gcc archive
date index for December, 2006

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

December 31, 2006

20:40	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
20:00	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Guenther
19:55	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	David Daney
19:55	Re: Link tests not allowed	DJ Delorie
19:52	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:52	RE: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Dave Korn
19:40	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
19:38	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
19:37	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Karl Berry
19:21	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Guenther
19:15	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
19:11	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
19:09	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Bernd Schmidt
18:56	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:55	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Bruce Korb
18:49	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Schlie
18:49	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:47	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
18:38	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:31	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:13	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
17:39	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:27	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
17:24	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:07	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Schlie
17:04	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
16:52	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Duncan Sands
16:39	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
16:32	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
16:24	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Vincent Lefevre
16:13	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
16:10	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
16:08	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Vincent Lefevre
16:01	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
15:59	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Vincent Lefevre
15:55	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gerald Pfeifer
15:47	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Vincent Lefevre
15:22	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
15:21	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Vincent Lefevre
15:20	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
15:19	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
15:15	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
15:09	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Vincent Lefevre
15:07	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
14:48	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Vincent Lefevre
14:45	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Guenther
14:41	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Daniel Berlin
14:39	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Vincent Lefevre
14:30	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
14:27	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
14:22	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
14:16	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Vincent Lefevre
14:10	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
14:04	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Vincent Lefevre
14:03	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
13:58	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
13:56	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
13:56	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Michael Veksler
13:55	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
13:54	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
13:45	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
13:33	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
13:29	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
13:28	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
13:20	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
13:15	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
13:07	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
12:38	Re: Link tests not allowed	Andrew Haley
12:15	Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Vladimir Yanovsky
12:10	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Vincent Lefevre
12:03	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:46	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Guenther
11:43	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:24	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Vincent Lefevre
11:24	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Guenther
11:17	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Duncan Sands
11:10	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Zdenek Dvorak
11:04	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Guenther
10:57	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Guenther
10:03	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Andreas Schwab
09:49	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
09:49	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
09:45	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
09:39	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
09:32	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Michael Veksler
08:47	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Steven Bosscher
07:55	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Ian Lance Taylor
07:30	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
06:55	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Joe Buck
06:49	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Joe Buck
06:09	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
05:57	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
05:52	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
03:12	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
02:01	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Bernd Schmidt
01:52	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
01:49	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
01:45	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
01:40	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Joe Buck
01:39	Re: Nested libcalls (was: Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs)	Jan Hubicka
01:34	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Joe Buck
01:20	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
01:07	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
01:03	Nested libcalls (was: Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs)	Steven Bosscher
01:02	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
01:00	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
00:44	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:41	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Andrew Pinski
00:30	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
00:28	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
00:24	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
00:22	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
00:21	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
00:13	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
00:09	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
00:09	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:01	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:00	Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Jan Hubicka

December 30, 2006

23:56	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
23:56	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Andrew Pinski
23:52	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
23:41	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:30	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Guenther
23:19	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:10	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
22:59	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Guenther
22:56	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:54	Re: getting source locations ....	Andrew Pinski
22:42	getting source locations ....	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
22:25	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
22:20	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
22:14	Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Andrew Pinski
22:06	Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Andrew Pinski
21:01	Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Andreas Tobler
20:57	Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Ian Lance Taylor
20:02	RE: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Dave Korn
19:44	Re: Link tests not allowed	Douglas B Rupp
18:57	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Kaveh R. GHAZI
18:52	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:31	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Kaveh R. GHAZI
18:06	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Vincent Lefevre
17:53	gcc-4.3-20061230 is now available	gccadmin
17:44	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:38	Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Andrew Pinski
17:37	Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Andrew Pinski
16:56	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Vincent Lefevre
14:35	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Eric Blake
13:14	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
13:04	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
13:03	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
12:56	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
12:22	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Guenther
12:08	Re: Link tests not allowed	Andrew Haley
12:00	Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Jan Hubicka
11:48	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
11:10	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Bernd Schmidt
11:04	Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back?	Steven Bosscher
10:42	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Bernd Schmidt
10:27	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Bernd Schmidt
10:14	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
08:43	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
08:17	Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?	Paolo Bonzini
08:15	Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"	Paolo Bonzini
08:00	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Andrew Pinski
07:56	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
07:51	Re: Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back?	Andrew Pinski
07:41	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
07:08	Do we want non-bootstrapping "make" back?	Daniel Jacobowitz
07:01	Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"	Daniel Jacobowitz
05:45	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
05:43	Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"	Richard Kenner
05:38	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
05:38	Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"	Ian Lance Taylor
05:26	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
05:25	Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"	Richard Kenner
05:03	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
04:12	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
04:03	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
03:59	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Seongbae Park
03:56	Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"	Daniel Jacobowitz
03:54	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Daniel Berlin
03:49	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Daniel Berlin
03:48	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Daniel Berlin
03:02	Re: Link tests not allowed	Douglas B Rupp
02:57	Re: Link tests not allowed	DJ Delorie
02:50	Re: Link tests not allowed	Douglas B Rupp
02:25	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
02:20	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:19	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
02:06	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
01:46	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Andrew Pinski
01:31	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:29	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Bruce Korb
01:11	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Seongbae Park
01:09	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
00:46	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Andrew Pinski
00:39	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Andrew Pinski
00:35	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
00:27	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Marc Espie
00:21	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
00:16	Re: Link tests not allowed	DJ Delorie
00:13	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
00:02	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Seongbae Park

