This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: dewar at adacore dot com
Cc: espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net, pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu, richard dot guenther at gmail dot com, seongbae dot park at gmail dot com
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:50:23 EST
Subject: Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
References: <200612300147.kBU1lODl026375@localhost.localdomain> <m31wmi3z1g.fsf@zeus.integrable-solutions.net> <ab3a61990612291959i2683ef9bn8daaccf227f3e52f@mail.gmail.com> <10612300531.AA08985@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <4595FB40.7090100@adacore.com>

> If not, this is seriously confused, lia-1 is MUCH more than just
> wrapping integer types.

Then indeed there is confusion here.  It was sounding to me like GCC
would already had support for lia-1, but just needed to define signed
overflows.  If GCC does not and will not support lia-1, why are we
talking about it?

References:
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
  - From: Seongbae Park
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]