This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Re: Canonical type nodes, or, comptypes considered harmful

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Doug Gregor <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:11:42 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Canonical type nodes, or, comptypes considered harmful
References: <24b520d20611200158y248b83e7x8835c31796b55576@mail.gmail.com> <200611211406.kALE6Agh014467@porkchop.devel.redhat.com> <24b520d20611211106h6e587dv7f816c1439ec8096@mail.gmail.com>

Doug Gregor wrote:

I think the fact that we're using precompiled headers for most of the
libstdc++ testing means that we're not spending as much time in
parsing templates as we'd expect.

... redoing the test after having manually removed the PCHs would not be a big deal...

Anyway, Doug, thanks for working on this!

Paolo.

References:
- [PATCH] Re: Canonical type nodes, or, comptypes considered harmful
  - From: Doug Gregor
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Canonical type nodes, or, comptypes considered harmful
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Canonical type nodes, or, comptypes considered harmful
  - From: Doug Gregor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]