This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Inserting function calls

From: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: "jean-christophe dot beyler at ulp dot u-strasbg dot fr" <jean-christophe dot beyler at ulp dot u-strasbg dot fr>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:16:05 -0400
Subject: Re: Inserting function calls
References: <20060830204453.w12lyvok0844c8gs@webmail.u-strasbg.fr> <20060830221636.GA6936@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20060831100629.k2u09hfug0kw0cks@webmail.u-strasbg.fr>

Any idea why ? I've looked around in the code to see how they parse
the data dependance tree but I don't see a difference.


Interesting.
So what statements *are* in the list of data dependences if not these.

References:
- Inserting function calls
  - From: jean-christophe . beyler
- Re: Inserting function calls
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: Inserting function calls
  - From: jean-christophe . beyler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]