This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Making your branches smaller for easier merges

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:02:07 -0400
Subject: Re: Making your branches smaller for easier merges
References: <4aca3dc20609271337o77f07fdalf85679754e7a80d1@mail.gmail.com> <451AE2CF.9020504@redhat.com> <4aca3dc20609271354y31343217t80ceeebbfac1c989@mail.gmail.com> <6c33472e0609271438o2827b48fm8fdc5e447dcbe470@mail.gmail.com>

Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote on 09/27/06 17:38:

> Why? Perhaps I am entirely wrong but can't you just don't update (svn
> up) those directories that are switched until mainline is in an usable
> state?
> 
If a pristine directory needs changes from the directory I branched, I'm
in trouble.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Making your branches smaller for easier merges
  - From: Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez

References:
- Making your branches smaller for easier merges
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Making your branches smaller for easier merges
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Making your branches smaller for easier merges
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Making your branches smaller for easier merges
  - From: Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]