Robert Dewar
16:05 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Richard Henderson
16:04 Re: Signed into overflow behavior in the security context Robert Dewar
15:49 Re: Signed into overflow behavior in the security context Robert Dewar
15:19 Re: Signed into overflow behavior in the security context Georg Bauhaus
15:11 Re: After GIMPLE... Paulo J. Matos
14:08 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Andrew Haley
13:06 Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack? François-Xavier Coudert
12:59 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
12:22 Re: Signed into overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
12:10 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Marco Trudel
12:02 Re: Signed into overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
12:02 Interesting build failure on trunk Ismail DÃnmez
11:47 Re: Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Andrew Haley
11:44 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Robert Schwebel
11:38 Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine Gerald Pfeifer
11:16 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Rene Rebe
11:12 Re: GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Robert Schwebel
10:23 Re: After GIMPLE... Paulo J. Matos
10:21 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Paulo J. Matos
10:11 Re: Does anyone recognize this --enable-checking=all bootstrap failure? Richard Guenther
09:17 Re: Interprocedural optimization question Ramon Bertran Monfort
08:58 Does anyone recognize this --enable-checking=all bootstrap failure? Brooks Moses
08:06 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Brooks Moses
07:37 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Paolo Bonzini
05:44 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Robert Dewar
05:34 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context James Dennett
05:25 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Jarc
05:24 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context James Dennett
04:55 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
03:47 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Jarc
03:06 GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Mark Mitchell
02:55 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
00:39 Re: [PATCH for] Re: gcc-4.0-20070128 is now available Gabriel Dos Reis

January 29, 2007
23:29 Re: Gcc Cross Compile Ben Elliston
23:18 Gcc Cross Compile idipous
22:44 gcc-4.1-20070129 is now available gccadmin
22:28 [PATCH for] Re: gcc-4.0-20070128 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
21:47 GCC-4.0.4 prerelease Gabriel Dos Reis
21:01 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Richard Guenther
20:59 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Eric Botcazou
20:40 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Richard Guenther
20:32 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Mark Mitchell
20:20 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Steven Bosscher
20:18 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Steven Bosscher
19:53 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Mark Mitchell
19:39 Re: After GIMPLE... Ian Lance Taylor
19:28 Re: Interprocedural optimization question Daniel Berlin
19:17 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Daniel Berlin
19:10 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! David Edelsohn
18:55 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Joe Buck
17:57 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Andrew Pinski
17:34 Re: 2007 GCC Developers Summit Zdenek Dvorak
17:21 Re: 2007 GCC Developers Summit Seongbae Park
17:17 After GIMPLE... Paulo J. Matos
17:16 Re: [c++] switch ( enum ) vs. default statment. Mark Mitchell
17:01 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Daniel Berlin
17:00 [PATCH]: Fix hang while compiling cpu2k6/perlbench at -O2 Daniel Berlin
16:48 Re: Trunk GCC fails to compile cpu2k6/dealII at -O2 Daniel Berlin
14:25 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Steven Bosscher
13:44 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Joseph S. Myers
13:41 Trunk GCC fails to compile cpu2k6/dealII at -O2 Grigory Zagorodnev
13:20 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Paolo Bonzini
12:58 Re: Trunk GCC hangs while compiling cpu2k6/perlbench at -O2 Grigory Zagorodnev
12:45 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Diego Novillo
12:06 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 tbp
11:51 RE: Interprocedural optimization question Razya Ladelsky
11:46 Re: Ada and the TREE_COMPLEXITY field on struct tree_exp Steven Bosscher
11:44 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Steven Bosscher
11:35 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Paulo J. Matos
11:25 java: mark calls to external fndecls DECL_EXTERNAL Andrew Haley
11:06 Re: [c++] switch ( enum ) vs. default statment. Manuel López-Ibáñez
10:22 Trunk GCC hangs while compiling cpu2k6/perlbench at -O2 Grigory Zagorodnev
09:53 Interprocedural optimization question Ramon Bertran Monfort
09:47 Re: 2007 GCC Developers Summit Diego Novillo
09:36 Re: [c++] switch ( enum ) vs. default statment. Paweł Sikora
07:08 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Diego Novillo
07:03 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Diego Novillo
04:54 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 Vladimir N. Makarov
03:28 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Joe Buck
03:15 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context James Dennett
02:40 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
01:48 Re: gcc-4.0-20070128 is now available Joe Buck
01:04 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context James Dennett
00:59 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Gerald Pfeifer
00:56 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Jarc
00:43 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie

January 28, 2007
23:47 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 Mark Mitchell
23:45 Re: gcc 4.1.1: char *p = "str" puts "str" into rodata Andrew Pinski
23:41 Re: gcc 4.1.1: char *p = "str" puts "str" into rodata Ray Hurst
23:08 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Paulo J. Matos
23:04 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Paulo J. Matos
23:04 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Paulo J. Matos
23:03 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Paulo J. Matos
23:02 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Paulo J. Matos
22:55 Re: 2007 GCC Developers Summit Ben Elliston
22:42 gcc-4.0-20070128 is now available gccadmin
22:19 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 tbp
21:59 Re: Bootstrap failure in libjava... David Daney
21:44 Re: Bootstrap failure in libjava... Andrew Pinski
21:41 Bootstrap failure in libjava... David Daney
20:54 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 Jan Hubicka
20:30 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 tbp
19:53 GCC 4.1 Branch Frozen in Preparation for GCC 4.1.2 RC1 Mark Mitchell
19:50 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 Jan Hubicka
19:40 Re: [c++] switch ( enum ) vs. default statment. Mark Mitchell
19:20 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 Mark Mitchell
19:13 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 Richard Guenther
19:09 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 Jan Hubicka
18:56 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 Mark Mitchell
18:49 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Mark Mitchell
18:04 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Jarc
18:03 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 tbp
17:00 The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.12 is released H. J. Lu
16:09 Re: gcc 4.1.1: char *p = "str" puts "str" into rodata Richard Guenther
15:59 gcc 4.1.1: char *p = "str" puts "str" into rodata Denis Vlasenko
15:31 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 Jan Hubicka
14:48 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 tbp
14:40 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 tbp
13:28 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 Jan Hubicka
13:26 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 Jan Hubicka
13:24 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 tbp
12:30 Re: remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 Richard Guenther
09:04 remarks about g++ 4.3 and some comparison to msvc & icc on ia32 tbp
07:16 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
07:05 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
06:40 build failure, gcc-4.3-20070126 snapshot, cygwin tbp
06:40 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Jarc
06:15 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
05:47 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context James Dennett
05:43 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
05:11 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Robert Dewar
05:06 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Robert Dewar
05:05 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
05:03 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Robert Dewar
04:12 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Brooks Moses
03:21 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
01:31 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Robert Dewar
01:06 GCC 4.2 Release notes are almost empty Manuel López-Ibáñez
00:26 Re: How to enforce the use of libjava/scripts/jar? Gerald Pfeifer