December 29, 2006

23:45	Link tests not allowed	Douglas B Rupp
23:44	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
23:41	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
23:36	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Marc Espie
23:33	Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"	Richard Kenner
23:27	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Kenner
22:52	Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"	Daniel Jacobowitz
22:48	Re: [heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"	Richard Kenner
22:40	gcc-4.1-20061229 is now available	gccadmin
22:21	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
22:16	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Schlie
22:14	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:06	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
21:57	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Guenther
21:56	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard B. Kreckel
21:52	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Daniel Jacobowitz
21:47	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Florian Weimer
21:44	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Florian Weimer
21:43	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Guenther
21:29	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert
21:28	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Scott Robert Ladd
20:38	Re: Compiler loop optimizations	Ian Lance Taylor
20:34	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Daniel Berlin
20:20	Re: Compiler loop optimizations	Christian Sturn
20:07	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Thomas Neumann
20:04	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:03	Re: Compiler loop optimizations	Robert Dewar
19:59	Re: Compiler loop optimizations	Ian Lance Taylor
19:47	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Daniel Berlin
19:33	Re: Compiler loop optimizations	Christian Sturn
19:15	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:06	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Richard Guenther
19:02	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Robert Dewar
18:53	Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS	Gerald Pfeifer
18:50	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Daniel Berlin
18:47	Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?	Gerald Pfeifer
18:34	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:12	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Daniel Berlin
18:01	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:39	Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll	Geert Bosch
17:31	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Andrew Pinski
17:21	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:52	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Andrew Pinski
16:49	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:40	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:39	[heads-up] disabling "../configure --disable-bootstrap && make bootstrap"	Paolo Bonzini
16:14	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Andrew Pinski
15:58	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Ian Lance Taylor
10:35	Re: does zlib really need to build multilib?	Paolo Bonzini
08:55	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Eggert
08:20	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Eggert
07:11	Re: changing "configure" to default to "gcc -g -O2 -fwrapv ..."	Paul Eggert

December 28, 2006

22:40	gcc-4.0-20061228 is now available	gccadmin
20:40	Re: Compiler loop optimizations	Daniel Berlin
19:51	Compiler loop optimizations	Christian Sturz
19:05	Re: does zlib really need to build multilib?	Tom Tromey
17:33	Re: does zlib really need to build multilib?	Ian Lance Taylor
17:31	Re: Gprof and shared libraries	Daniel Jacobowitz
17:30	Re: Gprof and shared libraries	Ian Lance Taylor
16:37	Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Vladimir Yanovsky
15:00	does zlib really need to build multilib?	Jack Howarth
13:08	Gprof and shared libraries	Christian Sturz
08:55	Re: should fastjar be built?	Gerald Pfeifer
04:58	should fastjar be built?	Jack Howarth

December 27, 2006

15:09	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Toon Moene
14:38	Re: poisened macro definitions	Gerald Pfeifer

December 26, 2006

17:56

gcc-4.2-20061226 is now available

gccadmin

December 24, 2006

23:39	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Vincent Lefevre
22:21	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Vincent Lefevre
21:59	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Vincent Lefevre
08:09	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Zdenek Dvorak

December 23, 2006

22:45	Re: x86_64, r120172: bootstrap error (In function `null_or_integer_zerop': undefined reference to `integer_zerop')	Daniel Franke
22:36	Re: x86_64, r120172: bootstrap error (In function `null_or_integer_zerop': undefined reference to `integer_zerop')	Andrew Pinski
19:34	Re: building gcc4-4.3.0-20061223 on OSX 10.3 failed	Dominique Dhumieres
19:24	Re: building gcc4-4.3.0-20061223 on OSX 10.3 failed	Eric Christopher
18:28	building gcc4-4.3.0-20061223 on OSX 10.3 failed	Dominique Dhumieres
17:57	gcc-4.3-20061223 is now available	gccadmin
17:40	Re: [bug-gnulib] GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Kaveh R. GHAZI
17:32	x86_64, r120172: bootstrap error (In function `null_or_integer_zerop': undefined reference to `integer_zerop')	Daniel Franke
17:29	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
16:30	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Denis Vlasenko
09:07	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
05:30	Re: Saving the Tree declaration node in GCC 4.1.1.	Ian Lance Taylor

December 22, 2006

23:45	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Denis Vlasenko
22:43	gcc-4.1-20061222 is now available	gccadmin
19:53	[mem-ssa] Updated documentation	Diego Novillo
17:36	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Andrew Pinski
17:31	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
17:29	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
17:17	RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Andrew Pinski
17:08	RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Dave Korn
15:51	Re: Reload Pass	Vladimir N. Makarov
14:44	RE: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Dave Korn
14:30	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Diego Novillo
12:56	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Zdenek Dvorak
12:37	Saving the Tree declaration node in GCC 4.1.1.	Rohit Arul Raj
11:38	Re Fixme in driver-i386.c	Kai Tietz
11:23	Fixme in driver-i386.c	Uros Bizjak
10:58	needed headerfiles in <machine>.c	Markus Franke
08:25	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paolo Bonzini
08:23	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Roberto Bagnara
08:00	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paolo Bonzini
07:50	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Eggert
06:47	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Roberto Bagnara
06:44	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Jeffrey Law
06:44	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Jeffrey Law
06:44	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Jeffrey Law
06:44	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Jeffrey Law
05:11	Re: Reload Pass	Rajkishore Barik
04:02	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
02:57	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Brook
02:48	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:06	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
02:03	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Brook
01:01	Re: running bprob.exp tests in a cross-testing environment	Janis Johnson
00:59	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Denis Vlasenko

