This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: complex arithmetic in gcc (and various standards)


Hi Gaby

| > My question was a slightly different one. To me it is not clear whether the | > standard allows the treatment of (r,0) as r in complex operations. For | > example: is it allowed to handle (r,0)*(x,y) as r*(x,y)?
| | I don't think so; at least, it might affect negative 0.


Hmm, how?

I'm not sure if the following is exactly Joseph' point, but I'd like to know your opinion about it anyway: if you look to Comment #19 in the audit trail of PR 28408, I noticed that, due to the rule about signed zero (with default rounding):
(+0) + (-0) = +0


the result of the "same" multiplication considered as complex * complex (vs complex * real) has a different sign for the zero imaginary component.

Paolo.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]