This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, Eric Weddington <eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com>, Danny Smith <dannysmith at clear dot net dot nz>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:05:35 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
- References: <20061013165108.GG6357@lios> <1165909998.24607.7.camel@celery.andrew.com>
Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 12:51 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> A relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
>> Comments?
>> OK for Stage1?
>
> I do have another issue with these set of patches which I did not notice
> until today.
> I can no longer do inside a just built GCC do:
> ./cc1 t.c
> or
> ./xgcc -B. t.c
> If I used the same prefix of an already installed GCC.
> This makes debugging driver issues without installing the driver again.
What are the contents of t.c? What if you set GCC_EXEC_PREFIX?
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713