December 21, 2006

23:47	Re: question from imobilien	Janis Johnson
23:44	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Eggert
23:14	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Joseph S. Myers
23:08	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Marcin Dalecki
22:57	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Ian Lance Taylor
22:42	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
22:41	gcc-4.0-20061221 is now available	gccadmin
22:40	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
22:33	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Marcin Dalecki
22:17	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
21:54	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Ayal Zaks
21:53	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Eggert
21:53	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Marcin Dalecki
21:43	Re: question from imobilien	Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
21:38	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Robert Kennedy
21:19	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	David Nicol
20:48	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Richard B. Kreckel
20:26	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Joseph S. Myers
20:07	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Diego Novillo
20:03	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Robert Kennedy
20:03	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Daniel Berlin
19:55	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Ian Lance Taylor
19:52	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Robert Kennedy
19:37	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Daniel Berlin
19:32	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Eggert
19:24	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Diego Novillo
19:18	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Zdenek Dvorak
19:17	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Diego Novillo
19:10	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Diego Novillo
19:06	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Diego Novillo
19:01	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Robert Kennedy
18:57	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Robert Kennedy
18:51	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Jeffrey Law
18:47	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Robert Kennedy
18:43	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Robert Kennedy
18:15	[GCCWIKI] password reset borken?	Dave Korn
18:14	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Daniel Berlin
18:11	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Ian Lance Taylor
18:03	Re: question from imobilien	Janis Johnson
17:54	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Jeffrey Law
17:49	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Jeffrey Law
17:21	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Daniel Berlin
16:55	Re: SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Diego Novillo
16:37	SSA_NAMES: should there be an unused, un-free limbo?	Robert Kennedy
15:34	Re: Reload Pass	Ian Lance Taylor
15:32	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Michael Veksler
14:42	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paolo Bonzini
14:32	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Michael Veksler
13:30	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paolo Bonzini
13:15	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paolo Bonzini
12:41	3 new GCC mirrors	Marco Rinaudo - Internet.bs Co
12:22	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Michael Veksler
07:49	Reload Pass	Rajkishore Barik
04:34	Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations	Robert Dewar
04:21	Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations	Geert Bosch
04:21	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
04:15	RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Dave Korn
04:09	RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Dave Korn
03:56	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Brook
03:41	RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Dave Korn
02:57	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Ian Lance Taylor
02:49	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:45	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:38	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Gabriel Dos Reis

December 20, 2006

23:48	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Marcin Dalecki
23:11	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Richard B. Kreckel
23:10	Re: Profiling broken in GCC 4.1.0 for DJGPP	Gordon . Schumacher
23:09	Re: Profiling broken in GCC 4.1.0 for DJGPP	DJ Delorie
23:05	Re: Profiling broken in GCC 4.1.0 for DJGPP	Laurynas Biveinis
23:01	Re: running bprob.exp tests in a cross-testing environment	Ben Elliston
22:57	running bprob.exp tests in a cross-testing environment	Ben Elliston
22:46	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	David Nicol
22:42	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Marcin Dalecki
22:30	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Andreas Schwab
21:48	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Richard B. Kreckel
21:43	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Matthew Woehlke
20:16	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Seongbae Park
20:02	RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Dave Korn
19:57	Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations	Tom Tromey
17:01	Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations	Paolo Bonzini
16:55	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Matthew Woehlke
16:37	Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations	Joe Buck
15:50	Re: -fwrapv enables some optimizations	Joseph S. Myers
15:23	Re: question from imobilien	Ian Lance Taylor
14:42	-fwrapv enables some optimizations	Bruno Haible
14:30	Re: Built and installed gcc on powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0	David Edelsohn
14:15	Built and installed gcc on powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0	jonatha at qx dot net
14:08	question from imobilien	Jan Eissfeld
13:51	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
12:01	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
11:56	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
11:54	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Andrew Haley
11:47	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Andrew Haley
11:46	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Zdenek Dvorak
11:17	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4)	Marcin Dalecki
10:45	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
08:45	Re: Getting declaration tree node using func. name	Rohit Arul Raj
07:53	Error due to function call while checking fn attributes	Rohit Arul Raj
04:26	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Schlie
03:50	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Paul Schlie
03:29	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
03:28	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
03:27	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
02:53	RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Dave Korn
02:45	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Brook
02:41	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Mike Stump
02:34	RE: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Dave Korn
02:31	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Andrew Pinski
02:19	Re: alignment attribute for stack allocated objects	Mike Stump
02:17	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
02:15	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
02:13	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
01:32	alignment attribute for stack allocated objects	Maurizio Vitale
01:22	RE: [RFC] ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero warning in Wextra	Dave Korn
00:39	Re: [RFC] ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero warning in Wextra	Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
00:28	RE: [RFC] ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero warning in Wextra	Dave Korn