January 27, 2007
23:43 Re: G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Richard Guenther
23:23 Re: Ada and the TREE_COMPLEXITY field on struct tree_exp Steven Bosscher
23:23 G++ OpenMP implementation uses TREE_COMPLEXITY?!?! Steven Bosscher
22:55 Re: Can C and C++ object files be linked into an executable? David Daney
22:02 Re: Can C and C++ object files be linked into an executable? Diego Novillo
21:53 Re: How to enforce the use of libjava/scripts/jar? Gerald Pfeifer
21:48 Re: Can C and C++ object files be linked into an executable? Ray Hurst
20:12 Re: Can C and C++ object files be linked into an executable? Ferad Zyulkyarov
20:10 GCC-4.0.4 Gabriel Dos Reis
19:32 Re: Can C and C++ object files be linked into an executable? Ian Lance Taylor
18:49 Top level libgcc migration tips Daniel Jacobowitz
18:02 Re: Can C and C++ object files be linked into an executable? Ray Hurst
16:23 Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
14:38 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Florian Weimer
13:35 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Richard Guenther
13:19 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Richard Kenner
13:18 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Richard Kenner
11:09 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Georg Bauhaus
04:09 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Robert Dewar
03:38 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Ian Lance Taylor
03:28 LTO Status Mark Mitchell
03:06 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
02:35 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
01:58 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Joe Buck
01:48 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
01:39 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context David Daney
01:22 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
01:18 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
01:11 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Tom Tromey
00:50 Re: Can C and C++ object files be linked into an executable? Joe Buck
00:34 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Seongbae Park
00:30 Re: Can C and C++ object files be linked into an executable? Ray Hurst
00:24 Re: reading binarys Ray Hurst
00:20 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Robert Dewar
00:12 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
00:12 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Joe Buck
00:08 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Robert Dewar
00:05 Re: Can C and C++ object files be linked into an executable? Mike Stump
00:00 Can C and C++ object files be linked into an executable? Ray Hurst

January 26, 2007
23:57 Re: Signed int overflow behavior in the security context Paul Schlie
23:47 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Daniel Berlin
23:43 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
23:21 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Robert Dewar
22:46 gcc-4.3-20070126 is now available gccadmin
22:38 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Joe Buck
22:24 Re: Possible build problems with the "current" gcc George R Goffe
22:20 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Mike Stump
22:19 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Brooks Moses
21:34 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
19:39 Re: reading binarys Jason Erickson
19:16 Re: Possible build problems with the "current" gcc Andrew Haley
17:29 Re: RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Manuel López-Ibáñez
16:59 Re: Possible build problems with the "current" gcc David Daney
16:25 Re: RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Gabriel Dos Reis
15:14 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Diego Novillo
12:28 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Richard Guenther
12:11 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Diego Novillo
11:53 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Paulo J. Matos
10:27 RFC: cross-compile failure in gcc/config/host-linux.c Peter S. Mazinger
04:11 The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.11 is released H. J. Lu
04:08 Re: Possible build problems with the "current" gcc H. J. Lu
03:22 Possible build problems with the "current" gcc George R Goffe
00:35 Re: Possible build problems with the "current" gcc Joe Buck
00:21 Possible build problems with the "current" gcc George R Goffe

January 25, 2007
23:05 Re: reading binarys Jason Erickson
22:27 Re: reading binarys Mike Stump
22:11 reading binarys Jason Erickson
21:43 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Mark Mitchell
21:32 Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status Richard Guenther
21:29 Re: gcc compile time support for assumptions Diego Novillo
21:19 Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status Volker Reichelt
19:41 RE: RE: char should be signed by default Meissner, Michael
19:31 Re: subreg_get_info vs mode restrictions in registers? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
19:26 Re: 2007 GCC Developers Summit Joe Buck
19:23 Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
19:20 Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status Joe Buck
19:14 Re: GCC4 makes off by ones more exploitable again, misuse of padding? Joe Buck
19:14 Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
19:05 Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status Richard Guenther
19:02 Re: GCC4 makes off by ones more exploitable again, misuse of padding? In Cognito
18:54 Re: RE: char should be signed by default devils_advocate
18:47 RE: [OT] char should be signed by default Meissner, Michael
18:36 Re: 2007 GCC Developers Summit Janis Johnson
17:35 Re: initialization and enums in new version of gcc Ian Lance Taylor
17:30 Re: GCC4 makes off by ones more exploitable again, misuse of padding? Denis Vlasenko
17:26 initialization and enums in new version of gcc Laura Tardivo
17:21 Re: RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Gabriel Dos Reis
17:21 Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
17:20 Re: RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:17 Re: RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Gabriel Dos Reis
17:14 Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
16:42 Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status Volker Reichelt
16:38 Re: GCC-4.0.4 release status Richard Guenther
16:29 GCC-4.0.4 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
15:42 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Diego Novillo
15:25 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Robert Dewar
15:10 RE: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Dave Korn
15:09 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Richard Guenther
15:04 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Steven Bosscher
15:01 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer H. J. Lu
14:57 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Robert Dewar
14:18 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer H. J. Lu
12:16 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
12:14 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Robert Dewar
12:11 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
12:11 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Robert Dewar
11:55 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Richard Kenner
11:49 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Steven Bosscher
11:31 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
10:43 Re: [OT] char should be signed by default Gabriel Paubert
10:18 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer François-Xavier Coudert
09:29 Re: char should be signed by default Paolo Bonzini
06:23 Re: subreg_get_info vs mode restrictions in registers? Ian Lance Taylor
05:09 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Mark Mitchell
03:39 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Brooks Moses
01:39 Re: subreg_get_info vs mode restrictions in registers? DJ Delorie
01:36 Re: transfre from c to MIPS Mike Stump
00:51 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Robert Dewar
00:48 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Robert Dewar
00:43 Re: GCC4 makes off by ones more exploitable again, misuse of padding? In Cognito
00:37 Re: GCC4 makes off by ones more exploitable again, misuse of padding? Denis Vlasenko
00:22 GCC4 makes off by ones more exploitable again, misuse of padding? In Cognito
00:14 Re: subreg_get_info vs mode restrictions in registers? DJ Delorie
00:03 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Richard Kenner
00:00 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Marcin Dalecki

January 24, 2007
23:54 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Marcin Dalecki
23:35 Re: subreg_get_info vs mode restrictions in registers? DJ Delorie
23:13 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer David Carlton
22:52 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Mike Stump
22:50 gcc-4.2-20070124 is now available gccadmin
22:26 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Andrew Pinski
22:19 transfre from c to MIPS meltem
22:09 Jakub Jelinek as libgomp maintainer Jason Merrill
21:42 Re: subreg_get_info vs mode restrictions in registers? DJ Delorie
21:38 Re: gcc/unwind-pe.h broken Marco Trudel
21:35 Re: subreg_get_info vs mode restrictions in registers? Ian Lance Taylor
21:14 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Marcin Dalecki
21:11 2007 GCC Developers Summit Andrew J. Hutton
21:02 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer David Carlton
20:57 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer David Carlton
20:42 subreg_get_info vs mode restrictions in registers? DJ Delorie
20:41 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer David Carlton
19:45 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Tom Tromey
19:20 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Mike Stump
19:20 RE: variable-sized array fields in structure? Meissner, Michael
19:10 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Marcin Dalecki
19:09 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Diego Novillo
18:53 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Mike Stump
18:48 RE: char should be signed by default Meissner, Michael
18:46 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Joe Buck
18:42 another bug in for m6812, unable to find a register to spill Sean D'Epagnier
18:24 gcc/unwind-pe.h broken Marco Trudel
17:57 Re: Which optimization levels affect gimple? Ian Lance Taylor
17:45 Which optimization levels affect gimple? Paulo J. Matos
16:49 Re: char should be signed by default devils_advocate
15:33 Re: variable-sized array fields in structure? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:29 variable-sized array fields in structure? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:25 Re: [mem-ssa] Updated documentation Diego Novillo
14:55 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Marcin Dalecki
13:05 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Michael Veksler
12:45 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Richard Kenner
10:18 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Richard Guenther
10:10 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Marcin Dalecki
09:12 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Michael Veksler
09:08 Re: About Gcc tree tutorials Ferad Zyulkyarov
07:06 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context James Dennett
07:05 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Marcin Dalecki
06:56 Re: Level to do such a modification... Ben Elliston
06:05 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Brooks Moses
05:58 Re: Level to do such a modification... 吴曦
05:49 Re: Level to do such a modification... 吴曦
05:31 Re: char should be signed by default Andrew Pinski
05:19 char should be signed by default devils_advocate
05:06 Re: Level to do such a modification... Nicholas Nethercote
05:02 Re: Level to do such a modification... 吴曦
04:52 Re: Level to do such a modification... Nicholas Nethercote
04:16 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Andrew Pinski
03:39 Level to do such a modification... 吴曦
03:31 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Andrew Pinski
02:04 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Marcin Dalecki
01:53 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Richard Kenner
01:30 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer David Carlton
01:25 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Marcin Dalecki
00:49 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer David Daney
00:46 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Richard Kenner
00:37 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Joe Buck
00:20 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Marcin Dalecki

