gcc archive
author index for December, 2006

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

Benoît Jacob

• 2006-12-13 13:05 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll
• 2006-12-14 07:54 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll
• 2006-12-14 08:07 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll

Benoît Jacob

• 2006-12-13 11:33 g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll

Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez

• 2006-12-01 01:17 Re: Submitting tuning patches in stage 1
• 2006-12-01 20:49 Re: mainline slowdown
• 2006-12-01 23:32 [C/C++] same warning/error, different text
• 2006-12-04 19:51 Re: how to test multiple warnings?
• 2006-12-05 23:47 Re: how to test multiple warnings?
• 2006-12-11 15:40 Re: Accessing CVS
• 2006-12-14 20:40 Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects
• 2006-12-15 18:58 Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects
• 2006-12-17 12:55 [RFC] ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero warning in Wextra
• 2006-12-20 00:39 Re: [RFC] ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero warning in Wextra
• 2006-12-21 21:43 Re: question from imobilien

Tomaž Slivnik

• 2006-12-10 16:39 Build report for gcc 4.1.1 on powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0

Al Viro

• 2006-12-01 21:33 [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
• 2006-12-02 12:37 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
• 2006-12-02 12:43 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety

Alan Ong

• 2006-12-01 02:35 Help on compiling with Japanese Text

Aldy Hernandez

• 2006-12-04 20:57 words of caution and tuples merge update
• 2006-12-05 17:33 gimple-tuples-branch merged into mainline

Alexey Smirnov

• 2006-12-09 17:31 void* vector
• 2006-12-10 03:31 Re: void* vector

amylaar

• 2006-12-13 11:48 Re: 32 bit jump instruction.

Andrea Callia D'Iddio

• 2006-12-04 08:48 writing a new pass: association with an option string

Andreas Schwab

• 2006-12-11 19:12 Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3
• 2006-12-20 22:30 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-31 10:03 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Andreas Tobler

• 2006-12-09 22:12 Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3
• 2006-12-09 22:14 Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3
• 2006-12-30 21:01 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs

Andrew Haley

• 2006-12-05 11:18 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree
• 2006-12-06 12:28 Re: How to save a va_list object into a buffer and restore it from there?
• 2006-12-09 08:14 Re: Version of gcc , for which patch submitted?
• 2006-12-12 13:55 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs
• 2006-12-12 15:04 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs
• 2006-12-12 15:27 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs
• 2006-12-12 17:06 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs
• 2006-12-19 08:22 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 09:42 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 10:11 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 15:05 [ecj] Bump ABI version
• 2006-12-19 19:05 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 11:47 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 11:54 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-30 12:08 Re: Link tests not allowed
• 2006-12-31 12:38 Re: Link tests not allowed

Andrew MacLeod

• 2006-12-01 15:41 mainline slowdown
• 2006-12-01 15:57 Re: mainline slowdown
• 2006-12-01 16:06 Re: mainline slowdown
• 2006-12-01 19:13 Re: mainline slowdown
• 2006-12-01 19:18 Re: SPEC CFP2000 and polyhedron runtime scores dropped from 13. november onwards
• 2006-12-01 20:34 Re: mainline slowdown
• 2006-12-01 20:37 Re: mainline slowdown
• 2006-12-04 16:51 Re: [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1
• 2006-12-05 18:18 expand_builtin_memcpy bug exposed by TER and gfortran
• 2006-12-11 14:20 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...

Andrew Pinski

• 2006-12-02 03:58 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
• 2006-12-04 18:20 Re: setting up stack frame, regression (gcc 4.1.0) ?
• 2006-12-04 23:57 Re: const and strict aliasing rules
• 2006-12-05 00:30 Re: const and strict aliasing rules
• 2006-12-05 18:41 Re: expand_builtin_memcpy bug exposed by TER and gfortran
• 2006-12-08 06:44 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0
• 2006-12-08 06:55 Re: messages in objective-C
• 2006-12-11 08:04 [dataflow]: Status for spu-elf
• 2006-12-12 07:53 Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
• 2006-12-12 21:44 Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
• 2006-12-12 22:05 Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
• 2006-12-15 09:56 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS
• 2006-12-15 17:56 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS
• 2006-12-16 00:47 Re: 4.1.2 20060928 bug?: undefined overloaded friend function for function pointer
• 2006-12-19 07:12 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4)
• 2006-12-19 08:59 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 02:31 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 17:17 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 17:36 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-23 22:36 Re: x86_64, r120172: bootstrap error (In function `null_or_integer_zerop': undefined reference to `integer_zerop')
• 2006-12-29 16:14 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 16:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 17:31 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 00:39 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 00:46 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 01:46 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 07:51 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back?
• 2006-12-30 08:00 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 17:37 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
• 2006-12-30 17:38 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
• 2006-12-30 22:06 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
• 2006-12-30 22:14 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
• 2006-12-30 22:54 Re: getting source locations ....
• 2006-12-30 23:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 00:41 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Andrija Radicevic

• 2006-12-01 22:50 rtl dumps
• 2006-12-05 21:00 Re: poisened macro definitions

Anton Erasmus

• 2006-12-18 21:06 Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization

Arnd Bergmann

• 2006-12-02 10:48 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety

Art Haas

• 2006-12-04 21:38 Bootstrap failures with build/genextract

Ayal Zaks

• 2006-12-21 21:54 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?

