Re: Making your branches smaller for easier merges

["Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez" <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>]

On 27/09/06, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:
> Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez wrote on 09/27/06 18:25:
> > On 27/09/06, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> If a pristine directory needs changes from the directory I branched, I'm
> >> in trouble.
> >>
> >
> > Why? Sorry, I think I don't understand what you mean.
> >
> Say I branch gcc/gcc and keep all the runtime libraries pristine.  Now
> suppose that a new change in mainline introduces changes in gcc/libgomp
> which require a new compiler option.
>
> Since I branched gcc/gcc I'm out of sync with mainline and now libgomp
> doesn't build, forcing me to merge my branched directory.

Hum, no? You can either don't update libgomp (or update back to a
previous revision).

Anyway, feel free to end this conversation as soon as you wish since
Paul Brook is right: given fast internet and plenty harddrive, all
this is pointless.

But if you wish to continue, please be my guest :-)

Manuel.