This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Darwin as primary platform

From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 03 Oct 2006 13:36:54 -0700
Subject: Re: Darwin as primary platform
References: <0EEB11C5-FECF-4A02-9CDD-9C13C528DD27@math.purdue.edu> <45148BF7.2040505@apple.com> <4aca3dc20609301525u51de9fbdmedda08a33995bcf2@mail.gmail.com> <m2odsxexm2.fsf@greed.local> <200610010109.k9119UV18722@makai.watson.ibm.com> <B63645A3-084A-41B4-BC40-7ED9E27BA0C9@apple.com> <200610030159.k931xrV34706@makai.watson.ibm.com>

David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> writes:

> 	Bugzilla currently shows 64 open bugs with a darwin listed as the
> target; another 5 Altivec bugs.  I am concerned about the effect on
> releases from increasing the priority of many of those bugs to P1 if
> Darwin is a primary platform.

Which of these bugs do you think would be P1s?

>  Also, there also are a few Bugzilla bugs assigned to Apple
> developers that have not seen any progress and some features
> contributed by Apple don't appear to receive a lot of support.

Could you be more specific?  I am not aware of any problems.  Possibly
these bugzilla bugs should be unassigned.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Darwin as primary platform
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- Re: Darwin as primary platform
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: Darwin as primary platform
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Darwin as primary platform
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]