This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: question about -print-search-dirs

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: "Kate Minola" <kate01123 at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 11 Sep 2006 13:21:12 -0700
Subject: Re: question about -print-search-dirs
References: <9c27041b0609111136i6de26673u39425ff81728c066@mail.gmail.com>

"Kate Minola" <kate01123@gmail.com> writes:

> I guess I would have expected that the two lists of libraries would be the same,
> or perhaps that the second list would be contained in the first.  But
> this does not
> seem to be the case.
> 
> What am I missing?

gcc only generates a -L option for directories which actually exist,
and which actually are directories.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: question about -print-search-dirs
  - From: Kate Minola

References:
- question about -print-search-dirs
  - From: Kate Minola

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]