This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety

From: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro at ftp dot linux dot org dot uk>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:33:33 -0800
Subject: Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
References: <20061201172149.GC3078@ftp.linux.org.uk> <1165031871.30345.5.camel@celery.andrew.com>

Andrew Pinski wrote:

On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 17:21 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
There's a bunch of related issues, some kernel, some gcc, thus the Cc from hell on that one.
I don't really see how this is a GCC question, rather I see this
as a C question which means this should have gone to either
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org or the C news group.

.
.
.

PS don't cross post and I still don't see a GCC development question in
here, only a C one.

Andrew,

There are times when we should cut people a little slack. If not for the sake of general harmony, then at least to facilitate the improvement of two important programs (the Linux kernel and GCC).

There is a lot more that could be said, but I will leave it at that,
David Daney

References:
- [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
  - From: Al Viro
- Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]