December 19, 2006

23:32	[fixincludes] PR29867 - building libgfortran fails	Daniel Franke
23:11	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4)	Richard B. Kreckel
22:58	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Brook
22:40	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Denis Vlasenko
22:32	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Dorit Nuzman
22:11	Re: [RFC] centralizing vector support info in the testsuite	Dorit Nuzman
21:58	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Dorit Nuzman
21:54	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Joe Buck
21:54	Re: [bug-gnulib] GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Bruno Haible
21:46	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Brook
21:26	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Denis Vlasenko
21:21	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Joe Buck
20:08	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Ian Lance Taylor
19:49	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:05	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Andrew Haley
18:49	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Denis Vlasenko
18:46	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Eggert
17:57	gcc-4.2-20061219 is now available	gccadmin
15:05	[ecj] Bump ABI version	Andrew Haley
14:05	Re: Getting declaration tree node using func. name	Ferad Zyulkyarov
13:49	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
13:49	Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Jan Hubicka
13:47	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
13:45	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Joseph S. Myers
13:41	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
13:41	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Joseph S. Myers
13:40	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Florian Weimer
13:40	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paolo Bonzini
13:37	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Florian Weimer
13:34	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
13:23	Getting declaration tree node using func. name	Rohit Arul Raj
13:23	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Joseph S. Myers
12:43	Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Vladimir Yanovsky
11:47	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
11:41	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Zdenek Dvorak
11:37	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
11:29	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Florian Weimer
11:18	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
11:15	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
11:11	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
10:59	Re: Paolo Bonzini appointed build system maintainer	Paolo Bonzini
10:40	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:38	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paolo Bonzini
10:20	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Florian Weimer
10:11	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Andrew Haley
09:58	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Gabriel Dos Reis
09:44	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Eggert
09:42	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Andrew Haley
09:36	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Paul Eggert
09:04	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
08:59	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Andrew Pinski
08:42	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
08:22	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Andrew Haley
08:13	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Robert Dewar
07:43	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature?	Brooks Moses
07:12	Re: GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4)	Andrew Pinski
05:54	GCC optimizes integer overflow: bug or feature? (was: avoid integer overflow in mktime.m4)	Ralf Wildenhues
03:49	Paolo Bonzini appointed build system maintainer	Mark Mitchell
03:11	Re: GFortran testsuite problems with "dg-do compile"	Steve Kargl
00:48	Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization	Shaun Jackman

December 18, 2006

23:08	Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization	Nils Springob
22:35	Re: GFortran testsuite problems with "dg-do compile"	Brooks Moses
22:05	Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization	Shaun Jackman
21:57	Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization	Shaun Jackman
21:50	Re: GFortran testsuite problems with "dg-do compile"	Paul Thomas
21:36	GFortran testsuite problems with "dg-do compile"	Brooks Moses
21:06	Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR byte swap optimization	Anton Erasmus
20:58	Re: RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Jan Hubicka
20:48	RFC: SMS problem with emit_copy_of_insn_after copying REG_NOTEs	Vladimir Yanovsky
19:34	RE: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Dave Korn
19:31	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Robert Dewar
19:06	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Richard Kenner
18:47	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Chris Lattner
18:44	mingw build error	Bob Rossi
18:28	Re: AVR byte swap optimization	Shaun Jackman
18:27	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Robert Dewar
18:26	Re: [RFC] centralizing vector support info in the testsuite	Janis Johnson
18:23	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
18:20	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
18:13	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Chris Lattner
18:06	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Paul Brook
17:53	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Robert Dewar
17:40	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Chris Lattner
17:30	Re: Defining cmd line symbolic literals	Ian Lance Taylor
17:24	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Robert Dewar
17:16	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Chris Lattner
14:25	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Michael Gong
13:55	Re: libgomp crash fix	Bruno Haible
11:18	Re: [RFC] centralizing vector support info in the testsuite	Dorit Nuzman
10:25	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Paul Schlie
06:17	Defining cmd line symbolic literals	Mohamed Shafi
03:19	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Paul Brook
01:15	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Paul Schlie

December 17, 2006

21:00	Re: Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Chris Lattner
20:40	Char shifts promoted to int. Why?	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
12:55	[RFC] ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero warning in Wextra	Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez

December 16, 2006

20:57	relocatable gdb	Bob Rossi
17:53	gcc-4.3-20061216 is now available	gccadmin
17:15	Re: distributing g++	Denis Vlasenko
17:15	Re: distributing g++	Denis Vlasenko
03:45	Re: distributing g++	Bob Rossi
01:02	Re: 4.1.2 20060928 bug?: undefined overloaded friend function for function pointer	Joe Buck
00:47	Re: 4.1.2 20060928 bug?: undefined overloaded friend function for function pointer	Andrew Pinski
00:43	Re: 4.1.2 20060928 bug?: undefined overloaded friend function for function pointer	Joe Buck
00:24	Re: 4.1.2 20060928 bug?: undefined overloaded friend function for function pointer	Dawser Stevens

December 15, 2006

22:43	gcc-4.1-20061215 is now available	gccadmin
21:30	Re: distributing g++	Ferad Zyulkyarov
21:16	Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects	Thomas Schwinge
20:35	Re: distributing g++	Brian Dessent
20:00	distributing g++	Bob Rossi
18:58	Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects	Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
18:47	Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects	Laurent GUERBY
18:11	Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS	Marcin Dalecki
17:56	Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS	Andrew Pinski
17:56	Re: [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds?	Eric Botcazou
17:28	Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS	Mike Stump
15:33	Re: [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds?	Mike Stump
15:18	Re: Help with traversing block statements in pragma handler	Diego Novillo
15:12	Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS	Paul Brook
13:46	Re: Help with traversing block statements in pragma handler	Ferad Zyulkyarov
13:29	Re: Help with traversing block statements in pragma handler	Diego Novillo
12:11	Re: [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds?	Christian Joensson
11:33	Re: [libgfortran, 4.2] Syntax error in array constructor	Eric Botcazou
11:00	Re: [libgfortran, 4.2] Syntax error in array constructor	Christian Joensson
10:45	Re: [libgfortran, 4.2] Syntax error in array constructor	Eric Botcazou
10:32	[libgfortran, 4.2] Syntax error in array constructor	Christian Joensson
10:17	Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects	Thomas Schwinge
10:02	Help with traversing block statements in pragma handler	Ferad Zyulkyarov
09:56	Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS	Andrew Pinski
09:49	Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS	Paolo Bonzini
09:43	Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS	Mike Stump
09:02	Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS	Paolo Bonzini
08:06	Re: Back End Responsibilities + RTL Generation	Frank Riese
05:43	Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS	Mike Stump
02:11	Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS	Josh Conner
01:59	Re: Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS	Paul Brook
01:37	Question on BOOT_CFLAGS vs. CFLAGS	Josh Conner
01:13	[RFC] centralizing vector support info in the testsuite	Janis Johnson
00:07	Re: MULTILIB_MATCHES question	Michael Eager

