This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both x86_64-darwin and x86_64-linux since they fail to produce a working executable and then xfail. Should we move them to skip or link only and xfail them. With link only they do manage to be quiet in the logs and we'll still notice if they start linking correctly and can move them to run then.
thoughts? pre-approved? :)
Add a means to XFAIL the link of an execute test, if such a means doesn't already exist in the testsuite infrastructure.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |