This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: MyGCC and whole program static analysis
- From: Nic Volanschi <nic dot volanschi at free dot fr>
- To: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile at starynkevitch dot net>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, mygcc at free dot fr
- Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 23:19:25 +0200
- Subject: Re: MyGCC and whole program static analysis
- References: <20060830163619.GA3616@ours.starynkevitch.net> <20060830165259.GA4272@ours.starynkevitch.net>
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 18:52, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> Le Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 06:36:19PM +0200, basile écrivait/wrote:
> > Maybe some of your are aware of MyGCC http://mygcc.free.fr/ which
> > seems to be an extended GCC to add some kind of static analysis.
> >
> > I'm quite surprised that the mygcc page gives x86/linux binaries, but
> > no source tarball of their compiler (this seems to me against the
> > spirit of the GPL licence, but I am not a lawyer).
>
> My public apologies to MyGCC. There is a patch on
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg01437.html but sadly the
> http://mygcc.free.fr does not provide any link to it.
>
> It is sad to have to google to find their patch, it would be simpler
> if they linked it (or even gave full source tarball).
Basile,
I apologize for the inconvenience, I agree with everybody that mygcc sources,
although publicly available, were not as easy to get as they had to. It's just
that in my view, the site was only distributing a pre-compiled snapshot of
something going on in a (public) gcc development branch.
So, I fixed all that today:
- there is a link on the site to the proposed gcc patch
- the full source archive is also available in the download page.
Thank you for your interest, and for your announce about the very
exciting starting GGCC project.
Nic.