January 23, 2007
23:55 Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Steven Bosscher
22:54 [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer Diego Novillo
22:43 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
22:03 Re: raising minimum version of Flex Mark Kettenis
21:29 Re: RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:02 Re: About building conditional expressions Ferad Zyulkyarov
20:53 Re: About building conditional expressions Tom Tromey
20:17 Re: RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Joe Buck
20:14 Re: [c++] switch ( enum ) vs. default statment. David Nicol
19:52 Re: RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:20 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Mark Mitchell
19:17 [c++] switch ( enum ) vs. default statment. PaweÅ Sikora
18:55 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Florian Weimer
17:33 Re: bug management: WAITING bugs that have timed out Mark Mitchell
17:27 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Ian Lance Taylor
17:08 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
16:46 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Daniel Berlin
14:31 Re: ED_tiler Jefferson Wilczynski
14:30 Re: ED_tiler Jasmin Willits
13:46 Re: order of local variables in stack frame Markus Franke
13:34 Re: About building conditional expressions Ferad Zyulkyarov
13:30 Re: About building conditional expressions Steven Bosscher
13:27 Re: order of local variables in stack frame Andrew Haley
13:25 About building conditional expressions Ferad Zyulkyarov
13:20 Re: order of local variables in stack frame Robert Dewar
13:15 order of local variables in stack frame Markus Franke
08:41 Re: raising minimum version of Flex Paolo Bonzini
08:03 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
04:59 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Ian Lance Taylor
04:20 Re: raising minimum version of Flex Ben Elliston
03:50 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
00:08 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Joe Buck

January 22, 2007
23:48 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
23:39 Re: raising minimum version of Flex Mike Stump
22:51 Re: raising minimum version of Flex Ben Elliston
22:42 gcc-4.1-20070122 is now available gccadmin
21:23 Re: Gcc-4.1.1: Build error for arm-target Thomas Meyer
20:34 Re: Gcc-4.1.1: Build error for arm-target Thomas Meyer
20:20 Re: Gcc-4.1.1: Build error for arm-target Thomas Meyer
20:03 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Joe Buck
19:47 The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.10 is released H. J. Lu
19:40 Gcc-4.1.1: Build error for arm-target Thomas Meyer
19:17 Re: Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Ian Lance Taylor
18:55 Re: raising minimum version of Flex Joseph S. Myers
16:08 Re: raising minimum version of Flex Tom Tromey
14:01 Re: Getting a tree node for a field of a variable Ferad Zyulkyarov
13:50 Signed int overflow behaviour in the security context Andreas Bogk
13:07 Re: raising minimum version of Flex Marcin Dalecki
12:58 PART-TIME LUCRATIVE JOB OFFER!!!!! ARTLINKS ARTS AND CRAFTS INTER
12:24 Fix libgcj build failure on Alpha Andrew Haley
12:23 Re: raising minimum version of Flex Václav Haisman
11:06 Re: raising minimum version of Flex Gerald Pfeifer
07:49 Re: raising minimum version of Flex Ian Lance Taylor
07:20 Re: raising minimum version of Flex David Fang
07:06 Re: raising minimum version of Flex Steven Bosscher
06:14 Re: raising minimum version of Flex Ian Lance Taylor
06:11 Re: incorrect symlink on Darwin Eric Christopher
05:49 raising minimum version of Flex Ben Elliston

January 21, 2007
23:08 Re: Compiling libgcc functions with non-default LIBGCC2_UNITS_PER_WORD Daniel Jacobowitz
23:07 Re: How to enforce the use of libjava/scripts/jar? Andreas Schwab
23:06 Re: How to enforce the use of libjava/scripts/jar? Tom Tromey
22:42 How to enforce the use of libjava/scripts/jar? Gerald Pfeifer
22:41 gcc-4.0-20070121 is now available gccadmin
22:10 Re: Compiling libgcc functions with non-default LIBGCC2_UNITS_PER_WORD Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
19:00 Re: Compiling libgcc functions with non-default LIBGCC2_UNITS_PER_WORD Daniel Jacobowitz
13:53 Re: Preventing warnings Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:44 Re: Preventing warnings Robert Dewar
13:42 Re: Preventing warnings Eric Botcazou
13:39 Re: Preventing warnings Robert Dewar
13:32 Re: Preventing warnings Laurent GUERBY
12:38 Re: Preventing warnings Richard Kenner
12:10 LUCRATIVE JOB OFFER!!!!! ARTLINKS ARTS AND CULTURES
11:31 Re: Preventing warnings Paolo Bonzini
10:31 Re: trying to fix a bug in m6812 front-end Sean D'Epagnier
06:59 Re: Preventing warnings Andrew Pinski
06:50 Re: Preventing warnings Richard Stallman

January 20, 2007
17:28 Re: Top level libgcc checked in Andreas Schwab
17:15 Re: Top level libgcc checked in Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
15:30 Re: Running GCC tests on installed compiler Dominique Dhumieres
12:15 Compiling libgcc functions with non-default LIBGCC2_UNITS_PER_WORD Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
11:13 Re: trying to fix a bug in m6812 front-end Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
07:12 Re: innovative new build failure Andrew Pinski
05:26 Re: innovative new build failure Mike Stump
04:51 Re: innovative new build failure Ian Lance Taylor
04:46 Re: innovative new build failure Ian Lance Taylor
03:10 innovative new build failure Mike Stump
01:29 Re: trying to fix a bug in m6812 front-end Ian Lance Taylor
01:15 Re: Running GCC tests on installed compiler Gerald Pfeifer
00:43 trying to fix a bug in m6812 front-end Sean D'Epagnier

January 19, 2007
22:45 gcc-4.3-20070119 is now available gccadmin
21:04 [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html points to non-existing source http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-SVN/ Gerald Pfeifer
17:56 Re: Getting a tree node for a field of a variable Mike Stump
16:06 Re: Good book on C? http://publications.gbdirect.co.uk/c_book/ James Dennett
15:57 Re: Controlling Register Allocation - GCC 4.1.1 Ian Lance Taylor
15:34 Re: Controlling Register Allocation - GCC 4.1.1 Ian Lance Taylor
12:25 Re: Preventing warnings Manuel López-Ibáñez
11:42 Re: Getting a tree node for a field of a variable Ferad Zyulkyarov
10:44 Good book on C? http://publications.gbdirect.co.uk/c_book/ Richard Stallman
10:43 Re: Preventing warnings Richard Stallman
10:33 Controlling Register Allocation - GCC 4.1.1 Rohit Arul Raj
09:21 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Richard Guenther
07:03 about the float lib thomas.luo
06:43 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Roberto Bagnara
02:55 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Joe Buck