December 14, 2006

22:40	gcc-4.0-20061214 is now available	gccadmin
20:40	Re: Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects	Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
20:17	Compile Farm : one year uptime, call for projects	Laurent GUERBY
20:14	Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
18:55	MULTILIB_MATCHES question	Michael Eager
17:32	Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?	Ralf Wildenhues
17:01	Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?	Ian Lance Taylor
16:58	Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?	Paolo Bonzini
16:47	Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:30	Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?	Ian Lance Taylor
14:53	Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
13:56	Re: configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?	Daniel Jacobowitz
12:50	Re: libjvm.la and problems with libtool relink mode	Richard Guenther
12:44	libjvm.la and problems with libtool relink mode	Mark Shinwell
12:10	Re: [infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds?	Eric Botcazou
11:49	[infrastructure] what about gmp and mpfr on multilibbed builds?	Christian Joensson
09:19	configuration options policy (at toplevel or only inside gcc/)?	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
08:43	Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll	Paolo Bonzini
08:07	Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll	Benoît Jacob
07:58	Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll	Steven Bosscher
07:54	Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll	Benoît Jacob
07:32	Re: Back End Responsibilities + RTL Generation	Steven Bosscher
00:10	Eric Christopher appointed Darwin maintainer	David Edelsohn

December 13, 2006

22:10	Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll	Denis Vlasenko
21:05	Back End Responsibilities + RTL Generation	Frank Riese
20:46	[PATCH] Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Jan Kratochvil
18:21	Re: why no boehm-gc tests?	David Daney
18:14	why no boehm-gc tests?	Jack Howarth
18:11	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Michael Matz
18:10	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Michael Matz
18:02	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Michael Matz
17:49	Re: libffi compilation failure on Solaris 10?	Eric Botcazou
17:18	Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32	Richard Guenther
17:11	RE: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32	Menezes, Evandro
16:55	Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32	Richard Guenther
16:46	Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32	Grigory Zagorodnev
15:55	Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll	Benoit Jacob
15:47	Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll	Ian Lance Taylor
13:49	Re: libffi compilation failure on Solaris 10?	Stewart Stremler
13:05	Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll	Benoît Jacob
12:13	Re: Memory allocation for local variables.	Steven Bosscher
12:12	Re: g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll	Steven Bosscher
11:48	Re: 32 bit jump instruction.	amylaar
11:33	g++ doesn't unroll a loop it should unroll	Benoît Jacob
11:12	Memory allocation for local variables.	Sandeep Kumar
10:02	Re: 32 bit jump instruction.	Steven Bosscher
08:05	Re: 32 bit jump instruction.	Joern Rennecke
06:23	Re: 32 bit jump instruction.	Ian Lance Taylor
05:42	Re: 32 bit jump instruction.	Rohit Arul Raj

December 12, 2006

22:42	Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.	Mark Mitchell
22:05	Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.	Andrew Pinski
21:54	Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.	Mark Mitchell
21:44	Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.	Andrew Pinski
20:19	Re: 32bit Calling conventions on linux/ppc.	Dale Johannesen
20:07	Re: 32bit Calling conventions on linux/ppc.	David Edelsohn
20:03	Re: 32bit Calling conventions on linux/ppc.	Dale Johannesen
19:42	Re: 32bit Calling conventions on linux/ppc.	David Edelsohn
18:54	Profiling broken in GCC 4.1.0 for DJGPP	Gordon . Schumacher
18:05	Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.	Mark Mitchell
17:56	gcc-4.2-20061212 is now available	gccadmin
17:35	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Mark Kettenis
17:06	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Andrew Haley
16:54	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Ian Lance Taylor
16:19	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Jakub Jelinek
15:53	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Jakub Jelinek
15:50	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Jan Kratochvil
15:39	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Ulrich Drepper
15:27	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Andrew Haley
15:20	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Ulrich Drepper
15:04	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Andrew Haley
14:54	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Mark Kettenis
13:55	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Andrew Haley
07:53	Re: [PATCH] Relocated compiler should not look in $prefix.	Andrew Pinski
06:31	Re: bogon in a gcc-testresults post (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)	Eric Botcazou
00:03	Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...	Kaz Kojima

December 11, 2006

23:56	bogon in a gcc-testresults post (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)	Joe Buck
23:18	Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...	Steven Bosscher
23:02	Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...	Kaz Kojima
22:40	Re: Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Roland McGrath
21:30	Re: What's the status of autovectorization for MMX and 3DNow!?	Uros Bizjak
19:34	RE: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32	Meissner, Michael
19:13	Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU	Daniel Berlin
19:12	Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3	Andreas Schwab
19:03	Unwinding CFI gcc practice of assumed `same value' regs	Jan Kratochvil
18:34	Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3	Steve Ellcey
18:10	Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32	H. J. Lu
17:35	RE: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32	Menezes, Evandro
15:40	Re: Accessing CVS	Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
15:30	Accessing CVS	Rohit Arul Raj
14:33	Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32 and x86-64	H. J. Lu
14:20	Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...	Andrew MacLeod
14:16	Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...	Steven Bosscher
13:46	Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...	Kaz Kojima
10:53	Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...	Steven Bosscher
10:47	re: ggdb3 information lost using temporary preprocessed file	Dan Kegel
09:37	ggdb3 information lost using temporary preprocessed file	s b
08:33	Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...	David Daney
08:04	[dataflow]: Status for spu-elf	Andrew Pinski
07:30	What's the status of autovectorization for MMX and 3DNow!?	Zuxy Meng
07:24	Re: Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...	Steven Bosscher
06:47	Bootstrap broken on mipsel-linux...	David Daney
06:12	Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU	H. J. Lu
05:46	Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU	H. J. Lu
05:42	Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU	H. J. Lu
05:27	Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU	Daniel Berlin
04:46	Re: "Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU	Daniel Berlin

