This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][RFC] -EB / -EL don't properly affect gcc predefined symbols

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: Hiroki Kaminaga <kaminaga at sm dot sony dot co dot jp>
Cc: ralf at linux-mips dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:57:03 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] -EB / -EL don't properly affect gcc predefined symbols
References: <1160663165.17889.10.camel@celery.andrew.com> <20061013.143248.74755270.kaminaga@sm.sony.co.jp> <1160718348.18649.7.camel@celery.andrew.com> <20061013.144540.41627586.kaminaga@sm.sony.co.jp>

On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 14:45 +0900, Hiroki Kaminaga wrote:
> How about appending to CC1_SPEC?
> 
> -#ifndef CC1_SPEC
> +#undef CC1_SPEC
>  #define CC1_SPEC "\
>  %{gline:%{!g:%{!g0:%{!g1:%{!g2: -g1}}}}} \
>  %{G*} %{EB:-meb} %{EL:-mel} %{EB:%{EL:%emay not use both -EB and -EL}} \
>  %{save-temps: } \
> -%(subtarget_cc1_spec)"
> +%(subtarget_cc1_spec) %{profile:-p}"
> -#endif
> 
> Other architecture seems to set %{profile:-p} to CC1_SPEC.

Problem is that mips-irix does not want the profile as far as I can tell
which is why the SUBTARGET_CC1_SPEC is a good second idea of where it
should be defined.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] -EB / -EL don't properly affect gcc predefined symbols
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] -EB / -EL don't properly affect gcc predefined symbols
  - From: Hiroki Kaminaga
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] -EB / -EL don't properly affect gcc predefined symbols
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH][RFC] -EB / -EL don't properly affect gcc predefined symbols
  - From: Hiroki Kaminaga

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]