January 18, 2007
22:36 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
22:15 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Morten Welinder
20:42 Re: gcc doesn't build on ppc David Edelsohn
20:40 gcc doesn't build on ppc Mike Stump
20:15 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
20:13 Re: 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix Grigory Zagorodnev
19:55 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:38 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:35 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:35 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Robert Dewar
19:32 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:26 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:02 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Manuel López-Ibáñez
18:27 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
17:56 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:52 Re: Preventing warnings Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:32 Re: 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix H. J. Lu
17:28 Re: Preventing warnings Richard Stallman
17:10 Re: Where the languages meet... Paulo J. Matos
17:08 Re: Dumping gimple tree Paulo J. Matos
17:04 Dumping gimple tree Paulo J. Matos
16:45 Re: Getting a tree node for a field of a variable Ian Lance Taylor
16:40 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. Ramana Radhakrishnan
16:26 Re: gcc compile time support for assumptions Richard Guenther
16:19 Re: gcc compile time support for assumptions Gabriel Dos Reis
16:14 Re: gcc compile time support for assumptions Richard Guenther
16:10 Re: gcc compile time support for assumptions Robert Dewar
16:06 Re: gcc compile time support for assumptions Paolo Carlini
16:00 Re: gcc compile time support for assumptions Richard Guenther
15:55 Re: C Parser Robert Dewar
15:52 Re: gcc compile time support for assumptions Ian Lance Taylor
15:48 Getting a tree node for a field of a variable Ferad Zyulkyarov
15:44 Re: gcc compile time support for assumptions Andrew Haley
15:43 Re: Where the languages meet... Ian Lance Taylor
15:42 Re: C Parser Ian Lance Taylor
15:35 Re: gcc compile time support for assumptions Ian Lance Taylor
15:27 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
15:24 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
15:10 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. Pranav Bhandarkar
12:45 Re: Ada and the TREE_COMPLEXITY field on struct tree_exp Richard Kenner
12:41 Re: C Parser Lee Millward
12:22 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. Richard Kenner
12:18 Re: C Parser Ferad Zyulkyarov
12:16 Re: Ada and the TREE_COMPLEXITY field on struct tree_exp Steven Bosscher
12:12 Where the languages meet... Paulo J. Matos
12:10 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. Richard Kenner
12:06 Re: Ada and the TREE_COMPLEXITY field on struct tree_exp Richard Kenner
12:02 C Parser Paulo J. Matos
11:43 Re: lib{gomp,decnumber}/autom4te.cache Paolo Bonzini
11:16 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
10:58 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
10:58 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
09:37 gcc compile time support for assumptions Abramo Bagnara
09:16 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. Jeffrey Law
08:38 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. Steven Bosscher
08:35 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. Jeffrey Law
08:19 Ada and the TREE_COMPLEXITY field on struct tree_exp Steven Bosscher
07:14 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. pranav bhandarkar
07:07 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. pranav bhandarkar
03:24 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
03:18 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Mike Stump
02:46 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
02:31 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Mike Stump
02:09 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Joe Buck
02:00 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
01:51 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Andrew Pinski
01:42 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
01:19 incorrect symlink on Darwin Jack Howarth
01:07 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Manuel López-Ibáñez
01:05 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:50 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Joseph S. Myers
00:44 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
00:40 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:31 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions David Daney
00:26 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Manuel López-Ibáñez
00:25 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Paubert
00:24 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
00:19 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
00:15 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Ian Lance Taylor
00:01 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Manuel López-Ibáñez

January 17, 2007
23:59 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Manuel López-Ibáñez
23:42 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
23:41 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
23:40 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
23:19 lib{gomp,decnumber}/autom4te.cache FX Coudert
23:12 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Joe Buck
22:59 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
22:56 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
22:54 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
22:50 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Joe Buck
22:49 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
22:48 gcc-4.2-20070117 is now available gccadmin
22:45 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Richard Guenther
22:35 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
19:54 Preventing warnings (correction) Richard Stallman
19:48 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
19:46 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Joe Buck
19:42 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
19:38 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Michael Veksler
19:32 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Paubert
19:25 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Michael Veksler
19:22 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
19:20 Re: char alignment on ARM Michael Eager
19:18 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Ian Lance Taylor
19:14 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Joe Buck
19:13 RE: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Dave Korn
19:12 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Joe Buck
19:09 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Joe Buck
19:03 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
18:57 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
18:36 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Michael Veksler
18:23 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
18:10 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
18:04 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
18:03 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
17:56 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions David Daney
17:52 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
17:51 Re: char alignment on ARM Mike Stump
17:48 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
17:41 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. Ramana Radhakrishnan
16:24 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. Mircea Namolaru
16:01 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. Richard Kenner
15:39 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Paubert
15:35 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. Mircea Namolaru
15:32 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. Mircea Namolaru
13:23 char alignment on ARM Inder
11:28 Re: Creating a variable declaration of custom type. Revital1 Eres
09:28 Re: cross mode -fstack-protector ? Jakub Jelinek
09:22 Dataflow branch successfully bootstrapped on s390 and s390x Andreas Krebbel
09:16 cross mode -fstack-protector ? Balint Cristian
08:25 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
07:29 Re: Char array alignment for PowerPc changed Andrew Pinski
07:09 Re: Char array alignment for PowerPc changed Michael Eager
06:04 Re: Preventing warnings Ian Lance Taylor
04:56 Re: Char array alignment for PowerPc changed Andrew Pinski
04:47 Re: Preventing warnings Brooks Moses
04:04 Char array alignment for PowerPc changed Michael Eager
03:36 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html points to non-existing source http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-SVN/ Ben Elliston
02:49 http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html points to non-existing source http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-SVN/ Tomas Bily
02:18 Preventing warnings Richard Stallman
00:35 Re: meaning of typedef ...and something more Ian Lance Taylor
00:12 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Joe Buck
00:09 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis

January 16, 2007
23:55 Re: meaning of typedef ...and something more Joe Buck
23:55 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Pinski
23:52 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
23:46 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Vincent Lefevre
23:43 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Vincent Lefevre
23:43 meaning of typedef ...and something more Laura Tardivo
23:38 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Vincent Lefevre
23:08 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Ian Lance Taylor
22:24 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
21:42 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Joe Buck
21:41 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Ian Lance Taylor
21:31 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions David Daney
21:29 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Vincent Lefevre
21:28 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
21:23 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Ian Lance Taylor
21:08 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions David Daney
21:04 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Vincent Lefevre
20:43 Re: relevant files for target backends Markus Franke
20:34 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
19:27 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Joe Buck
19:12 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
19:05 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions David Daney
19:04 Re: relevant files for target backends Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
19:01 Reduce size of indirect-dispatch executables Andrew Haley
19:00 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
18:57 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Roberto Bagnara
18:50 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
18:48 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Joe Buck
18:46 RE: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Dave Korn
18:44 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
18:41 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
18:40 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Roberto Bagnara
18:33 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Thorsten Glaser
18:33 RE: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Dave Korn
18:28 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
18:23 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
18:11 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Roberto Bagnara
18:06 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions David Daney
18:05 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
18:05 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
17:59 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Roberto Bagnara
17:53 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Joe Buck
17:40 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
17:39 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
17:35 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions David Daney
17:31 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
17:30 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
17:15 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Robert Dewar
16:16 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Manuel López-Ibáñez
16:15 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
16:09 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Roberto Bagnara
16:06 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Duncan Sands
16:05 Re: 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix Grigory Zagorodnev
15:50 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
15:46 Re: Creating a variable declaration of custom type. Ferad Zyulkyarov
15:39 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Roberto Bagnara
15:32 Re: GCC trunk failed to compile cpu2k6/dealII at x86_64 Grigory Zagorodnev
15:19 GCC trunk failed to compile cpu2k6/dealII at x86_64 Grigory Zagorodnev
15:10 Re: relevant files for target backends Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:01 Re: relevant files for target backends pranav bhandarkar
15:00 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
14:30 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
14:22 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
14:00 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
13:22 Re: relevant files for target backends Markus Franke
12:53 Re: Cheatsheet for building gcc Paolo Bonzini
12:44 Re: Cheatsheet for building gcc Paolo Bonzini
12:40 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Paolo Bonzini
12:38 Re: Cheatsheet for building gcc Paolo Bonzini
12:38 Re: Cheatsheet for building gcc Richard Kenner
12:32 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Lucas (a.k.a T-Bird or bsdfan3
12:25 Re: Creating a variable declaration of custom type. Ferad Zyulkyarov
12:25 Re: Cheatsheet for building gcc Zdenek Dvorak
12:19 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Paolo Bonzini
12:18 Re: Cheatsheet for building gcc Paolo Bonzini
11:47 Re: relevant files for target backends pranav bhandarkar
10:25 relevant files for target backends Markus Franke
10:01 Re: Cheatsheet for building gcc Zdenek Dvorak
09:30 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Gabriel Dos Reis
09:23 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Manuel López-Ibáñez
08:44 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Michael Veksler
07:54 Re: Cheatsheet for building gcc Paolo Bonzini
06:12 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. pranav bhandarkar
04:54 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Paubert
04:53 Re: Do we need assemble_external_libcall? H. J. Lu
04:33 Re: Do we need assemble_external_libcall? H. J. Lu
04:23 Re: Do we need assemble_external_libcall? Ian Lance Taylor
04:01 Re: Do we need assemble_external_libcall? H. J. Lu
03:35 Re: Do we need assemble_external_libcall? Ian Lance Taylor
03:16 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Ian Lance Taylor
01:01 Cheatsheet for building gcc Zdenek Dvorak

