This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
From: Mark Shinwell <shinwell@codesourcery.com>TabonyEE@austin.rr.com wrote:[snip]My port, based on (GCC) 4.2.0 20061002 (experimental), is producing incorrect code for the following test case:
I've only had a very quick look at your code, but I have a feeling thatthis is an instance of the kind of slip-up with GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESSthat my patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00858.html is
aimed at preventing. (This patch is currently only applied to addrmodesbranch.)
Mark
Hhmm. Is the intent of your patch simply to prevent the mistake of backends not defining GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS properly?
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |