This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GIMPLE issues and status of gimple-tuples

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: nkavv at physics dot auth dot gr
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:04:10 -0800
Subject: Re: GIMPLE issues and status of gimple-tuples
References: <1163861984.455f1fe00bd1a@mail.physics.auth.gr> <4aca3dc20611180754g7bfa5092g7c1831513363eab1@mail.gmail.com> <1163908630.455fd61649a19@mail.physics.auth.gr>

On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 05:57 +0200, nkavv@physics.auth.gr wrote:
> > Errr, LOOP_EXPR doesn't actually exist anymore :)
> > Loops are always lowered to if-then-else and gotos.
> 
> That's nice! I'll check on how things are handled now. Is this true for latest
> release, mainline - current gcc trunk, or gimple-tuples?

It has been true since low-gimple came about which came about before
4.0.0 was released.
low-gimple means Ifs are also converted to "a?goto b;:goto c;"

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GIMPLE issues and status of gimple-tuples
  - From: Nikolaos Kavvadias

References:
- GIMPLE issues and status of gimple-tuples
  - From: nkavv
- Re: GIMPLE issues and status of gimple-tuples
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: GIMPLE issues and status of gimple-tuples
  - From: nkavv

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]