January 15, 2007
23:24 Re: 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix H. J. Lu
22:43 gcc-4.1-20070115 is now available gccadmin
22:21 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Paolo Carlini
21:56 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Gabriel Dos Reis
21:40 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Paolo Carlini
21:35 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
21:31 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
20:49 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Ian Lance Taylor
20:47 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix Toon Moene
20:34 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Michael Veksler
20:30 Re: Creating a variable declaration of custom type. Jim Wilson
20:14 Re: Performance of gcc 4.1 vs gcc 3.4 Jim Wilson
19:30 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
19:15 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Joe Buck
19:14 new DATAFLOW PORTING wiki available. Kenneth Zadeck
18:47 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
18:45 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
18:32 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
18:04 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:55 Re: java building Tom Tromey
17:50 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
17:46 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:37 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:31 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
17:30 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:14 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Martin Sebor
17:11 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
17:06 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Gabriel Dos Reis
16:49 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
16:24 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:22 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
16:17 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gabriel Dos Reis
15:59 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Gabriel Dos Reis
15:55 Do we need assemble_external_libcall? H. J. Lu
15:52 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Paolo Carlini
15:50 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
15:37 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Paolo Carlini
15:25 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Roberto Bagnara
15:25 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Gabriel Dos Reis
15:24 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Roberto Bagnara
15:17 RE: Performance of gcc 4.1 vs gcc 3.4 Dave Korn
15:01 Performance of gcc 4.1 vs gcc 3.4 ying lcs
14:59 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix Grigory Zagorodnev
14:13 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Paolo Carlini
14:13 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Roberto Bagnara
14:08 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
14:07 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Andrew Haley
14:03 Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions Paolo Carlini
13:54 Miscompilation of remainder expressions Roberto Bagnara
13:36 Re: CSE not combining equivalent expressions. Richard Guenther
13:19 Re: Creating a variable declaration of custom type. Ferad Zyulkyarov
12:55 CSE not combining equivalent expressions. pranav bhandarkar
12:35 Re: Creating a variable declaration of custom type. Revital1 Eres
12:06 Creating a variable declaration of custom type. Ferad Zyulkyarov
11:13 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
10:47 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Manuel López-Ibáñez
10:35 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Paolo Carlini
09:15 Hei sir, your one-eyed monster is really small Henneberg Krzysztof
02:19 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Roger Sayle
01:44 Re: Jan Hubicka and Uros Bizjak appointed i386 maintainers Gerald Pfeifer
01:17 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Martin Sebor
00:24 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini

January 14, 2007
23:48 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gerald Pfeifer
23:25 Re: RFC: Extending --help Gerald Pfeifer
23:18 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
23:13 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Manuel López-Ibáñez
23:05 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
22:56 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Paolo Carlini
22:51 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Manuel López-Ibáñez
22:49 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Manuel López-Ibáñez
22:45 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Manuel López-Ibáñez
22:41 gcc-4.0-20070114 is now available gccadmin
22:34 Re: fat binaries for FSF gcc on Darwin? Mike Stump
21:44 Re: compile time enforcement of exception specification Howard Hinnant
21:38 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Paolo Carlini
21:18 Re: -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
21:08 -Wconversion versus libstdc++ Gerald Pfeifer
21:05 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Paolo Carlini
20:23 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:57 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Paolo Carlini
19:52 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:30 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Paolo Carlini
19:11 Re: compile time enforcement of exception specification Robert Dewar
19:10 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Manuel López-Ibáñez
18:41 Re: compile time enforcement of exception specification James Dennett
17:56 Re: Unsure about a new warning in mainline Paolo Carlini
14:28 Unsure about a new warning in mainline Paolo Carlini
10:42 Re: Running GCC tests on installed compiler Dominique Dhumieres
05:26 Re: compile time enforcement of exception specification Bob Rossi
05:15 Re: compile time enforcement of exception specification Andrew Pinski
05:12 compile time enforcement of exception specification Bob Rossi

January 13, 2007
23:01 Re: fat binaries for FSF gcc on Darwin? Eric Christopher
22:50 Re: Enforcing order of execution for function arguments Segher Boessenkool
19:30 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Gerald Pfeifer
16:28 Re: fat binaries for FSF gcc on Darwin? Jack Howarth
16:02 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
15:58 Re: RFC: Walways-true considered harmful Manuel López-Ibáñez
15:01 Re: debugging capabilities on AIX ? Eric Botcazou
15:01 Re: fat binaries for FSF gcc on Darwin? Eric Christopher
14:13 fat binaries for FSF gcc on Darwin? Jack Howarth
14:10 Re: Invariant division Paolo Bonzini
14:01 RE: RFC: Walways-true considered harmful Dave Korn
13:59 RE: RFC: Walways-true considered harmful Dave Korn
12:55 Re: RFC: Walways-true considered harmful Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
12:38 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
08:39 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Brooks Moses
05:46 Re: Running GCC tests on installed compiler Joe Buck
05:02 Re: Invariant division Ian Lance Taylor
04:54 Re: RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Manuel López-Ibáñez
04:08 RFC: Walways-true considered harmful Manuel López-Ibáñez
03:59 Re: debugging capabilities on AIX ? Joel Brobecker
02:17 Re: Running GCC tests on installed compiler Daniel Jacobowitz
02:11 Invariant division drizzle drizzle
02:08 Re: Running GCC tests on installed compiler Mike Stump

January 12, 2007
23:56 Running GCC tests on installed compiler Steve Ellcey
23:25 Re: GCC trunk revision 120704 failed to build spec cpu2k/gcc Jan Hubicka
22:56 RE: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Meissner, Michael
22:46 gcc-4.3-20070112 is now available gccadmin
22:36 RE: RFC: Add BID as a configure time option for DFP Meissner, Michael
20:06 Re: GCC trunk revision 120704 failed to build spec cpu2k/gcc Zdenek Dvorak
19:27 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 H. J. Lu
19:26 Re: bug management: WAITING bugs that have timed out Mike Stump
19:24 Re: GCC trunk revision 120704 failed to build spec cpu2k/gcc Zdenek Dvorak
19:12 Re: debugging capabilities on AIX ? Mike Stump
19:09 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Mike Stump
19:07 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 Daniel Berlin
18:52 Re: PATCH: Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions H. J. Lu
18:40 Re: GCC trunk revision 120704 failed to build spec cpu2k/gcc H. J. Lu
18:31 GCC trunk revision 120704 failed to build spec cpu2k/gcc Grigory Zagorodnev
17:35 Re: bug management: WAITING bugs that have timed out Joe Buck
17:32 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 H. J. Lu
15:11 Re: error when porting from g++ for hp-ux to g++ for linux Ian Lance Taylor
14:50 Re: debugging capabilities on AIX ? David Edelsohn
14:40 Re: PATCH: Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions H. J. Lu
14:39 Re: PATCH: Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions H. J. Lu
12:46 error when porting from g++ for hp-ux to g++ for linux Puetz, Oliver P11M22
12:38 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Andrew Haley
12:35 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Nathan Sidwell
12:13 Re: PATCH: Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions Andrew Haley
11:38 Re: bug management: WAITING bugs that have timed out Eric Botcazou
10:41 Re: bug management: WAITING bugs that have timed out Andreas Schwab
09:57 RFC: Extending --help Nick Clifton
09:33 Re: dump after RTL expand Steven Bosscher
09:27 RE: dump after RTL expand Andrija Radicevic
08:56 debugging capabilities on AIX ? Olivier Hainque
07:57 Re: PATCH: Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions Paolo Bonzini
07:22 Re: bug management: WAITING bugs that have timed out Peter Barada
06:58 Re: Making gcc read from the standard input James Dennett
06:47 bug management: WAITING bugs that have timed out Joe Buck
05:27 -fprefetch-loop-arrays comportement. taha karim
04:36 Re: libgcc-math Gabriel Dos Reis
04:31 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Gabriel Dos Reis
01:29 Re: RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Ian Lance Taylor
01:10 Re: RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
01:08 Re: RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Mike Stump
01:06 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 Daniel Berlin

