This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: mainline slowdown
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 15:06 -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On 12/1/06, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 13:49 -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Using quick (in theory) and trusty cpgram.ii, I get:
> > > >
> > > > tree PTA :1135.48 (88%) usr 5.47 (55%) sys1168.23 (85%) wall 4045 kB ( 1%) ggc
> > > > TOTAL :1283.62 9.97 1381.98 451745 kB
> > >
> > > This is uh, like 20 minutes wall time.
> > > So where is 10 hours coming from?
> >
> > this says cpgram.ii, not bootstrap/make check cycle. Big difference.
>
> BTW, what do you think these have to do with each other?
>
nothing except thats its C++ code and I had it handy. I thought You had
fixed this and was making sure that if you had you were aware there was
a regression. Hence I asked: "Is this new code, or is this the old issue
we had a few weeks ago? I lost track."
>
> *particularly* when the other issue you keep harping on has in fact,
> been shown *not* to increase GCC compile time by the regression
> testers.
what other issue have I harped on? One note asking about mainline
bootstrap/make check that seemed excessively long? I don't recall ever
"harping on" about anything else except possibly discussing this cpgram
issue a few weeks ago.
Andrew