December 10, 2006

20:17	"Fix alias slowdown" patch miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU	H. J. Lu
16:39	Build report for gcc 4.1.1 on powerpc-apple-darwin8.8.0	Tomaž Slivnik
13:52	Re: Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc	Richard Guenther
13:49	Re: Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc	Ira Rosen
13:24	Re: Fw: Questions on -ftest-coverage and gcov	Tehila Meyzels
13:14	Fw: Questions on -ftest-coverage and gcov	Tehila Meyzels
12:50	Questions on -ftest-coverage and gcov	linuxkaffee
12:02	Re: Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc	Ira Rosen
11:37	Re: Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc	Richard Guenther
10:55	Someone broke vectorizer testcases on powerpc	Ira Rosen
10:27	Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3	Dominique Dhumieres
06:13	Re: void* vector	Daniel Jacobowitz
03:31	Re: void* vector	Alexey Smirnov

December 09, 2006

22:14	Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3	Andreas Tobler
22:12	Re: failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3	Andreas Tobler
22:05	failed to compile gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c on OSX 10.3	Dominique Dhumieres
20:52	Re: destruction of GTY() data	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
18:02	gcc-4.3-20061209 is now available	gccadmin
17:35	Re: void* vector	Steven Bosscher
17:31	void* vector	Alexey Smirnov
16:22	Re: Version of gcc , for which patch submitted?	Daniel Berlin
16:03	Re: destruction of GTY() data	Daniel Berlin
10:07	Re: destruction of GTY() data	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
08:14	Re: Version of gcc , for which patch submitted?	Andrew Haley
05:26	Version of gcc , for which patch submitted?	h2005421
00:09	Re: destruction of GTY() data	Daniel Berlin

December 08, 2006

23:43	Re: destruction of GTY() data	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
23:07	Re: destruction of GTY() data	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
22:43	gcc-4.1-20061208 is now available	gccadmin
19:02	RE: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32	Menezes, Evandro
18:55	Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32	H. J. Lu
18:39	Re: Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32	Uros Bizjak
18:06	Serious SPEC CPU 2006 FP performance regressions on IA32	H. J. Lu
18:04	Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0	Bradley Lucier
15:37	Re: Adding New Function Attributes	Ian Lance Taylor
08:57	Picasso Events Team	Picasso Middle East | Events T
07:19	Adding New Function Attributes	Rohit Arul Raj
06:55	Re: messages in objective-C	Andrew Pinski
06:44	Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0	Andrew Pinski
06:09	Re: Understanding some EXPR nodes.	Ian Lance Taylor
05:02	ELDK Cross complier hang	Rajasekaran Periyasamy
03:50	Re: Understanding some EXPR nodes.	Brendon Costa
00:38	Re: Understanding some EXPR nodes.	Ian Lance Taylor
00:34	Job openings	Jobs-SA
00:34	Job openings	Jobs-SA
00:22	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Toon Moene

December 07, 2006

22:42	gcc-4.0-20061207 is now available	gccadmin
21:24	Understanding some EXPR nodes.	Brendon Costa
21:23	bootstrap failure x86/linux r119634	Benjamin Kosnik
17:09	Job openings	Jobs-SA
17:09	Job openings	Jobs-SA
15:52	Re: compile time testsuite [Re: alias slowdown?]	Richard Guenther
15:28	Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree	Ferad Zyulkyarov
14:37	Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree	Revital1 Eres
14:21	Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree	Ferad Zyulkyarov
13:38	Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree	Revital1 Eres
09:01	Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0	Eric Christopher
07:14	Re: 32 bit jump instruction.	Ian Lance Taylor
06:46	Re: DBX format support	Ian Lance Taylor
06:40	Re: 32 bit jump instruction.	David Daney
05:49	32 bit jump instruction.	Rohit Arul Raj
04:44	Re: DBX format support	RAHUL V R
03:47	Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0	Bradley Lucier
01:02	Re: messages in objective-C	Devang Patel

December 06, 2006

23:52	Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string	Ben Elliston
21:59	Re: messages in objective-C	Mike Stump
20:46	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Toon Moene
20:17	Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0	Eric Christopher
19:49	Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree	Ferad Zyulkyarov
18:58	Re: Implementation of C++ N2053?	Beman Dawes
18:51	Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0	Jack Howarth
18:27	Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0	Steve Kargl
18:01	Re: Change x86 prefix order	H. J. Lu
17:52	Re: Change x86 prefix order	Mikael Pettersson
17:01	Re: Change x86 prefix order	H. J. Lu
16:42	Re: Change x86 prefix order	Randy Dunlap
16:19	messages in objective-C	Come Lonfils
15:36	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	DJ Delorie
15:27	Re: Implementation of C++ N2053?	Ian Lance Taylor
15:02	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:00	Implementation of C++ N2053?	Beman Dawes
14:51	Re: Gimple Type System	Diego Novillo
14:45	Re: Gimple Type System	Richard Warburton
14:40	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Kaveh R. GHAZI
13:56	Re: poisened macro definitions	Mohamed Shafi
13:07	Re: Gimple Type System	Diego Novillo
12:59	Gimple Type System	Richard Warburton
12:34	Re: How to save a va_list object into a buffer and restore it from there?	Diego Novillo
12:28	Re: How to save a va_list object into a buffer and restore it from there?	Andrew Haley
12:09	How to save a va_list object into a buffer and restore it from there?	Hoehenleitner, Thomas
07:42	Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0	Bradley Lucier
07:20	Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0	Steve Kargl
07:10	Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0	Bradley Lucier
07:00	Change x86 prefix order	H. J. Lu
06:35	Re: gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0	Steve Kargl
06:12	gfortran testsuite failures with 4.3.0 on powerpc64-apple-darwin8.8.0	Bradley Lucier
04:52	Re: destruction of GTY() data	Daniel Berlin
01:04	Re: how to test multiple warnings?	Janis Johnson