January 11, 2007
23:49 Re: RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Ian Lance Taylor
23:34 Re: dump after RTL expand Paul Brook
20:41 libgcc-math Mark Mitchell
20:30 Re: gcc on 64 bits machine Joe Buck
20:10 gcc on 64 bits machine ying lcs
20:09 Re: PATCH: Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions H. J. Lu
19:35 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Peter Barada
19:27 Re: dump after RTL expand Steven Bosscher
19:21 dump after RTL expand Andrija Radicevic
19:04 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
18:55 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Silvius Rus
18:33 Re: PATCH: Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions Paolo Bonzini
18:30 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Sergei Organov
18:30 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Sergei Organov
18:27 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Andrew Pinski
18:25 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Sergei Organov
18:15 Re: PATCH: Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions H. J. Lu
18:06 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Silvius Rus
18:03 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Andrew Haley
18:01 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Andrew Haley
17:59 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Sergei Organov
17:31 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Sergei Organov
17:17 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Mike Stump
17:03 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Andrew Haley
16:40 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Sergei Organov
15:28 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 Grigory Zagorodnev
14:38 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Andrew Haley
14:31 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Sergei Organov
14:18 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Andrew Haley
14:02 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Sergei Organov
13:45 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Andrew Haley
13:16 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Sergei Organov
12:48 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Andrew Haley
10:14 Re: Fwd: Re: gcc 4.1.1 for mcore Nick Clifton
09:12 Re: Making gcc read from the standard input Paolo Bonzini
08:04 Re: PATCH: Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions Paolo Bonzini
08:03 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Richard Sandiford
07:05 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Joe Buck
06:31 Making gcc read from the standard input Tathagato Rai Dastidar
03:13 Re: why Winit-self (was Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi) Gabriel Dos Reis
03:09 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Gabriel Dos Reis
02:01 Re: main(), registers and gdb Daniel Jacobowitz
01:56 RFC: Wextra digest (fixing PR7651) Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
01:54 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Joe Buck
01:42 why Winit-self (was Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi) Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
01:09 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Gabriel Dos Reis
00:38 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Bernd Schmidt
00:15 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Joe Buck
00:05 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Tom Tromey

January 10, 2007
23:51 Re: main(), registers and gdb Greg Watson
23:39 Re: main(), registers and gdb Daniel Jacobowitz
23:37 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
23:33 main(), registers and gdb Greg Watson
23:05 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Eric Botcazou
22:46 gcc-4.2-20070110 is now available gccadmin
22:39 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Andrew MacLeod
22:35 Re: RFC: Add BID as a configure time option for DFP H. J. Lu
22:17 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Andreas Schwab
22:11 Re: RFC: Add BID as a configure time option for DFP Janis Johnson
22:10 Re: java building Tom Tromey
22:01 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Mike Stump
21:57 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
21:56 Re: Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Jan Hubicka
21:50 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Chris Pickett
21:29 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Chris Pickett
21:14 Mis-handled ColdFire submission? Richard Sandiford
20:21 java building Mike Stump
20:19 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
20:12 Re: RFC: Add BID as a configure time option for DFP Joe Buck
19:40 RFC: Add BID as a configure time option for DFP H. J. Lu
19:03 PATCH: Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions H. J. Lu
18:34 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Gabriel Dos Reis
18:32 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Chris Pickett
18:15 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Chris Pickett
17:53 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Gabriel Dos Reis
17:49 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Gabriel Dos Reis
16:15 Re: Aliasing error in man page? Ian Lance Taylor
16:09 Re: Enforcing order of execution for function arguments Roberto COSTA
15:57 Re: Enforcing order of execution for function arguments Andrew Haley
15:55 Aliasing error in man page? Andrew Haley
15:50 Re: Enforcing order of execution for function arguments Roberto COSTA
15:49 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Daniel Berlin
15:35 Re: Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions Tom Tromey
15:33 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Tom Tromey
15:28 Re: Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions H. J. Lu
15:24 Re: Enforcing order of execution for function arguments Ian Lance Taylor
15:20 Re: Enforcing order of execution for function arguments Andrew Haley
15:19 Re: Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions Ian Lance Taylor
15:13 Re: Tricky(?) aliasing question. Ian Lance Taylor
15:08 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Chris Pickett
15:05 Enforcing order of execution for function arguments Chris Jefferson
14:29 Build shared libraries with -Bsymbolic-functions H. J. Lu
14:15 Re: gcc trunk 20070110 build failure (--enable-targets=all i486-linux-gnu) Daniel Jacobowitz
12:40 Tricky(?) aliasing question. Sergei Organov
11:07 gcc trunk 20070110 build failure (--enable-targets=all i486-linux-gnu) Matthias Klose
10:47 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
10:18 Re: gcc problem for help Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
09:25 gcc problem for help 王 刚伟
04:47 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Gabriel Dos Reis

January 09, 2007
23:19 Re: RFC: Mark a section to be discarded for DSO and executable Rod Evans
22:59 Re: RFC: Mark a section to be discarded for DSO and executable Rod Evans
22:57 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data H. J. Lu
22:27 Re: Is delete (nothrow) supported? H. J. Lu
22:21 RE: RFC: Mark a section to be discarded for DSO and executable Lu, Hongjiu
22:16 Re: RFC: Mark a section to be discarded for DSO and executable Rod Evans
21:55 Is delete (nothrow) supported? H. J. Lu
19:21 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data H. J. Lu
18:31 Re: RFC: Mark a section to be discarded for DSO and executable H. J. Lu
18:19 Re: RFC: Mark a section to be discarded for DSO and executable Seongbae Park
18:10 Re: RFC: Mark a section to be discarded for DSO and executable Ian Lance Taylor
17:52 RFC: Mark a section to be discarded for DSO and executable H. J. Lu
17:42 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data H. J. Lu
17:33 Re: Fwd: Re: gcc 4.1.1 for mcore Nick Clifton
15:52 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data H. J. Lu
15:42 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data Paolo Bonzini
14:50 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data H. J. Lu
14:18 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data H. J. Lu
14:02 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data Andrew Haley
14:00 Re: About STACK ALIGNMENT Ian Lance Taylor
13:56 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data H. J. Lu
13:51 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data Andrew Haley
13:41 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data H. J. Lu
13:38 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data Andrew Haley
09:47 About STACK ALIGNMENT Rohit Arul Raj
09:34 Re: Jan Hubicka and Uros Bizjak appointed i386 maintainers Uros Bizjak
04:23 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data H. J. Lu
04:10 Re: RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data Andrew Pinski
02:51 Re: Build problem with gcc 4.3.0 20070108 (experimental) George R Goffe
02:26 RFC: Speeding up libstdc++.so with --dynamic-list-data H. J. Lu

