This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: build failure, GMP not available


One more thing, I initially went down the road of including the GMP/ MPFR
sources in the gcc tree and building them as part of the bootstrap
process. But the consensus was not to do that:


http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-10/msg00167.html

I think the problem is that Mark also said


I do think we should do is provide a known-good version (whether via a tag in some version control system, or via a tarball) of these libraries so that people can easily get versions that work.

and this is the part that didn't work; it's not good enough to think that a good version might exist, you need to know what it actually is, because knowing what it is might change your opinion on whether it's good...


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]