This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Removing the use of CONSTRUCTOR for Vectors

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Chris Lattner <clattner at apple dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:56:16 -0700
Subject: Re: Removing the use of CONSTRUCTOR for Vectors
References: <1158470634.2407.27.camel@celery.andrew.com> <D68D930F-3C9F-4A13-A317-DA04FBDA86F6@apple.com>

On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 10:33 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2006, at 10:23 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> 
> > I just got crazy idea, since we really don't like CONSTRUCTOR that  
> > much
> > and we already know the lengths of Vectors, we can have a VECTOR_EXPR
> > which we could then use instead of CONSTRUCTORs.
> 
> What don't you like about CONSTRUCTOR's?

For memory usage for vector type, they are use too much memory, more
than twice than what is needed for a vector.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Removing the use of CONSTRUCTOR for Vectors
  - From: Chris Lattner

References:
- Removing the use of CONSTRUCTOR for Vectors
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Removing the use of CONSTRUCTOR for Vectors
  - From: Chris Lattner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]