December 05, 2006

23:47	Re: how to test multiple warnings?	Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
23:14	Re: Packing of structure fields and whole structs	Paul Brook
22:53	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Richard Guenther
22:47	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Toon Moene
22:40	Packing of structure fields and whole structs	Phil Endecott
22:09	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Mike Stump
22:08	Re: how to test multiple warnings?	Janis Johnson
21:13	Re: destruction of GTY() data	Laurynas Biveinis
21:00	Re: poisened macro definitions	Andrija Radicevic
20:44	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Richard Guenther
20:38	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Toon Moene
20:37	poisened macro definitions	Markus Franke
20:28	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Toon Moene
20:24	Re:: destruction of GTY() data	Zack Weinberg
20:05	destruction of GTY() data	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
19:52	Re: expand_builtin_memcpy bug exposed by TER and gfortran	Steven Bosscher
19:15	Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree	Mike Stump
18:41	Re: expand_builtin_memcpy bug exposed by TER and gfortran	Andrew Pinski
18:38	Re: Bootstrap broken on i686-darwin	Daniel Berlin
18:18	expand_builtin_memcpy bug exposed by TER and gfortran	Andrew MacLeod
18:00	Bootstrap broken on i686-darwin	Daniel Berlin
17:54	gcc-4.2-20061205 is now available	gccadmin
17:37	Re: Translate C# to C	Roberto COSTA
17:33	gimple-tuples-branch merged into mainline	Aldy Hernandez
17:23	Translate C# to C	djbomber at tiscali dot it
17:21	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Geert Bosch
16:33	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Mark Mitchell
15:55	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Richard Guenther
15:44	RE: Reload Problem in delete_output_reload	Unruh, Erwin
15:16	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Ian Lance Taylor
15:08	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Paul Brook
15:06	Re: DBX format support	Ian Lance Taylor
15:04	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Ian Lance Taylor
14:09	DBX format support	RAHUL V R
13:09	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	DJ Delorie
12:34	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:12	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Diego Novillo
11:55	Re: Reload Problem in delete_output_reload	Ulrich Weigand
11:18	Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree	Andrew Haley
11:15	Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree	Ferad Zyulkyarov
11:04	Re: Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree	Revital1 Eres
11:03	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Paolo Bonzini
10:02	RE: Reload Problem in delete_output_reload	Unruh, Erwin
09:22	Interface for manipulating the abstract syntax tree	Ferad Zyulkyarov
04:08	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Brooks Moses
02:53	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Joe Buck
02:32	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Kaveh R. GHAZI
02:27	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	DJ Delorie
02:00	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Vincent Lefevre
01:40	Re: const and strict aliasing rules	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:20	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Howard Hinnant
00:56	Re: [PATCH] Canonical types (1/3)	Mark Mitchell
00:30	Re: const and strict aliasing rules	Andrew Pinski
00:23	Re: const and strict aliasing rules	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:00	Re: Bizarre inlining type promotion effect	Shaun Jackman

December 04, 2006

23:57	Re: const and strict aliasing rules	Andrew Pinski
23:54	const and strict aliasing rules	John L. Kulp
23:38	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Richard Guenther
23:24	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Joseph S. Myers
23:08	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Richard Guenther
23:00	Bizarre inlining type promotion effect	Shaun Jackman
22:45	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Howard Hinnant
22:30	Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer	Richard Guenther
22:18	Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer	Richard Guenther
21:57	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Richard Guenther
21:38	Bootstrap failures with build/genextract	Art Haas
21:27	packaging	Jacquelyn Brooksavi
20:57	words of caution and tuples merge update	Aldy Hernandez
20:48	Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer	Paolo Carlini
20:40	Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer	Eric Botcazou
20:34	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	DJ Delorie
19:51	Re: how to test multiple warnings?	Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
19:13	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Joe Buck
19:05	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Richard Kenner
19:00	Re: Optimizing a 16-bit * 8-bit -> 24-bit multiplication	David Nicol
18:55	Re: Reload Problem in delete_output_reload	Ulrich Weigand
18:37	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Howard Hinnant
18:20	Re: setting up stack frame, regression (gcc 4.1.0) ?	Andrew Pinski
17:48	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Joe Buck
17:25	Re: Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer	Paolo Carlini
17:09	Richard Guenther appointed middle-end maintainer	David Edelsohn
16:51	Re: [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1	Andrew MacLeod
16:44	Re: [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1	Diego Novillo
16:42	Re: MPFR precision when FLT_RADIX != 2	Steve Kargl
16:40	Re: [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1	Mike Stump
16:32	Re: MPFR precision when FLT_RADIX != 2	Geert Bosch
16:27	Re: Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Richard Guenther
16:24	Re: [PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1	Richard Guenther
13:52	Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string	Dorit Nuzman
13:48	setting up stack frame, regression (gcc 4.1.0) ?	Kimmo Fredriksson
13:48	Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string	Revital1 Eres
13:14	Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string	Diego Novillo
12:48	Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level?	Roberto COSTA
12:26	Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level?	Jan Hubicka
11:50	Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level?	Roberto COSTA
10:56	Reload Problem in delete_output_reload	Unruh, Erwin
10:25	Re: [C/C++] same warning/error, different text	Gabriel Dos Reis
09:10	Re: writing a new pass: association with an option string	Revital1 Eres
08:48	writing a new pass: association with an option string	Andrea Callia D'Iddio
01:26	Re: [C/C++] same warning/error, different text	Mark Mitchell

