This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: question about -print-search-dirs

From: "Kate Minola" <kate01123 at gmail dot com>
To: "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:08:11 -0400
Subject: Re: question about -print-search-dirs
References: <9c27041b0609111136i6de26673u39425ff81728c066@mail.gmail.com> <m3lkoq2lzb.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

Ian,

For both lists of libraries, the directories exist.  So I don't understand
your answer.

Kate Minola
University of Maryland, College Park

On 11 Sep 2006 13:21:12 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:

"Kate Minola" <kate01123@gmail.com> writes:

> I guess I would have expected that the two lists of libraries would be the
same,
> or perhaps that the second list would be contained in the first.  But
> this does not
> seem to be the case.
>
> What am I missing?

gcc only generates a -L option for directories which actually exist,
and which actually are directories.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: question about -print-search-dirs
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- question about -print-search-dirs
  - From: Kate Minola
- Re: question about -print-search-dirs
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]