January 08, 2007
23:38 Re: Build problem with gcc 4.3.0 20070108 (experimental) George R Goffe
22:45 gcc-4.1-20070108 is now available gccadmin
22:14 Re: Jan Hubicka and Uros Bizjak appointed i386 maintainers Jan Hubicka
22:05 Re: Build problem with gcc 4.3.0 20070108 (experimental) Jan Hubicka
21:55 Re: Build problem with gcc 4.3.0 20070108 (experimental) Andrew Pinski
21:53 Re: Build problem with gcc 4.3.0 20070108 (experimental) Jan Hubicka
21:45 Re: Fwd: Re: gcc 4.1.1 for mcore Jim Wilson
20:54 Re: Fwd: Re: gcc 4.1.1 for mcore Alexander Grobman
20:15 Re: Build problem with gcc 4.3.0 20070108 (experimental) Richard Guenther
20:11 Build problem with gcc 4.3.0 20070108 (experimental) George R Goffe
17:19 Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Bruno Haible
16:25 Jan Hubicka and Uros Bizjak appointed i386 maintainers David Edelsohn
14:53 Test: Immobilien Hamburg Jan Eissfeld
14:31 Re: C++ overflow testcases failing on mainline Paolo Bonzini
13:49 C++ overflow testcases failing on mainline Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
08:01 Re: SSE (Pentium 3) - Is this correct? Dorit Nuzman
07:15 Re: SSE (Pentium 3) - Is this correct? Ian Lance Taylor
07:15 Re: SSE (Pentium 3) - Is this correct? mal content
07:00 Re: SSE (Pentium 3) - Is this correct? Revital1 Eres
06:43 SSE (Pentium 3) - Is this correct? mal content
04:46 Re: passing arguments in emit_libraray_call 吴曦
04:26 Re: passing arguments in emit_libraray_call Ian Lance Taylor
02:40 passing arguments in emit_libraray_call 吴曦

January 07, 2007
22:42 gcc-4.0-20070107 is now available gccadmin
13:41 Re: Top level libgcc checked in Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
03:44 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Chris Pickett
00:26 Clarify policy on documentation changes [wwwdocs] Gerald Pfeifer

January 06, 2007
18:24 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back? Paolo Bonzini
16:19 Re: We have no active maintainer for the i386 port Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:54 Re: We have no active maintainer for the i386 port H. J. Lu
15:40 We have no active maintainer for the i386 port Steven Bosscher
00:04 Re: proposal to clean up @node Warning Options in invoke.texi Gerald Pfeifer

January 05, 2007
23:56 Re: Merging the gcj-eclipse branch Tom Tromey
22:45 gcc-4.3-20070105 is now available gccadmin
22:25 Re: gcc 3.4 > mainline performance regression Daniel Berlin
22:18 Re: __sync_bool_compare_and_swap Magnus Fromreide
20:53 Re: __sync_bool_compare_and_swap H. J. Lu
20:28 Re: Closing the GCC 4.0 branch (was: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:27 Re: __sync_bool_compare_and_swap Magnus Fromreide
20:16 Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule Andrew Pinski
20:14 Re: Closing the GCC 4.0 branch (was: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule) Joe Buck
20:14 Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule Gabriel Dos Reis
20:01 Re: Closing the GCC 4.0 branch (was: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule) Andrew Pinski
19:53 Closing the GCC 4.0 branch (was: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule) Gerald Pfeifer
19:52 Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule Joe Buck
19:33 Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule Richard Guenther
19:24 Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule David Fang
19:11 Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule Eric Botcazou
18:41 Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule Richard Guenther
18:32 Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule Joe Buck
18:27 Re: Re : gcc 3.4 > mainline performance regression Andrew Haley
18:22 Re : gcc 3.4 > mainline performance regression Mick CORNUT
17:21 Re: __sync_bool_compare_and_swap Daniel Jacobowitz
17:05 Re: __sync_bool_compare_and_swap Andrew Haley
17:00 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back? Daniel Jacobowitz
16:58 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back? Eric Botcazou
16:57 __sync_bool_compare_and_swap Magnus Fromreide
16:56 Re: gcc 3.4 > mainline performance regression Steven Bosscher
16:46 Re: gcc 3.4 > mainline performance regression Andrew Haley
16:46 Re: gcc 3.4 > mainline performance regression David Edelsohn
16:35 Re: gcc 3.4 > mainline performance regression Steven Bosscher
16:33 Re: gcc 3.4 > mainline performance regression Steven Bosscher
16:33 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back? Diego Novillo
15:27 Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule Ian Lance Taylor
15:19 Re: gcc 3.4 > mainline performance regression Ian Lance Taylor
15:04 Re: Scheduling Duncan Sands
14:19 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back? Daniel Jacobowitz
14:18 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back? Richard Kenner
14:02 gcc 3.4 > mainline performance regression Andrew Haley
13:56 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back? Daniel Jacobowitz
13:50 Re: Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule David Edelsohn
13:18 Re: RFC: Implementation of ELF sharable sections H. J. Lu
08:53 Re: RFC: Implementation of ELF sharable sections Christoph Hellwig
08:38 Build snapshots according to a more regular schedule Gerald Pfeifer
07:59 Re: Suspicious expand_complex_division() in tree-comlpex.c Andrew Pinski
07:52 Re: Suspicious expand_complex_division() in tree-comlpex.c Marcin Dalecki
07:35 Re: Suspicious expand_complex_division() in tree-comlpex.c Andrew Pinski
07:27 Suspicious expand_complex_division() in tree-comlpex.c Marcin Dalecki
07:17 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back? Eric Botcazou
07:02 Re: trunk gcc has problems finding crtbegin.o Philippe Schaffnit
05:41 GCC 4.1.2 Status Report [2007-01-04] Mark Mitchell
05:05 Re: How to dedicate a register for special purpose in gcc? Ian Lance Taylor
05:00 Re: getting better info out of Bugzilla Andrew Pinski
04:57 Re: How to dedicate a register for special purpose in gcc? Daniel Jacobowitz
04:53 How to dedicate a register for special purpose in gcc? 吴曦
04:27 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back? Daniel Jacobowitz
01:26 getting better info out of Bugzilla Joe Buck

January 04, 2007
23:32 RFC: Implementation of ELF sharable sections H. J. Lu
23:16 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back? Eric Botcazou
23:15 Re: Retiring IPA-branch Gerald Pfeifer
23:12 PATCH for Re: 3 new GCC mirrors Gerald Pfeifer
22:42 gcc-4.0-20070104 is now available gccadmin
22:18 Re: Fwd: Bugzilla internal error Daniel Berlin
22:04 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Gerald Pfeifer
20:59 Re: libgcc Daniel Jacobowitz
20:49 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Matt Fago
20:44 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Richard Guenther
20:41 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core drizzle drizzle
20:27 Re: Fwd: Bugzilla internal error Paolo Carlini
20:22 Fwd: Bugzilla internal error Daniel Berlin
20:17 libgcc Mike Stump
20:06 Re: mixing VEC-tors of string & GTY? Mike Stump
20:04 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Matt Fago
19:47 Re: A simple program with a large array segfaults Mike Stump
19:39 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Richard Guenther
19:34 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core drizzle drizzle
19:33 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Vincent Lefevre
18:42 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Joe Buck
18:25 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Vincent Lefevre
18:25 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Matt Fago
18:09 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Vincent Lefevre
17:54 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core drizzle drizzle
17:38 Scheduling us tx
16:49 Re: A simple program with a large array segfaults Gowri Kumar CH
16:25 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Vincent Lefevre
16:11 Re: A simple program with a large array segfaults J.C.
15:19 Re: trunk gcc has problems finding crtbegin.o Martin Reinecke
14:23 Re: trunk gcc has problems finding crtbegin.o Daniel Jacobowitz
14:00 Re: trunk gcc has problems finding crtbegin.o Daniel Jacobowitz
13:57 Re: Top level libgcc checked in Daniel Jacobowitz
13:32 trunk gcc has problems finding crtbegin.o Martin Reinecke
13:22 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
12:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Sandiford
12:38 Re: mixing VEC-tors of string & GTY? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:19 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
12:18 Re: A simple program with a large array segfaults Andrew Pinski
12:14 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Vincent Lefevre
12:11 A simple program with a large array segfaults Gowri Kumar CH
11:34 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Sandiford
10:38 Re: mixing VEC-tors of string & GTY? Andrew Pinski
10:35 Re: mixing VEC-tors of string & GTY? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
10:29 Re: mixing VEC-tors of string & GTY? Andrew Pinski
10:26 mixing VEC-tors of string & GTY? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
07:43 Re: Top level libgcc checked in Paolo Bonzini
06:12 Re: Top level libgcc checked in Andrew Pinski
06:07 Re: Top level libgcc checked in Ben Elliston
05:37 Re: Top level libgcc checked in Mark Mitchell
05:19 Re: Top level libgcc checked in Ben Elliston
04:28 Top level libgcc checked in Daniel Jacobowitz
03:19 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core drizzle drizzle
03:10 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Matt Fago
02:28 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core drizzle drizzle
01:29 Re: mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core Joe Buck
01:11 mpfr issues when Installing gcc 3.4 on fedora core drizzle drizzle
00:12 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo? Jeffrey Law