Basile STARYNKEVITCH

• 2006-12-01 13:27 CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC
• 2006-12-05 12:34 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-05 20:05 destruction of GTY() data
• 2006-12-08 23:07 Re: destruction of GTY() data
• 2006-12-08 23:43 Re: destruction of GTY() data
• 2006-12-09 10:07 Re: destruction of GTY() data
• 2006-12-09 20:52 Re: destruction of GTY() data
• 2006-12-14 09:19 configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?
• 2006-12-14 14:53 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?
• 2006-12-14 16:47 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?
• 2006-12-14 20:14 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?
• 2006-12-30 22:42 getting source locations ....

Beman Dawes

• 2006-12-06 15:00 Implementation of C++ N2053?
• 2006-12-06 18:58 Re: Implementation of C++ N2053?

Ben Elliston

• 2006-12-06 23:52 Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string
• 2006-12-20 22:57 running bprob.exp tests in a cross-testing environment
• 2006-12-20 23:01 Re: running bprob.exp tests in a cross-testing environment

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2006-12-07 21:23 bootstrap failure x86/linux r119634

Benoit Jacob

• 2006-12-13 15:55 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll

Bernd Schmidt

• 2006-12-30 10:27 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 10:42 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 11:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 02:01 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 19:09 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Bob Rossi

• 2006-12-15 20:00 distributing g++
• 2006-12-16 03:45 Re: distributing g++
• 2006-12-16 20:57 relocatable gdb
• 2006-12-18 18:44 mingw build error

Bradley Lucier

• 2006-12-06 06:12 gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0
• 2006-12-06 07:10 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0
• 2006-12-06 07:42 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0
• 2006-12-07 03:47 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0
• 2006-12-08 18:04 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0

Brendon Costa

• 2006-12-02 03:04 Determining if a function has vague linkage
• 2006-12-02 22:50 Re: Determining if a function has vague linkage
• 2006-12-07 21:24 Understanding some EXPR nodes.
• 2006-12-08 03:50 Re: Understanding some EXPR nodes.

Brian Dessent

• 2006-12-15 20:35 Re: distributing g++

Brooks Moses

• 2006-12-05 04:08 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-18 21:36 GFortran testsuite problems with "dg-do compile"
• 2006-12-18 22:35 Re: GFortran testsuite problems with "dg-do compile"
• 2006-12-19 07:43 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?

Bruce Korb

• 2006-12-02 18:12 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-02 19:38 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-30 01:29 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 18:55 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Bruno Haible

• 2006-12-18 13:55 Re: libgomp crash fix
• 2006-12-19 21:54 Re: [bug-gnulib] GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 14:42 -fwrapv enables some optimizations

Chao-ying Fu

• 2006-12-01 18:16 Re: [Bug middle-end/29695] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Folding breaks (a & 0x80) ? 0x80 : 0 for unsigned char or unsigned short a

Chris Lattner

• 2006-12-17 21:00 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-18 17:16 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-18 17:40 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-18 18:13 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-18 18:47 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?

Christian Joensson

• 2006-12-14 11:49 [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds?
• 2006-12-15 10:32 [libgfortran, 4.2] Syntax error in array constructor
• 2006-12-15 11:00 Re: [libgfortran, 4.2] Syntax error in array constructor
• 2006-12-15 12:11 Re: [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds?

Christian Sturn

• 2006-12-29 19:33 Re: Compiler loop optimizations
• 2006-12-29 20:20 Re: Compiler loop optimizations

Christian Sturz

• 2006-12-28 13:08 Gprof and shared libraries
• 2006-12-28 19:51 Compiler loop optimizations

Come Lonfils

• 2006-12-06 16:19 messages in objective-C

Dale Johannesen

• 2006-12-12 20:03 Re: 32bit Calling conventions on linux/ppc.
• 2006-12-12 20:19 Re: 32bit Calling conventions on linux/ppc.

Dan Kegel

• 2006-12-11 10:47 re: ggdb3 information lost using temporary preprocessed file

Daniel Berlin

• 2006-12-01 15:07 Re: CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC
• 2006-12-01 16:45 Re: SPEC CFP2000 and polyhedron runtime scores dropped from 13. november onwards
• 2006-12-01 18:49 Re: mainline slowdown
• 2006-12-01 19:59 Re: mainline slowdown
• 2006-12-01 20:06 Re: mainline slowdown
• 2006-12-02 06:29 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
• 2006-12-05 18:00 Bootstrap broken on i686-darwin
• 2006-12-05 18:38 Re: Bootstrap broken on i686-darwin
• 2006-12-06 04:52 Re: destruction of GTY() data
• 2006-12-09 00:09 Re: destruction of GTY() data
• 2006-12-09 16:03 Re: destruction of GTY() data
• 2006-12-09 16:22 Re: Version of gcc , for which patch submitted?
• 2006-12-11 04:46 Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU
• 2006-12-11 05:27 Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU
• 2006-12-11 19:13 Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU
• 2006-12-21 17:21 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 18:14 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 19:37 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 20:03 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-28 20:40 Re: Compiler loop optimizations
• 2006-12-29 18:12 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 18:50 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 19:47 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 20:34 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 03:48 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 03:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 03:54 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 14:41 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Daniel Franke

• 2006-12-19 23:32 [fixincludes] PR29867 - building libgfortran fails
• 2006-12-23 17:32 x86_64, r120172: bootstrap error (In function `null_or_integer_zerop': undefined reference to `integer_zerop')
• 2006-12-23 22:45 Re: x86_64, r120172: bootstrap error (In function `null_or_integer_zerop': undefined reference to `integer_zerop')

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2006-12-10 06:13 Re: void* vector
• 2006-12-14 13:56 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?
• 2006-12-28 17:31 Re: Gprof and shared libraries
• 2006-12-29 21:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 22:52 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"
• 2006-12-30 03:56 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"
• 2006-12-30 07:01 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"
• 2006-12-30 07:08 Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back?

