This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Is PR21674 really fixed for gcc 4.2?
- From: howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu (Jack Howarth)
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: bkoz at redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:07:18 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Is PR21674 really fixed for gcc 4.2?
I noticed that at least on Darwin PPC -m32 and -m64
we have been passing the test cases...
XPASS: 21_strings/basic_string/element_access/char/21674.cc execution test
XPASS: 21_strings/basic_string/element_access/wchar_t/21674.cc execution test
in the libstdc++ testsuite. From what I see in bugzilla for PR21674, it
seems that it should be fixed on gcc trunk, right? Shouldn't the xfail
line be dropped now from those two test cases for the gcc 4.2 release?
Jack