This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: build failure, GMP not available

From: "Steven Bosscher" <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>
Cc: "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, "Geoffrey Keating" <geoffk at apple dot com>, "GCC Mailing List" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:35:17 +0100
Subject: Re: build failure, GMP not available
References: <76B13B3C-DB38-4D40-9DEE-B1ADC71379FC@apple.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0610301610520.13143@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <m3ac3d9srs.fsf@dhcp-172-18-118-195.corp.google.com> <4546E82B.2080703@codesourcery.com> <m3wt6h7z2c.fsf@dhcp-172-18-118-195.corp.google.com>

On 30 Oct 2006 22:56:59 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:

I'm certainly not saying that we should pull out GMP and MPFR.  But I
am saying that we need to do much much better about making it easy for
people to build gcc.


Can't we just make it so that, if gmp/  amd mpfr/ directories exist in
the toplevel, they are built along with GCC?  I don't mean actually
including gmp and mpfr in the gcc SVN repo, but just making it
possible to build them when someone unpacks gmp/mpfr tarballs in the
toplevel dir.

Gr.
Steven

Follow-Ups:
- Re: build failure, GMP not available
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- build failure, GMP not available
  - From: Geoffrey Keating
- Re: build failure, GMP not available
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: build failure, GMP not available
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: build failure, GMP not available
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: build failure, GMP not available
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]