Dave Korn

• 2006-12-03 13:03 RE: Invoking static library automatically
• 2006-12-18 19:34 RE: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-20 00:28 RE: [RFC] ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero warning in Wextra
• 2006-12-20 01:22 RE: [RFC] ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero warning in Wextra
• 2006-12-20 02:34 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 02:53 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 20:02 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 03:41 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 04:09 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 04:15 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 18:15 [GCCWIKI] password reset borken?
• 2006-12-22 14:44 RE: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-22 17:08 RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-30 20:02 RE: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 19:52 RE: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

David Daney

• 2006-12-02 04:33 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
• 2006-12-07 06:40 Re: 32 bit jump instruction.
• 2006-12-11 06:47 Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...
• 2006-12-11 08:33 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...
• 2006-12-13 18:21 Re: why no boehm-gc tests?
• 2006-12-31 19:55 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

David Edelsohn

• 2006-12-04 17:09 Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer
• 2006-12-12 19:42 Re: 32bit Calling conventions on linux/ppc.
• 2006-12-12 20:07 Re: 32bit Calling conventions on linux/ppc.
• 2006-12-14 00:10 Eric Christopher appointed Darwin maintainer
• 2006-12-20 14:30 Re: Built and installed gcc on powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0

David Nicol

• 2006-12-04 19:00 Re: Optimizing a 16-bit * 8-bit -> 24-bit multiplication
• 2006-12-20 22:46 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 21:19 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?

Dawser Stevens

• 2006-12-16 00:24 Re: 4.1.2 20060928 bug?: undefined overloaded friend function for function pointer

Denis Vlasenko

• 2006-12-13 22:10 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll
• 2006-12-16 17:15 Re: distributing g++
• 2006-12-16 17:15 Re: distributing g++
• 2006-12-19 18:49 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 21:26 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 22:40 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 00:59 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 23:45 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-23 16:30 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?

Devang Patel

• 2006-12-07 01:02 Re: messages in objective-C

Diego Novillo

• 2006-12-04 13:14 Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string
• 2006-12-04 16:44 Re: [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1
• 2006-12-05 12:12 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-06 12:34 Re: How to save a va_list object into a buffer and restore it from there?
• 2006-12-06 13:07 Re: Gimple Type System
• 2006-12-06 14:51 Re: Gimple Type System
• 2006-12-15 13:29 Re: Help with traversing block statements in pragma handler
• 2006-12-15 15:18 Re: Help with traversing block statements in pragma handler
• 2006-12-21 16:55 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 19:06 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 19:10 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 19:17 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 19:24 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 20:07 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-22 14:30 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-22 19:53 [mem-ssa] Updated documentation

DJ Delorie

• 2006-12-04 20:34 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-05 02:27 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-05 13:09 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-06 15:36 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-20 23:09 Re: Profiling broken in GCC 4.1.0 for DJGPP
• 2006-12-30 00:16 Re: Link tests not allowed
• 2006-12-30 02:57 Re: Link tests not allowed
• 2006-12-31 19:55 Re: Link tests not allowed

djbomber at tiscali dot it

• 2006-12-05 17:23 Translate C# to C

Dominique Dhumieres

• 2006-12-09 22:05 failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3
• 2006-12-10 10:27 Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3
• 2006-12-23 18:28 building gcc4-4.3.0-20061223 on OSX 10.3 failed
• 2006-12-23 19:34 Re: building gcc4-4.3.0-20061223 on OSX 10.3 failed

Dorit Nuzman

• 2006-12-04 13:52 Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string
• 2006-12-18 11:18 Re: [RFC] centralizing vector support info in the testsuite
• 2006-12-19 21:58 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 22:11 Re: [RFC] centralizing vector support info in the testsuite
• 2006-12-19 22:32 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?

Douglas B Rupp

• 2006-12-29 23:45 Link tests not allowed
• 2006-12-30 02:50 Re: Link tests not allowed
• 2006-12-30 03:02 Re: Link tests not allowed
• 2006-12-30 19:44 Re: Link tests not allowed

Duncan Sands

• 2006-12-31 11:17 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 16:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Eric Blake

• 2006-12-30 14:35 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Eric Botcazou

• 2006-12-01 08:12 Re: Invoking static library automatically
• 2006-12-04 20:40 Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer
• 2006-12-12 06:31 Re: bogon in a gcc-testresults post (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)
• 2006-12-13 17:49 Re: libffi compilation failure on Solaris 10?
• 2006-12-14 12:10 Re: [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds?
• 2006-12-15 10:45 Re: [libgfortran, 4.2] Syntax error in array constructor
• 2006-12-15 11:33 Re: [libgfortran, 4.2] Syntax error in array constructor
• 2006-12-15 17:56 Re: [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds?

Eric Christopher

• 2006-12-06 20:17 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0
• 2006-12-07 09:01 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0
• 2006-12-23 19:24 Re: building gcc4-4.3.0-20061223 on OSX 10.3 failed

Erven ROHOU

• 2006-12-01 13:37 block reordering at GIMPLE level?