December 03, 2006

17:44	MPFR precision when FLT_RADIX != 2	Kaveh R. GHAZI
17:41	Re: compile time testsuite [Re: alias slowdown?]	Gerald Pfeifer
15:41	Gfortran and using C99 cbrt for X ** (1./3.)	Toon Moene
14:30	[4.2 PATCH INSTALLED]: Recommend MPFR 2.2.1	Kaveh R. GHAZI
13:57	[PATCH]: Require MPFR 2.2.1	Kaveh R. GHAZI
13:46	Re: build failure, GMP not available	Gerald Pfeifer
13:03	RE: Invoking static library automatically	Dave Korn
11:37	Re: compile time testsuite [Re: alias slowdown?]	Gerald Pfeifer
01:03	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Vincent Lefevre
00:51	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Vincent Lefevre
00:18	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Gerald Pfeifer

December 02, 2006

22:50	Re: Determining if a function has vague linkage	Brendon Costa
21:22	Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety	Olivier Galibert
21:04	Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety	Joe Buck
19:38	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Bruce Korb
18:57	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Kaveh R. GHAZI
18:12	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Bruce Korb
17:56	gcc-4.3-20061202 is now available	gccadmin
17:02	Re: Announce: MPFR 2.2.1 is released	Kaveh R. GHAZI
13:13	Re: About changing the tree structure in pragmas	Ferad Zyulkyarov
12:56	Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety	Thomas Gleixner
12:43	Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety	Al Viro
12:37	Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety	Al Viro
10:48	Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety	Arnd Bergmann
09:24	Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety	Kyle Moffett
06:29	Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety	Daniel Berlin
04:33	Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety	David Daney
03:58	Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety	Andrew Pinski
03:04	Determining if a function has vague linkage	Brendon Costa
00:29	Optimizing a 16-bit * 8-bit -> 24-bit multiplication	Shaun Jackman

December 01, 2006

23:51	Re: mainline slowdown	H. J. Lu
23:32	[C/C++] same warning/error, different text	Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
23:12	Re: rtl dumps	Steven Bosscher
22:50	rtl dumps	Andrija Radicevic
22:42	gcc-4.1-20061201 is now available	gccadmin
21:33	[RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety	Al Viro
20:49	Re: mainline slowdown	Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
20:37	Re: mainline slowdown	Andrew MacLeod
20:34	Re: mainline slowdown	Andrew MacLeod
20:06	Re: mainline slowdown	Daniel Berlin
19:59	Re: mainline slowdown	Daniel Berlin
19:55	call for 4.3 project reviewer for amdfam10 project	Jagasia, Harsha
19:18	Re: SPEC CFP2000 and polyhedron runtime scores dropped from 13. november onwards	Andrew MacLeod
19:13	Re: mainline slowdown	Andrew MacLeod
19:10	Re: CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC	Joe Buck
18:49	Re: mainline slowdown	Daniel Berlin
18:23	The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.8 is released	H. J. Lu
18:18	IA64 psABI discussion group created	H. J. Lu
18:16	Re: [Bug middle-end/29695] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Folding breaks (a & 0x80) ? 0x80 : 0 for unsigned char or unsigned short a	Chao-ying Fu
16:45	Re: SPEC CFP2000 and polyhedron runtime scores dropped from 13. november onwards	Daniel Berlin
16:28	Re: Help on compiling with Japanese Text	Philipp Thomas
16:17	Re: SPEC CFP2000 and polyhedron runtime scores dropped from 13. november onwards	Richard Guenther
16:06	Re: mainline slowdown	Andrew MacLeod
16:03	Re: CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC	Paolo Bonzini
15:57	Re: mainline slowdown	Andrew MacLeod
15:44	SPEC CFP2000 and polyhedron runtime scores dropped from 13. november onwards	Uros Bizjak
15:41	mainline slowdown	Andrew MacLeod
15:35	Re: CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC	Paolo Bonzini
15:19	Re: -m{arch,tune}=native and Core Duo	H. J. Lu
15:07	Re: CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC	Daniel Berlin
15:06	Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level?	Jan Hubicka
14:46	Re: block reordering at GIMPLE level?	Paolo Bonzini
14:44	Re: -m{arch,tune}=native and Core Duo	H. J. Lu
13:37	block reordering at GIMPLE level?	Erven ROHOU
13:27	CEA (France) has signed assignment of copyright to FSF on GCC	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
09:50	-m{arch,tune}=native and Core Duo	Ryan Hill
08:12	Re: Invoking static library automatically	Eric Botcazou
07:46	Invoking static library automatically	Rohit Arul Raj
07:24	Re: [Bug middle-end/29695] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Folding breaks (a & 0x80) ? 0x80 : 0 for unsigned char or unsigned short a	Jakub Jelinek
02:35	Help on compiling with Japanese Text	Alan Ong
01:17	Re: Submitting tuning patches in stage 1	Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
00:29	Submitting tuning patches in stage 1	Jagasia, Harsha
00:15	Re: how to test multiple warnings?	Janis Johnson

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)