January 03, 2007
23:15 Re: running bprob.exp tests in a cross-testing environment Ben Elliston
22:12 Re: Merging the gcj-eclipse branch Andrew Pinski
22:01 Merging the gcj-eclipse branch Tom Tromey
21:47 RE: gcc, mplayer and profile (mcount) Adam Sulmicki
20:45 The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.9 is released H. J. Lu
20:39 Re: gcc, mplayer and profile (mcount) Joe Buck
20:24 RE: gcc, mplayer and profile (mcount) Dave Korn
20:03 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
19:08 Re: gcc, mplayer and profile (mcount) Adam Sulmicki
18:49 Re: gcc, mplayer and profile (mcount) Ian Lance Taylor
18:33 Re: gcc, mplayer and profile (mcount) Andrew Haley
18:32 Re: gcc, mplayer and profile (mcount) Ian Lance Taylor
18:27 Re: gcc, mplayer and profile (mcount) H. J. Lu
18:18 Re: gcc, mplayer and profile (mcount) Seongbae Park
18:08 Re: gcc, mplayer and profile (mcount) Ian Lance Taylor
17:54 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Laurent GUERBY
14:30 Succesfsull install Claudio J. Mendoza
14:17 gcc, mplayer and profile (mcount) Adam Sulmicki
11:04 Re: identifing free() in tree-ssa Bernhard R. Link
10:08 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Laurent GUERBY
10:07 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Andrew Haley
09:32 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Gabriel Dos Reis
09:30 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Gabriel Dos Reis
08:20 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Paul Eggert
07:36 Re: [autovect] autovect-branch reopened from latest trunk Dorit Nuzman
07:34 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Andrew Pinski
07:30 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Russell Shaw
07:25 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Andrew Pinski
07:21 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Paul Eggert
07:06 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Paul Eggert
06:45 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Paul Eggert
05:08 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Andrew Pinski
04:58 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Russell Shaw
03:04 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Robert Dewar
02:24 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Richard Kenner
00:50 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Paul Eggert
00:00 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Andrew Pinski

January 02, 2007
23:56 Re: Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Richard Kenner
23:44 Re: running bprob.exp tests in a cross-testing environment Adam Nemet
23:41 Autoconf manual's coverage of signed integer overflow & portability Paul Eggert
23:33 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
23:25 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
23:25 [autovect] autovect-branch reopened from latest trunk Victor Kaplansky
22:17 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Diego Novillo
21:57 Retiring IPA-branch Jan Hubicka
21:49 Re: identifing free() in tree-ssa Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:21 Re: -pg problem Adam Sulmicki
21:16 Re: -pg problem Adam Sulmicki
20:23 Re: -pg problem Ian Lance Taylor
20:17 -pg problem Adam Sulmicki
19:59 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Geert Bosch
19:20 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Mark Mitchell
17:54 gcc-4.2-20070102 is now available gccadmin
17:50 [ecj] Fix ArrayStore testsuite failure Andrew Haley
17:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Schlie
16:02 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
15:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Schlie
15:38 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
15:37 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
15:30 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
15:26 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
15:05 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
15:01 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
14:07 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
14:06 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
14:00 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
13:58 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
13:35 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Vladimir Yanovsky
13:31 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
13:26 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
12:39 Dear Benefactor Of 2006 Masory Grant............. Sean Williams
12:38 Dear Benefactor Of 2006 Masory Grant............. Sean Williams
11:44 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
10:22 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
10:19 Re: gfortran year end status report Paul Thomas
10:04 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
09:42 Re: gfortran year end status report FX Coudert
08:47 Re: [mem-ssa] Updated documentation Ira Rosen
08:07 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gerald Pfeifer
05:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
05:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Joe Buck
03:41 Re: Link tests not allowed Daniel Jacobowitz
03:33 Re: Link tests not allowed Jim Wilson
03:22 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
03:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Andrew Pinski
03:17 Re: Link tests not allowed Daniel Jacobowitz
03:16 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
03:15 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
02:58 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Ian Lance Taylor
02:19 Re: Link tests not allowed Douglas B Rupp
02:19 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
02:16 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Ian Lance Taylor
02:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
01:51 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Mark Mitchell
01:46 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
01:35 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Mark Mitchell
01:14 Re: Link tests not allowed Jim Wilson
01:00 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Daniel Berlin
00:41 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Ian Lance Taylor
00:39 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Ian Lance Taylor
00:31 gfortran year end status report Steve Kargl
00:02 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert

January 01, 2007
23:24 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
22:48 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
22:46 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
22:24 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Richard Kenner
22:22 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Bruce Korb
21:56 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Jan Hubicka
21:35 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Bruce Korb
21:07 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? Gerald Pfeifer
20:53 Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix. Gerald Pfeifer
19:43 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Joe Buck
19:33 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Joe Buck
18:57 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
18:44 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
18:24 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Andrew Pinski
18:18 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
18:00 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
18:00 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Vladimir Yanovsky
17:48 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
17:36 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Schlie
17:25 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
17:23 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Geert Bosch
17:16 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Joseph S. Myers
16:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Ian Lance Taylor
16:43 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Geert Bosch
16:19 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs Jan Hubicka
16:07 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Ian Lance Taylor
13:53 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Robert Dewar
12:42 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
12:28 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
11:04 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Guenther
09:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
09:35 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Gabriel Dos Reis
06:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
05:38 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Ian Lance Taylor
05:34 Re: Link tests not allowed Jim Wilson
05:25 Re: Link tests not allowed Jim Wilson
05:18 Re: Link tests not allowed Jim Wilson
04:53 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Bruce Korb
04:10 Re: Link tests not allowed Douglas B Rupp
03:45 Re: Link tests not allowed Andrew Pinski
03:31 Re: Link tests not allowed Douglas B Rupp
03:10 Re: Link tests not allowed Daniel Jacobowitz
02:54 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
02:50 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Ian Lance Taylor
02:42 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
02:40 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Ian Lance Taylor
02:13 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Ian Lance Taylor
02:12 Re: Link tests not allowed Jim Wilson
01:57 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
01:54 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
01:54 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Seongbae Park
01:53 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Richard Kenner
01:35 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Ian Lance Taylor
01:32 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
01:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Paul Eggert
01:04 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Vincent Lefevre
00:17 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Daniel Berlin
00:13 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..." Daniel Berlin


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3