Ferad Zyulkyarov

• 2006-12-02 13:13 Re: About changing the tree structure in pragmas
• 2006-12-05 09:22 Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree
• 2006-12-05 11:15 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree
• 2006-12-06 19:49 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree
• 2006-12-07 14:21 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree
• 2006-12-07 15:28 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree
• 2006-12-15 10:02 Help with traversing block statements in pragma handler
• 2006-12-15 13:46 Re: Help with traversing block statements in pragma handler
• 2006-12-15 21:30 Re: distributing g++
• 2006-12-19 14:05 Re: Getting declaration tree node using func. name

Florian Weimer

• 2006-12-19 10:20 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 11:29 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 13:37 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 13:40 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-29 21:44 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 21:47 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Frank Riese

• 2006-12-13 21:05 Back End Responsibilities + RTL Generation
• 2006-12-15 08:06 Re: Back End Responsibilities + RTL Generation

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2006-12-04 10:25 Re: [C/C++] same warning/error, different text
• 2006-12-05 00:23 Re: const and strict aliasing rules
• 2006-12-05 01:40 Re: const and strict aliasing rules
• 2006-12-19 09:58 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 10:40 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 19:49 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 02:38 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 02:45 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 02:49 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 02:48 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-29 16:40 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 16:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 17:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 18:01 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 18:34 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 19:15 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 20:04 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 22:14 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 01:31 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 02:20 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 10:14 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 17:44 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-30 18:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 22:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 23:19 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 23:41 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 00:01 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 00:09 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 00:44 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 09:39 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 09:45 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 09:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 11:43 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 12:03 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 17:24 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 17:39 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 18:31 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 18:38 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 18:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 18:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 19:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

gccadmin

• 2006-12-01 22:42 gcc-4.1-20061201 is now available
• 2006-12-02 17:56 gcc-4.3-20061202 is now available
• 2006-12-05 17:54 gcc-4.2-20061205 is now available
• 2006-12-07 22:42 gcc-4.0-20061207 is now available
• 2006-12-08 22:43 gcc-4.1-20061208 is now available
• 2006-12-09 18:02 gcc-4.3-20061209 is now available
• 2006-12-12 17:56 gcc-4.2-20061212 is now available
• 2006-12-14 22:40 gcc-4.0-20061214 is now available
• 2006-12-15 22:43 gcc-4.1-20061215 is now available
• 2006-12-16 17:53 gcc-4.3-20061216 is now available
• 2006-12-19 17:57 gcc-4.2-20061219 is now available
• 2006-12-21 22:41 gcc-4.0-20061221 is now available
• 2006-12-22 22:43 gcc-4.1-20061222 is now available
• 2006-12-23 17:57 gcc-4.3-20061223 is now available
• 2006-12-26 17:56 gcc-4.2-20061226 is now available
• 2006-12-28 22:40 gcc-4.0-20061228 is now available
• 2006-12-29 22:40 gcc-4.1-20061229 is now available
• 2006-12-30 17:53 gcc-4.3-20061230 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2006-12-04 16:32 Re: MPFR precision when FLT_RADIX != 2
• 2006-12-05 17:21 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-21 04:21 Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations
• 2006-12-29 17:39 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2006-12-03 00:18 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-03 11:37 Re: compile time testsuite [Re: alias slowdown?]
• 2006-12-03 13:46 Re: build failure, GMP not available
• 2006-12-03 17:41 Re: compile time testsuite [Re: alias slowdown?]
• 2006-12-27 14:38 Re: poisened macro definitions
• 2006-12-28 08:55 Re: should fastjar be built?
• 2006-12-29 18:47 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?
• 2006-12-29 18:53 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS
• 2006-12-31 15:55 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Gordon . Schumacher

• 2006-12-12 18:54 Profiling broken in GCC 4.1.0 for DJGPP
• 2006-12-20 23:10 Re: Profiling broken in GCC 4.1.0 for DJGPP

Grigory Zagorodnev

• 2006-12-13 16:46 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32

H. J. Lu

• 2006-12-01 14:44 Re: -m{arch,tune}=native and Core Duo
• 2006-12-01 15:19 Re: -m{arch,tune}=native and Core Duo
• 2006-12-01 18:18 IA64 psABI discussion group created
• 2006-12-01 18:23 The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.8 is released
• 2006-12-01 23:51 Re: mainline slowdown
• 2006-12-06 07:00 Change x86 prefix order
• 2006-12-06 17:01 Re: Change x86 prefix order
• 2006-12-06 18:01 Re: Change x86 prefix order
• 2006-12-08 18:06 Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32
• 2006-12-08 18:55 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32
• 2006-12-10 20:17 "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU
• 2006-12-11 05:42 Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU
• 2006-12-11 05:46 Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU
• 2006-12-11 06:12 Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU
• 2006-12-11 14:33 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 and x86-64
• 2006-12-11 18:10 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32

h2005421

• 2006-12-09 05:26 Version of gcc , for which patch submitted?

Hoehenleitner, Thomas

• 2006-12-06 12:09 How to save a va_list object into a buffer and restore it from there?

