This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Denis Vlasenko <vda dot linux at googlemail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, bug-gnulib at gnu dot org
Date: 21 Dec 2006 03:49:31 +0100
Subject: Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
References: <20061218230847.GD3824@iam.uni-bonn.de> <200612191948.36039.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <17800.14335.643248.648942@zebedee.pink> <200612192225.41991.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <17801.8613.861825.604009@zebedee.pink>

Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

[...]

| C is no longer a kind of high-level assembly laguage:
| it's defined by a standard, in terms of an abstract machine, and some
| operations are not well-defined. 

that does not mean C is not a kind of high-level assembly language.
:-/

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
  - From: Dave Korn

References:
- Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
  - From: Denis Vlasenko
- Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
  - From: Denis Vlasenko
- Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]