This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: Vincent Lefevre <vincent at vinc17 dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gerald at pfeifer dot com
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 18:53:12 -0800
Subject: Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
References: <20061129110210.GA24271@prunille.vinc17.org> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0612021152510.4112@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <20061204174841.GL21441@synopsys.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0612042111130.4554@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>

On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 09:32:19PM -0500, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> OTOH, Joe you're arguing we should never require people to upgrade.  Well
> I think that's unfair to people who rely on gcc to produce correct code.

So, should we detect old binutils versions and refuse to build as well?
How about old C library versions?

I suggest warning that there will be bugs, and proceeding.

References:
- Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]