Howard Hinnant

• 2006-12-04 18:37 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-04 22:45 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-05 01:20 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2006-12-05 15:04 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-05 15:06 Re: DBX format support
• 2006-12-05 15:16 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-06 15:27 Re: Implementation of C++ N2053?
• 2006-12-07 06:46 Re: DBX format support
• 2006-12-07 07:14 Re: 32 bit jump instruction.
• 2006-12-08 00:38 Re: Understanding some EXPR nodes.
• 2006-12-08 06:09 Re: Understanding some EXPR nodes.
• 2006-12-08 15:37 Re: Adding New Function Attributes
• 2006-12-12 16:54 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs
• 2006-12-13 06:23 Re: 32 bit jump instruction.
• 2006-12-13 15:47 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll
• 2006-12-14 15:30 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?
• 2006-12-14 17:01 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?
• 2006-12-18 17:30 Re: Defining cmd line symbolic literals
• 2006-12-19 20:08 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 15:23 Re: question from imobilien
• 2006-12-21 02:57 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 15:34 Re: Reload Pass
• 2006-12-21 18:11 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 19:55 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 22:57 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-23 05:30 Re: Saving the Tree declaration node in GCC 4.1.1.
• 2006-12-28 17:30 Re: Gprof and shared libraries
• 2006-12-28 17:33 Re: does zlib really need to build multilib?
• 2006-12-29 15:58 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 19:59 Re: Compiler loop optimizations
• 2006-12-29 20:38 Re: Compiler loop optimizations
• 2006-12-30 05:38 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"
• 2006-12-30 20:57 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
• 2006-12-31 07:55 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Ira Rosen

• 2006-12-10 10:55 Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc
• 2006-12-10 12:02 Re: Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc
• 2006-12-10 13:49 Re: Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc

Jack Howarth

• 2006-12-06 18:51 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0
• 2006-12-13 18:14 why no boehm-gc tests?
• 2006-12-28 04:58 should fastjar be built?
• 2006-12-28 15:00 does zlib really need to build multilib?

Jacquelyn Brooksavi

• 2006-12-04 21:27 packaging

Jagasia, Harsha

• 2006-12-01 00:29 Submitting tuning patches in stage 1
• 2006-12-01 19:55 call for 4.3 project reviewer for amdfam10 project

Jakub Jelinek

• 2006-12-01 07:24 Re: [Bug middle-end/29695] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Folding breaks (a & 0x80) ? 0x80 : 0 for unsigned char or unsigned short a
• 2006-12-12 15:53 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs
• 2006-12-12 16:19 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs

Jan Eissfeld

• 2006-12-20 14:08 question from imobilien

Jan Hubicka

• 2006-12-01 15:06 Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level?
• 2006-12-04 12:26 Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level?
• 2006-12-18 20:58 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
• 2006-12-19 13:49 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
• 2006-12-30 12:00 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
• 2006-12-31 00:00 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
• 2006-12-31 01:39 Re: Nested libcalls (was: Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs)

Jan Kratochvil

• 2006-12-11 19:03 Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs
• 2006-12-12 15:50 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs
• 2006-12-13 20:46 [PATCH] Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs

Janis Johnson

• 2006-12-01 00:15 Re: how to test multiple warnings?
• 2006-12-05 22:08 Re: how to test multiple warnings?
• 2006-12-06 01:04 Re: how to test multiple warnings?
• 2006-12-15 01:13 [RFC] centralizing vector support info in the testsuite
• 2006-12-18 18:26 Re: [RFC] centralizing vector support info in the testsuite
• 2006-12-21 18:03 Re: question from imobilien
• 2006-12-21 23:47 Re: question from imobilien
• 2006-12-22 01:01 Re: running bprob.exp tests in a cross-testing environment

Jeffrey Law

• 2006-12-21 17:49 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 17:54 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 18:51 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-22 06:44 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-22 06:44 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-22 06:44 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-22 06:44 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?

Jobs-SA

• 2006-12-07 17:09 Job openings
• 2006-12-07 17:09 Job openings
• 2006-12-08 00:34 Job openings
• 2006-12-08 00:34 Job openings

Joe Buck

• 2006-12-01 19:10 Re: CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC
• 2006-12-02 21:04 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
• 2006-12-04 17:48 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-04 19:13 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-05 02:53 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-11 23:56 bogon in a gcc-testresults post (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)
• 2006-12-16 00:43 Re: 4.1.2 20060928 bug?: undefined overloaded friend function for function pointer
• 2006-12-16 01:02 Re: 4.1.2 20060928 bug?: undefined overloaded friend function for function pointer
• 2006-12-19 21:21 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 21:54 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 16:37 Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations
• 2006-12-31 01:34 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 01:40 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 06:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 06:55 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Joern Rennecke

• 2006-12-13 08:05 Re: 32 bit jump instruction.

John L. Kulp

• 2006-12-04 23:54 const and strict aliasing rules

jonatha at qx dot net

• 2006-12-20 14:15 Built and installed gcc on powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0

Joseph S. Myers

• 2006-12-04 23:24 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-19 13:23 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 13:41 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 13:45 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 15:50 Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations
• 2006-12-21 20:26 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 23:14 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?

Josh Conner

• 2006-12-15 01:37 Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS
• 2006-12-15 02:11 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS

Kai Tietz

• 2006-12-22 11:38 Re Fixme in driver-i386.c

Karl Berry

• 2006-12-31 19:37 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Kaveh R. GHAZI

• 2006-12-02 17:02 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-02 18:57 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-03 13:57 [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1
• 2006-12-03 14:30 [4.2 PATCH INSTALLED]: Recommend MPFR 2.2.1
• 2006-12-03 17:44 MPFR precision when FLT_RADIX != 2
• 2006-12-05 02:32 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-06 14:40 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-06 15:02 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-23 17:40 Re: [bug-gnulib] GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-30 18:31 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 18:57 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Kaz Kojima

• 2006-12-11 13:46 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...
• 2006-12-11 23:02 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...
• 2006-12-12 00:03 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...

Kimmo Fredriksson

• 2006-12-04 13:48 setting up stack frame, regression (gcc 4.1.0) ?

Kyle Moffett

• 2006-12-02 09:24 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety

Laurent GUERBY

• 2006-12-14 20:17 Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects
• 2006-12-15 18:47 Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects

Laurynas Biveinis

• 2006-12-05 21:13 Re: destruction of GTY() data
• 2006-12-20 23:05 Re: Profiling broken in GCC 4.1.0 for DJGPP

linuxkaffee

• 2006-12-10 12:50 Questions on -ftest-coverage and gcov

Marc Espie

• 2006-12-29 23:36 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 00:27 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Marcin Dalecki

• 2006-12-15 18:11 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS
• 2006-12-20 11:17 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4)
• 2006-12-20 22:42 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 23:48 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 21:53 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 22:33 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 23:08 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?

Marco Rinaudo - Internet.bs Corp.

• 2006-12-21 12:41 3 new GCC mirrors

Mark Kettenis

• 2006-12-12 14:54 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs
• 2006-12-12 17:35 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs

Mark Mitchell

• 2006-12-04 01:26 Re: [C/C++] same warning/error, different text
• 2006-12-05 00:56 Re: [PATCH] Canonical types (1/3)
• 2006-12-05 16:33 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-12 18:05 Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
• 2006-12-12 21:54 Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
• 2006-12-12 22:42 Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.
• 2006-12-19 03:49 Paolo Bonzini appointed build system maintainer

Mark Shinwell

• 2006-12-14 12:44 libjvm.la and problems with libtool relink mode

Markus Franke

• 2006-12-05 20:37 poisened macro definitions
• 2006-12-22 10:58 needed headerfiles in <machine>.c

Matthew Woehlke

• 2006-12-20 16:55 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 21:43 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?

Maurizio Vitale

• 2006-12-20 01:32 alignment attribute for stack allocated objects

Meissner, Michael

• 2006-12-11 19:34 RE: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32

Menezes, Evandro

• 2006-12-08 19:02 RE: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32
• 2006-12-11 17:35 RE: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32
• 2006-12-13 17:11 RE: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32

Michael Eager

• 2006-12-14 18:55 MULTILIB_MATCHES question
• 2006-12-15 00:07 Re: MULTILIB_MATCHES question

Michael Gong

• 2006-12-18 14:25 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?

Michael Matz

• 2006-12-13 18:02 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs
• 2006-12-13 18:10 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs
• 2006-12-13 18:11 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs

Michael Veksler

• 2006-12-21 12:22 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 14:32 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 15:32 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-31 09:32 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 13:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Mikael Pettersson

• 2006-12-06 17:52 Re: Change x86 prefix order

Mike Stump

• 2006-12-04 16:40 Re: [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1
• 2006-12-05 19:15 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree
• 2006-12-05 22:09 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-06 21:59 Re: messages in objective-C
• 2006-12-15 05:43 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS
• 2006-12-15 09:43 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS
• 2006-12-15 15:33 Re: [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds?
• 2006-12-15 17:28 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS
• 2006-12-20 02:19 Re: alignment attribute for stack allocated objects
• 2006-12-20 02:41 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?

Mohamed Shafi

• 2006-12-06 13:56 Re: poisened macro definitions
• 2006-12-18 06:17 Defining cmd line symbolic literals

Nils Springob

• 2006-12-18 23:08 Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization

Olivier Galibert

• 2006-12-02 21:22 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety

Paolo Bonzini

• 2006-12-01 14:46 Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level?
• 2006-12-01 15:35 Re: CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC
• 2006-12-01 16:03 Re: CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC
• 2006-12-05 11:03 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-14 08:43 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll
• 2006-12-14 16:58 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?
• 2006-12-15 09:02 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS
• 2006-12-15 09:49 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS
• 2006-12-19 10:38 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 10:59 Re: Paolo Bonzini appointed build system maintainer
• 2006-12-19 13:40 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 17:01 Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations
• 2006-12-21 13:15 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 13:30 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 14:42 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 08:00 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 08:25 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-29 10:35 Re: does zlib really need to build multilib?
• 2006-12-29 16:39 [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"
• 2006-12-30 08:15 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"
• 2006-12-30 08:17 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?

Paolo Carlini

• 2006-12-04 17:25 Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer
• 2006-12-04 20:48 Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer

Paul Brook

• 2006-12-05 15:08 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-05 23:14 Re: Packing of structure fields and whole structs
• 2006-12-15 01:59 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS
• 2006-12-15 15:12 Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS
• 2006-12-18 03:19 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-18 18:06 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-19 21:46 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 22:58 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 02:45 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 03:56 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 02:03 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 02:57 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?

Paul Eggert

• 2006-12-19 09:36 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 09:44 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 18:46 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 19:32 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 21:53 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 23:44 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 07:50 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-29 07:11 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 08:20 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-29 08:55 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-29 21:29 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 22:06 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 23:44 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 00:13 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 00:35 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 01:09 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 02:06 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 07:41 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 07:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 08:43 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 22:20 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 00:13 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 05:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 05:57 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 06:09 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 07:30 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 09:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 18:47 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 19:38 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Paul Schlie

• 2006-12-18 01:15 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-18 10:25 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-20 03:50 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-20 04:26 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-29 22:16 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 17:07 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 18:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Paul Thomas

• 2006-12-18 21:50 Re: GFortran testsuite problems with "dg-do compile"

Phil Endecott

• 2006-12-05 22:40 Packing of structure fields and whole structs

Philipp Thomas

• 2006-12-01 16:28 Re: Help on compiling with Japanese Text

Picasso Middle East | Events Team

• 2006-12-08 08:57 Picasso Events Team

RAHUL V R

• 2006-12-05 14:09 DBX format support
• 2006-12-07 04:44 Re: DBX format support

Rajasekaran Periyasamy

• 2006-12-08 05:02 ELDK Cross complier hang

Rajkishore Barik

• 2006-12-21 07:49 Reload Pass
• 2006-12-22 05:11 Re: Reload Pass

Ralf Wildenhues

• 2006-12-14 17:32 Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?
• 2006-12-19 05:54 GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4)

Randy Dunlap

• 2006-12-06 16:42 Re: Change x86 prefix order

Rask Ingemann Lambertsen

• 2006-12-17 20:40 Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-18 18:20 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-18 18:23 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-23 09:07 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-23 17:29 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?

Revital1 Eres

• 2006-12-04 09:10 Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string
• 2006-12-04 13:48 Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string
• 2006-12-05 11:04 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree
• 2006-12-07 13:38 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree
• 2006-12-07 14:37 Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree

Richard B. Kreckel

• 2006-12-19 23:11 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4)
• 2006-12-20 21:48 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 23:11 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 20:48 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-29 21:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Richard Guenther

• 2006-12-01 16:17 Re: SPEC CFP2000 and polyhedron runtime scores dropped from 13. november onwards
• 2006-12-04 16:24 Re: [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1
• 2006-12-04 16:27 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-04 21:57 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-04 22:18 Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer
• 2006-12-04 22:30 Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer
• 2006-12-04 23:08 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-04 23:38 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-05 15:55 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-05 20:44 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-05 22:53 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-07 15:52 Re: compile time testsuite [Re: alias slowdown?]
• 2006-12-10 11:37 Re: Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc
• 2006-12-10 13:52 Re: Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc
• 2006-12-13 16:55 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32
• 2006-12-13 17:18 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32
• 2006-12-14 12:50 Re: libjvm.la and problems with libtool relink mode
• 2006-12-29 19:06 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 21:43 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 21:57 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 12:22 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 22:59 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 23:30 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 10:57 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 11:04 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 11:24 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 11:46 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 14:45 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 19:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 20:00 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Richard Kenner

• 2006-12-04 19:05 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-18 19:06 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-29 22:48 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"
• 2006-12-29 23:27 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 23:33 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"
• 2006-12-29 23:41 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 00:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 04:03 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 04:12 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 05:03 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 05:25 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"
• 2006-12-30 05:26 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 05:43 Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"
• 2006-12-30 05:45 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 12:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 13:03 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 13:04 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 22:25 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 23:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 23:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 00:09 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 00:24 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 01:45 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 01:49 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 01:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 13:15 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 13:20 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 13:28 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 13:33 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 13:45 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 13:54 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 13:58 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 14:03 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 14:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 14:30 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 15:15 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 15:19 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 15:20 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 15:22 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 16:32 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 18:13 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 19:40 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 20:40 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Richard Warburton

• 2006-12-06 12:59 Gimple Type System
• 2006-12-06 14:45 Re: Gimple Type System

Robert Dewar

• 2006-12-18 17:24 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-18 17:53 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-18 18:27 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-18 19:31 Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?
• 2006-12-19 08:13 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 08:42 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 09:04 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 11:11 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 11:15 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 11:18 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 11:37 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 11:47 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 13:34 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 13:41 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 13:47 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-19 13:49 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 02:13 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 02:15 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 02:17 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 03:27 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 03:28 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 03:29 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 10:45 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 11:56 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 12:01 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 13:51 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 04:21 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 04:34 Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations
• 2006-12-21 22:17 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 22:40 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 22:42 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 02:06 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 04:02 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 17:29 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 17:31 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-29 19:02 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-29 20:03 Re: Compiler loop optimizations
• 2006-12-29 22:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 02:19 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 02:25 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 05:38 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 11:48 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 13:14 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 23:52 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 00:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 00:22 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 00:28 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 00:30 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 01:00 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 01:02 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 01:07 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 01:20 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 03:12 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 13:07 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 13:29 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 13:55 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 13:56 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 14:22 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 14:27 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 15:07 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 16:01 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 16:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 16:13 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 16:39 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 17:04 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 17:27 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 19:11 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 19:15 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Robert Kennedy

• 2006-12-21 16:37 SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 18:43 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 18:47 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 18:57 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 19:01 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 19:52 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 20:03 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-21 21:38 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?

Roberto Bagnara

• 2006-12-22 06:47 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-22 08:23 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?

Roberto COSTA

• 2006-12-04 11:50 Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level?
• 2006-12-04 12:48 Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level?
• 2006-12-05 17:37 Re: Translate C# to C

Rohit Arul Raj

• 2006-12-01 07:46 Invoking static library automatically
• 2006-12-07 05:49 32 bit jump instruction.
• 2006-12-08 07:19 Adding New Function Attributes
• 2006-12-11 15:30 Accessing CVS
• 2006-12-13 05:42 Re: 32 bit jump instruction.
• 2006-12-19 13:23 Getting declaration tree node using func. name
• 2006-12-20 07:53 Error due to function call while checking fn attributes
• 2006-12-20 08:45 Re: Getting declaration tree node using func. name
• 2006-12-22 12:37 Saving the Tree declaration node in GCC 4.1.1.

Roland McGrath

• 2006-12-11 22:40 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs

Ryan Hill

• 2006-12-01 09:50 -m{arch,tune}=native and Core Duo

s b

• 2006-12-11 09:37 ggdb3 information lost using temporary preprocessed file

Sandeep Kumar

• 2006-12-13 11:12 Memory allocation for local variables.

Scott Robert Ladd

• 2006-12-29 21:28 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Seongbae Park

• 2006-12-20 20:16 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-30 00:02 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 01:11 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-30 03:59 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Shaun Jackman

• 2006-12-02 00:29 Optimizing a 16-bit * 8-bit -> 24-bit multiplication
• 2006-12-04 23:00 Bizarre inlining type promotion effect
• 2006-12-05 00:00 Re: Bizarre inlining type promotion effect
• 2006-12-18 18:28 Re: AVR byte swap optimization
• 2006-12-18 21:57 Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization
• 2006-12-18 22:05 Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization
• 2006-12-19 00:48 Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization

Steve Ellcey

• 2006-12-11 18:34 Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3

Steve Kargl

• 2006-12-04 16:42 Re: MPFR precision when FLT_RADIX != 2
• 2006-12-06 06:35 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0
• 2006-12-06 07:20 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0
• 2006-12-06 18:27 Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0
• 2006-12-19 03:11 Re: GFortran testsuite problems with "dg-do compile"

Steven Bosscher

• 2006-12-01 23:12 Re: rtl dumps
• 2006-12-05 19:52 Re: expand_builtin_memcpy bug exposed by TER and gfortran
• 2006-12-09 17:35 Re: void* vector
• 2006-12-11 07:24 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...
• 2006-12-11 10:53 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...
• 2006-12-11 14:16 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...
• 2006-12-11 23:18 Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...
• 2006-12-13 10:02 Re: 32 bit jump instruction.
• 2006-12-13 12:12 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll
• 2006-12-13 12:13 Re: Memory allocation for local variables.
• 2006-12-14 07:32 Re: Back End Responsibilities + RTL Generation
• 2006-12-14 07:58 Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll
• 2006-12-30 11:04 Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back?
• 2006-12-31 01:03 Nested libcalls (was: Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs)
• 2006-12-31 08:47 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Stewart Stremler

• 2006-12-13 13:49 Re: libffi compilation failure on Solaris 10?

Tehila Meyzels

• 2006-12-10 13:14 Fw: Questions on -ftest-coverage and gcov
• 2006-12-10 13:24 Re: Fw: Questions on -ftest-coverage and gcov

Thomas Gleixner

• 2006-12-02 12:56 Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety

Thomas Neumann

• 2006-12-29 20:07 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Thomas Schwinge

• 2006-12-15 10:17 Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects
• 2006-12-15 21:16 Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects

Tom Tromey

• 2006-12-20 19:57 Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations
• 2006-12-28 19:05 Re: does zlib really need to build multilib?

Toon Moene

• 2006-12-03 15:41 Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-05 20:28 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-05 20:38 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-05 22:47 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-06 20:46 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-08 00:22 Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)
• 2006-12-27 15:09 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?

Ulrich Drepper

• 2006-12-12 15:20 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs
• 2006-12-12 15:39 Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs

Ulrich Weigand

• 2006-12-04 18:55 Re: Reload Problem in delete_output_reload
• 2006-12-05 11:55 Re: Reload Problem in delete_output_reload

Unruh, Erwin

• 2006-12-04 10:56 Reload Problem in delete_output_reload
• 2006-12-05 10:02 RE: Reload Problem in delete_output_reload
• 2006-12-05 15:44 RE: Reload Problem in delete_output_reload

Uros Bizjak

• 2006-12-01 15:44 SPEC CFP2000 and polyhedron runtime scores dropped from 13. november onwards
• 2006-12-08 18:39 Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32
• 2006-12-11 21:30 Re: What's the status of autovectorization for MMX and 3DNow!?
• 2006-12-22 11:23 Fixme in driver-i386.c

Vincent Lefevre

• 2006-12-03 00:51 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-03 01:03 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-05 02:00 Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released
• 2006-12-24 21:59 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-24 22:21 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-24 23:39 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-30 16:56 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-30 18:06 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 11:24 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 12:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 14:04 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 14:16 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 14:39 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 14:48 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 15:09 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 15:21 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 15:47 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 15:59 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 16:08 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."
• 2006-12-31 16:24 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Vladimir N. Makarov

• 2006-12-22 15:51 Re: Reload Pass

Vladimir Yanovsky

• 2006-12-18 20:48 RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
• 2006-12-19 12:43 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
• 2006-12-28 16:37 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs
• 2006-12-31 12:15 Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs

Zack Weinberg

• 2006-12-05 20:24 Re:: destruction of GTY() data

Zdenek Dvorak

• 2006-12-19 11:41 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-20 11:46 Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?
• 2006-12-21 19:18 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-22 12:56 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-24 08:09 Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?
• 2006-12-31 11:10 Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."

Zuxy Meng

• 2006-12-11 07:30 What's the status of autovectorization for MMX and 3DNow!?

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)